HC Deb 24 June 2004 vol 422 cc88-9WS
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health (Dr. Stephen Ladyman)

I regret that the information I provided in my written statement of 22 June contained an error in line 23 of the table, the entry for the South Yorkshire Strategic Health Authority. Where it read 138 cases eligible for recompense, it should have said 69; and where it read 232 investigations completed, it should have said 163. The correct data is in the table.

SHA Name No. of cases eligible for recompense Investigations completed Investigations underway
Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire SHA 0 281 370
Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire SHA 34 102 110
Essex SHA 10 146 26
North West London SHA 10 181 191
North Central London SHA 8 64 61
North East London SHA 0 169 11
South East London SHA 60 183 90
South West London SHA 62 194 21
Northumberland, Tyne and Wear SHA 27 126 172
County Durham and Tees Valley SHA 10 48 178
North and East Yorkshire and North Lines SHA 29 266 93
West Yorkshire SHA 25 130 219
Cumbria and Lancashire SHA 15 154 186
Greater Manchester SHA 5 102 240
Cheshire and Merseyside SHA 107 774 422
Thames Valley SHA 4 181 202

SHA Name No. of cases eligible for recompense Investigations completed Investigations underway
Hampshire and Isle of Wight SHA 30 386 121
Kent and Medway SHA 24 186 44
Surrey and Sussex SHA 5 15 860
Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire SHA 43 612 349
South West Peninsula SHA 25 433 120
Dorset and Somerset SHA 14 448 467
South Yorkshire SHA 69 163 78
Trent SHA 0 236 79
Leicester, Northants and Rutland SHA 29 202 22
Shropshire and Staffordshire SHA 38 412 19
Birmingham and The Black Country SHA 10 213 73
West Midlands South SHA 8 237 187
Total—England 770 6,713 5,011