Subject Predicate Object
dbrJrhJB
a
Resource
Answer
Written answer
answer has question
Lyh68FMD
answer has answering person
Nicholas Richard Hurd
answer text
<p>The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.</p><p>Letter from Glen Watson, dated February 2013:</p><p>As Director General for the Office for National Statistics (ONS), I have been asked to reply to your Parliamentary Question asking what estimate he has made of the number of women in employment in an (a) part-time and (b) full-time capacity in (i) Glasgow North West constituency, (ii) Glasgow, (iii) Scotland and (iv) the UK in each of the last five years. (144215)</p><p>The ONS compiles Labour Market Statistics for areas below the UK following International Labour Organisation (ILO) definitions using the Annual Population Survey (APS).</p><p>The table shows the number of women who were in full-time or part-time employment in the week prior to interview during the relevant reference periods. Estimates have been provided for the 12 month period ending September 2012, the latest available period, and the 12 month periods ending in December from 2008 to 2011.</p><p>As with any sample survey, estimates from the APS are subject to a margin of uncertainty. A guide to the quality of the estimates is given in the table.</p><p>National and local area estimates for many labour market statistics, including employment, unemployment and claimant count are available on the NOMIS website at:</p><p>http://www.nomisweb.co.uk</p><p><table><thead><tr><td valign="top">Numberof women employed full-time or parttime<br /></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" /><td valign="top">GlasgowNorthWest<br /></td><td valign="top">Glasgow<br /></td><td valign="top">Scotland<br /></td><td valign="top">UnitedKingdom<br /></td></tr><tr><td valign="top">12monthsending:<br /></td><td valign="top">Full-time<br /></td><td valign="top">Part-time<br /></td><td valign="top">Full-time<br /></td><td valign="top">Part-time<br /></td><td valign="top">Full-time<br /></td><td valign="top">Part-time<br /></td><td valign="top">Full-time<br /></td><td valign="top">Part-time<br /></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top">December2008<br /></td><td valign="top">—<br /></td><td valign="top">—<br /></td><td valign="top">85<br /></td><td valign="top">41<br /></td><td valign="top">704<br /></td><td valign="top">490<br /></td><td valign="top">7,739<br /></td><td valign="top">5,702<br /></td></tr><tr><td valign="top">December2009<br /></td><td valign="top">—<br /></td><td valign="top">—<br /></td><td valign="top">81<br /></td><td valign="top">48<br /></td><td valign="top">694<br /></td><td valign="top">502<br /></td><td valign="top">7,600<br /></td><td valign="top">5,755<br /></td></tr><tr><td valign="top">December2010<br /></td><td valign="top">—<br /></td><td valign="top">—<br /></td><td valign="top">80<br /></td><td valign="top">45<br /></td><td valign="top">675<br /></td><td valign="top">515<br /></td><td valign="top">7,589<br /></td><td valign="top">5,762<br /></td></tr><tr><td valign="top">December2011<br /></td><td valign="top">—<br /></td><td valign="top">—<br /></td><td valign="top">73<br /></td><td valign="top">49<br /></td><td valign="top">669<br /></td><td valign="top">507<br /></td><td valign="top">7,591<br /></td><td valign="top">5,801<br /></td></tr><tr><td valign="top">September20121<br /></td><td valign="top">****—<br /></td><td valign="top">****—<br /></td><td valign="top">**72<br /></td><td valign="top">***51<br /></td><td valign="top">*665<br /></td><td valign="top">*512<br /></td><td valign="top">*7,593<br /></td><td valign="top">*5,861<br /></td></tr></tbody><tfoot><tr><td valign="top">—Estimates are considered too unreliable for practicalpurposes<br />1 Coefficients ofVariation have been calculated for the latest period as an indicationof the quality of the estimates. See Guide toQuality.<br />Guide toQuality:<br />The Coefficient ofVariation (CV) indicates the quality of an estimate, the smaller the CVvalue the higher the quality. The true value is likely to lie within+/- twice the CV – for example, for an estimate of 200 with a CVof 5% we would expect the population total to be within the range180-220.#<br />Key<br />*0 = CV &lt;5%—Statistical Robustness: Estimates are consideredprecise<br />** 5 = CV&lt;10%—Statistical Robustness: Estimates are consideredreasonably precise<br />*** 10 = CV&lt;20%—Statistical Robustness: Estimates are consideredacceptable<br />**** CV ?20%—Statistical Robustness: Estimates are considered toounreliable for practicalpurposes<br /></td></tr></tfoot></table></p>
answer given date
answer has answering body
Cabinet Office
written answer has answering body
Cabinet Office
Cabinet Office
answering body has written answer
dbrJrhJB
answering body has answer
dbrJrhJB
Lyh68FMD
question has answer
dbrJrhJB
Nicholas Richard Hurd
answering person has answer
dbrJrhJB