Subject Predicate Object
FPD8vV36
a
Resource
Answer
Written answer
answer has question
lLTfuNw5
answer has answering person
Michael Penning
answer text
<p>In May 2013 the Upper Tribunal handed down an interim judgment in a judicial review which challenged the process of when and whether the Department obtains further medical evidence for ESA claimants with a mental health condition going through the WCA process. The Upper Tribunal clarified that the Department has not been found to be in breach of its duty to make reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act 2010, but directed the further steps that should be taken in the proceedings in order to decide the question of whether there are reasonable steps that could be taken in order to avoid the disadvantage it had found to exist.</p><p>The Department does not agree with the judgment and the Court of Appeal have granted permission to appeal it. We welcome this as we believe we have made—and continue to make—significant improvements to the WCA process for people with mental health conditions.</p><p>This appeal will be heard on 21 and 22 October 2013. All proceedings in the Upper Tribunal have been suspended until the appeal has been decided.</p>
answer given date
answer has answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
written answer has answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Department for Work and Pensions
answering body has written answer
FPD8vV36
answering body has answer
FPD8vV36
lLTfuNw5
question has answer
FPD8vV36
Michael Penning
answering person has answer
FPD8vV36