Subject Predicate Object
cs6Wz2C4
a
Resource
External thing
UK Government and Parliament thing
E-petition
Rejected e-petition
UK Government and Parliament e-petition
e-petition has threshold attainment
93BZRGpO
e-petition has moderation
MdNfPveO
lFxACzH5
rejected e-petition has rejection
MdNfPveO
lFxACzH5
external identifier
231297
UK Government and Parliament Id
231297
e-petition UK Government and Parliament Id
231297
action
Condemn the blatant disregard for the rule of law by a Lord Hain.
background
Lord Hain blatantly disregarded a ruling of the Court of Appeal in naming the appellant in the case. He could, if he thought it proper, cause a change in the law. Ignoring a ruling of the court is a dangerous precedent in a democracy and a threat to the separation of power.
additional details
We, the public, do not know if the appellant committed any wrongs. Liability (or guilt) must be decided by the courts, not by parliament. The Telegraph behaved properly in attempting to uncover and report the matter. It also behaved properly in abiding by the ruling of the court. If it appeal to the Supreme Court, it will again be behaving properly and carrying out its role in publicizing legitimate public interest stories.
created at
2018-10-27T08:15:11.025000+00:00
updated at
2018-11-26T17:48:37.761000+00:00
MdNfPveO
rejection has rejected e-petition
cs6Wz2C4
moderation has e-petition
cs6Wz2C4
lFxACzH5
rejection has rejected e-petition
cs6Wz2C4
moderation has e-petition
cs6Wz2C4
93BZRGpO
threshold attainment has e-petition
cs6Wz2C4