|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instrument has been determined to follow the affirmative procedure |
|
|
Instrument has been determined to follow the affirmative procedure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instrument has been determined to follow the affirmative procedure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A legislative reform order has been determined to follow the affirmative procedure if the minister has recommended such a procedure and a neither House has agreed to upgrade the order to follow the super-affirmative procedure. Or the minister has recommended the negative procedure and a committee of either House has agreed to upgrade the order to follow the affirmative procedure. |
|
|
Once one House agrees to the affirmative procedure and the other does not upgrade to the super-affirmative procedure we can actualise the final decision to make it clear which procedure the LRO will proceed with. |
|
|
No link |
|
|
Date the second House makes a decision on the procedure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|