Written Statement of 8 April 2003

TRANSPORT

  Airports (Night Noise Restrictions)
  The Minister of State, Department of Transport (Mr. John Spellar)
  On 27 February I announced (Official Report, 26WS) that we had been considering the timetable for the forthcoming consultation about night restrictions at Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted Airports and that we had decided to consult shortly on an interim proposal to extend the present night restrictions regime at those airports for a further year, to October 2005. This consultation paper is published today.

  The policy background to the night flying restrictions at Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted is changing. New European Community legislation is coming into effect; the Government is awaiting the outcome of a long running European Court of Human Rights case about an earlier night restrictions regime at Heathrow Airport; and we are continuing with our major consultation "The Future Development of Air Transport in the United Kingdom: South East" which refers to aspects of night noise policy.

  In view of these developments, as the consultation paper explains, we propose to continue the current night restrictions regime at Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted for a further year, until 30 October 2005. We propose that the movements limits and noise quota for both the winter and summer seasons remain the same as for the respective seasons for each airport in the year from 26 October 2003 to 31 October 2004.

  The consultation paper also commences consideration of some of the general principles and policies underlying the night restrictions; in particular, the present policy of having common arrangements at all three airports and the broad issues relating to the possible extension of the night quota period (currently 2330–0600).

  It also explains how we intend to take forward the results of two reviews relating to the classification of aircraft for night restrictions purposes and how we intend to take forward the results of a separate review of the departure noise limits and the related noise monitoring arrangements.

  The consultation will close on 11 July. Copies of the consultation paper are available in the House Library. All responses will be taken into account. Subject to those responses, we aim to announce our decision on the proposals for 2004–05, by 31 October 2003. Responses on other matters covered in this consultation paper will
  10WS
  be taken into account in developing proposals for the next night restrictions regime for consultation, in due course. They will also be taken into account as appropriate in the forthcoming Air Transport White Paper.

PRIME MINISTER

  Committee on Standards in Public Life
  The Prime Minister (Mr. Tony Blair)
  I am pleased to announce that the ninth Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, entitled "Defining the Boundaries within the Executive: Ministers, Special Advisers and the permanent Civil Service", has been published today by the Committee.

  Copies are available in the Vote Office and the Libraries.

TRADE AND INDUSTRY

  Regional Development Agencies
  The Minister for Employment Relations, Industry and the Regions (Alan Johnson)
  I would like to inform members of the House how the Department will report on the performance of the Regional Development Agencies, including the London Development Agency which reports to the Mayor of London.

  RDAs are funded through the cross departmental Single Programme funding mechanism known as the Single Pot. Attached to the Single Pot is a set of challenging targets which were agreed with the RDAs, and in the case of London, with the Mayor.

  RDAs' achievement against their Tier 3 milestone (output) targets will be reported to the House twice yearly. This will be shortly after the RDAs have submitted their reported achievements against the output targets for the first six months of the financial year and again at the end of the year.

  More information about the performance monitoring framework for the RDAs is available on the DTI website at http://www.dti.gov.uk/rda/info/index.htm.

DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER

  Resource Distribution
  The Minister for Social Exclusion and Deputy Minister for Women (Mrs. Barbara Roche)
  In my written Statement on Friday 4 April, I announced that we would be making available £800 million to local authorities from the Neighbourhood Renewal Fund (NRF) in 2004–05 and 2005–06 as part of our strategy to revitalise England's poorest neighbourhoods and create places where people want to live, not leave.
  11WS
  I am today announcing the details of individual allocations for each of the 88 local authorities that are eligible for NRF. These are set out in the table below.

  Neighbourhood Renewal Fund Allocations 2003–04, 2004–05 and 2005–06

  Local Authority Names

  NRF Allocation 2003–04 (£m)

  NRF Allocation 2004–05 (£m)

  NRF Allocation 2005–06 (£m)

  Allerdale

  0.855494

  0.855494

  0.855494

  Ashfield

  0.963610

  0.963610

  0.963610

  Barking and Dagenham

  1.632728

  1.632728

  1.632728

  Barnsley

  5.444138

  5.444138

  5.444138

  Barrow-in-Furness

  1.838382

  1.838382

  1.838382

  Birmingham

  22.043488

  22.043488

  22.043488

  Blackburn with Darwen

  4.334824

  4.334824

  4.334824

  Blackpool

  3.007888

  3.007888

  3.007888

  Bolsover

  1.468832

  1.468832

  1.468832

  Bolton

  5.425706

  5.425706

  5.425706

  Bradford

  9.811898

  9.811898

  9.811898

  Brent

  2.279124

  2.279124

  2.279124

  Brighton & Hove

  1.368876

  1.368876

  1.368876

  Bristol

  3.565266

  3.565266

  3.565266

  Burnley

  1.273270

  1.273270

  1.273270

  Camden

  4.218670

  4.218670

  4.218670

  Coventry

  5.289550

  5.289550

  5.289550

  Croydon

  0.581248

  0.581248

  0.581248

  Derby

  3.250468

  3.250468

  3.250468

  Derwentside

  1.482310

  1.482310

  1.482310

  Doncaster

  8.789850

  8.789850

  8.789850

  Dudley

  1.520564

  1.520564

  1.520564

  Ealing

  0.917076

  0.917076

  0.917076

  Easington

  4.433270

  4.433270

  4.433270

  Enfield

  1.859594

  1.859594

  1.859594

  Gateshead

  4.642852

  4.642852

  4.642852

  Great Yarmouth

  1.987230

  1.987230

  1.987230

  Greenwich

  3.881452

  3.881452

  3.881452

  Hackney

  11.765406

  11.765406

  11.765406

  Halton

  3.928410

  3.928410

  3.928410

  Hammersmith and Fulharn

  1.033290

  1.033290

  1.033290

  Haringey

  5.334814

  5.334814

  5.334814

  Hartlepool

  3.137518

  3.137518

  3.137518

  Hastings

  1.375160

  1.375160

  1.375160

  Hyndburn

  1.293636

  1.293636

  1.293636

  Islington

  6.270020

  6.270020

  6.270020

  Kensington and Chelsea

  1.080670

  1.080670

  1.080670

  Kerrier

  1.610488

  1.610488

  1.610488

  Kingston upon Hull

  7.507272

  7.507272

  7.507272

  Kirklees

  2.992056

  2.992056

  2.992056

  Knowsley

  7.390938

  7.390938

  7.390938

  Lambeth

  2.421686

  2.421686

  2.421686

  Leeds

  8.395582

  8.395582

  8.395582

  Leicester

  8.376970

  8.376970

  8.376970

  Lewisham

  2.452506

  2.452506

  2.452506

  Lincoln

  0.400000

  0.400000

  0.400000

  Liverpool

  20.132706

  20.132706

  20.132706

  Luton

  1.509866

  1.509866

  1.509866

  Manchester

  20.595082

  20.595082

  20.595082

  Mansfield

  2.298642

  2.298642

  2.298642

  Middlesbrough

  5.249302

  5.249302

  5.249302

  Newcastle upon Tyne

  6.843050

  6.843050

  6.843050

  Newham

  13.331960

  13.331960

  13.331960

  North Tyneside

  3.073580

  3.073580

  3.073580

  Nottingham

  9.245880

  9.245880

  9.245880

  Oldham

  4.673976

  4.673976

  4.673976

  Pendle

  1.960942

  1.960942

  1.960942

  Pen with

  0.829146

  0.829146

  0.829146

  Plymouth

  2.114140

  2.114140

  2.114140

  Portsmouth

  0.956660

  0.956660

  0.956660

  Preston

  2.520434

  2.520434

  2.520434

  Redcar and Cleveland

  3.472138

  3.472138

  3.472138

  Rochdale

  4.877998

  4.877998

  4.877998

  Rotherham

  3.668606

  3.668606

  3.668606

  12WS

  Neighbourhood Renewal Fund Allocations 2003–04, 2004–05 and 2005–06

  Local Authority Names

  NRF Allocation 2003–04 (£m)

  NRF Allocation 2004–05 (£m)

  NRF Allocation 2005–06 (£m)

  Salford

  5.440814

  5.440814

  5.440814

  Sandwell

  8.050568

  8.050568

  8.050568

  Sedgefield

  1.138926

  1.138926

  1.138926

  Sefton

  5.631300

  5.631300

  5.631300

  Sheffield

  9.580862

  9.580862

  9.580862

  South Tyneside

  5.382194

  5.382194

  5.382194

  Southampton

  0.861780

  0.861780

  0.861780

  Southwark

  7.912358

  7.912358

  7.912358

  St Helens

  3.873114

  3.873114

  3.873114

  Stockton-on-Tees

  3.852204

  3.852204

  3.852204

  Stoke-on-Trent

  4.033744

  4.033744

  4.033744

  Sunderland

  7.163770

  7.163770

  7.163770

  Tameside

  1.340230

  1.340230

  1.340230

  Tower Hamlets

  10.623640

  10.623640

  10.623640

  Wakefield

  4.439314

  4.439314

  4.439314

  Walsall

  7.121950

  7.121950

  7.121950

  Waltham Forest

  2.553490

  2.553490

  2.553490

  Wandsworth

  0.400000

  0.400000

  0.400000

  Wansbeck

  1.379330

  1.379330

  1.379330

  Wear Valley

  1.706214

  1.706214

  1.706214

  Westminster

  1.497296

  1.497296

  1.497296

  Wigan

  2.725242

  2.725242

  2.725242

  Wirral

  5.075192

  5.075192

  5.075192

  Wolverhampton

  5.928270

  5.928270

  5.928270

  Totals

  400.000

  400.000

  400.000

  Regional Government
  The Minister for Local Government and the Regions (Mr. Nick Raynsford)
  Following changes made to the Regional Assemblies (Preparations) Bill, I am writing today to all Members in the English regions outside London to follow up my earlier letter about the soundings exercise on the level of interest in holding a referendum about establishing an elected regional assembly. Voters in two-tier local authority areas will now have a say about the form of unitary local government relating to their area that would be introduced if an elected assembly is established.

  Those who have already responded to this exercise are also being contacted again. In both cases, we are making it clear that we will consider further evidence or comments if people's views have changed in light of the amendments. We do not expect this to cause many people to change their minds about their response to the soundings exercise, but if people have changed their minds we would be happy to receive further views, information and evidence on this matter. If their response remains the same, they do not need to take any action-their original response will be considered as before. Additionally, any individual or organisation who did not previously submit comments, but now wishes to put forward views, information or evidence on the level of interest in a referendum can do so.

  Copies of the revised pro-forma have been deposited in the Libraries of both Houses. They are also available from the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's website via http://www.odpm.gov.uk. Responses to this additional phase of the soundings exercise are requested by 16 May, since the Secretary of State is likely to take his decision shortly after that.

ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS

  Energy Efficiency Targets
  The Minister for the Environment (Mr. Michaell Meacher)
  Following announcement of the Climate Change Levy, an energy tax that came into force on 1 April 2001, the Government agreed that companies in energy intensive industries could enter into 10-year energy efficiency agreements in return for an 80 per cent reduction in the levy rate. Forty-four sector associations signed agreements, representing over 5,000 companies, who operate over 12,000 individual facilities.

  The first target period ended on 31 December 2002 and companies that met the terms of their agreements were re-certified on 1 April 2003 for the reduced rate of Levy payments for the two forthcoming financial years.

  There were a total of 5,742 "target units" in the Agreements when the results were submitted by sector associations in February 2003. (A target unit is one or more facilities that share a single target) Overall, 5,042 target units were re-certified, or 88 per cent. of the total. This represents a total of 10,500 facilities. Of the 700 target units that were not re-certified, 581 dropped out of their agreement or did not return information to their sector association and 219 failed to meet their targets.

  The CCAs as a whole saved 13.5 million tonnes of CO2 (3.7 mt Cartoon1) against an estimated 2000 baseline, or 15.8 million tonnes of CO2 (4.3mt C) against pre-CCL baselines. This is 10m tonnes more than projected. However, a large majority of this reduction came from the steel sector. Even without this contribution the other sectors have exceeded their targets by almost 1 million tonnes of CO2.

  If the sectors with energy efficiency targets had produced their 2002 output at their efficiency in their baseline year they would have emitted an extra 5.2 million tonnes of CO2. This demonstrates real gains in energy efficiency.

  Companies were able to purchase allowances in the UK emissions trading scheme in order to help meet their target, and 600,000 allowances were bought and retired this purpose. Companies were also able to convert any over-achievement into allowances that can be sold or used against future targets. A total of 4.0 million tonnes of CO2 has either been sold or retained for future use, subject to independent verification.

  A summary of the performance of the sectors is attached. A full analysis is available in the document Climate Change Agreements—Results of the First Target Period Assessment and at http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/ccl/results.htm. Please note that this is a preliminary analysis at this stage. Defra will continue to update this document when more complete analyses have been completed.
  1The UK Climate Change Programme uses units of carbon rather than CO2 to measure greenhouse gas emissions, so both units are presented here.
  14WS
  The performance by sector is given in the following table.

  Sector

  Number of Facilities Re-certified

  ‥ of target units re-certified

  Absolute Saving kt(CO2) (a)

  Aerospace

  21

  100%

  15

  Aluminium

  57

  100%

  2000

  Craft Baking

  2967

  100%

  -9

  Brewing

  62

  100%

  29

  Cement

  17

  100%

  1600

  Ceramics

  223

  97%

  188

  Chemicals

  285

  100%

  2000

  Cathode Ray Tubes

  3

  100%

  21

  Dairy Industry

  133

  99%

  35

  Egg Processing

  9

  100%

  1.9

  NFU—Eggs

  277

  68%

  53

  Eurisol (Mineral Wool)

  6

  100%

  8.9

  Food & Drink

  1081

  100%

  160

  Foundries

  217

  95%

  139

  Glass

  45

  100%

  39

  Gypsum Products

  6

  100%

  -21

  Leather

  11

  100%

  6

  Lime

  8

  100%

  170

  Malting

  33

  100%

  4.2

  Poultry Meat Processing/Feed

  81

  98%

  -30

  British Meat Fedtn

  185

  97%

  27

  Metal Forming

  107

  100%

  23

  Metal Packaging

  23

  95%

  18

  Motor Manufacturers

  19

  100%

  36

  NFU—Pigs

  608

  100%

  64

  Non-Ferrous

  111

  100%

  130

  Paper

  84

  100%

  -930

  NFU—Poultry Meat

  520

  83%

  53

  Poultry Meat Rearing

  1050

  99%

  72

  Printing

  105

  96°A

  -22

  Rendering

  20

  100%

  14

  Reprotech

  1

  100%

  Rubber

  8

  100%

  171

  Semiconductors

  18

  100%

  60

  Slag Grinders

  6

  100%

  3.5

  Spirits

  68

  100%

  42

  Steel

  60

  100%

  9400

  Supermarkets

  1342

  100%

  5.7

  Surface Engineering

  187

  100%

  29

  Textiles

  153

  100%

  114

  Agricultural Supply

  178

  100%

  23

  Vehicle Builders And Repairers

  60

  100%

  0

  Wallcoverings

  15

  100%

  28

  Wood Panel

  9

  100%

  -22

  Total

  10,479

  15,749

DEFENCE

  Clyde Naval Base
  The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Defence (Dr. Lewis Moonie)
  The Ministry of Defence's Contract for the provision of new jetties in support of the Royal Navy's nuclear submarine fleet at HM Naval Base Clyde was awarded on 31 March 2003 to AMEC plc.
  15WS
  AMEC have been awarded the design, construction and commissioning contract worth approximately £100 million as part of its existing Prime Contract.

  The contract will provide a floating jetty facility that provides four alongside berths, two of which are double berths, thereby giving six fully serviced berthing positions. The construction is due to be completed by 2007.

  Welfare Support (Gulf)
  The Minister of State, Ministry of Defence (Mr. Adam Ingram)
  Further to the announcement made by my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister on 2 April, I can now set out the way in which we intend to implement a service to allow families to send packets free of charge to troops deployed in the Gulf. This service will be limited to letters and packets of up to 2kg in weight and will be implemented when the operational situation allows. The priority at this time must remain the operational requirements of our Service personnel.

  The system will allow families to send addressed letters and packets to individuals serving in the Gulf through Post Office Counters free of charge. The Royal Mail Group will transport these parcels to British Forces Post Office (BFPO) at Mill Hill. BFPO will arrange onward transportation to the Gulf and distribution in theatre. Mechanisms are being put in place to handle the anticipated increase in mail. Further details will be announced nearer the time when we are ready to implement the new procedures.

  For the free service to work for the benefit of all, I would ask families to restrict the number of packets they send in order that the system does not become overwhelmed, thus creating delays in delivery of mail.

  This scheme is aimed only at those closest to the Service personnel who are serving in this operation. We will not be providing a service for packages which do not have a named recipient. This will help to ensure that the new scheme for letters and packets is well targeted without overloading the logistics support network and delaying vital messages and packages from loved ones. For those who might wish to show more general support for our troops I would encourage contributions to the UK Forces Gulf Fund (details available at http://www.ukforcesgulffund.org and 0800 107 0200) which has recently been set up to allow the public to support those injured as a result of their deployment in support of military operations in the Gulf, and the families and dependants of those who have been killed.

TREASURY

  UK and IMF 2002
  The Chancellor of the Exchequer (Mr. Gordon Brown)
  I am today publishing the fourth annual report to Parliament on UK operations at the IMF, "Growth, Stability, Poverty Reduction: the UK and IMF 2002". Copies are available in the Library of the House.

EDUCATION AND SKILLS

  Higher Education
  The Secretary of State for Education and Skills (Mr. Charles Clarke)
  I have today published our document Widening Participation in Higher Education, which sets out our plans to safeguard access and widen participation in Higher Education, giving more help and opportunities to all our people to achieve of their best.

  We face an historic problem in our society: the under-achievement of many people who come from less advantaged backgrounds. In 2000, just 18 per cent. of young people from the lower three socio-economic groups were benefiting from Higher Education, compared with 48 per cent. of young people from the higher three socio-economic groups.

  Education must be a force for opportunity and social justice. Whilst meeting the challenge of expanding Higher Education, we need to ensure fair access and equality of opportunity for all those who have the potential to benefit from it, irrespective of their background, schooling or income. Universities have a crucial role to play in this task. They need to identify, encourage, admit and support to graduation all those who have the potential to succeed.

  The evidence set out in Widening Participation in Higher Education suggests that the principal barriers to access to Higher Education are attainment, aspiration and application.

  We are tackling the attainment gap with a range of initiatives, from the very earliest years onwards, to improve standards and widen opportunities. The Sure Start programme aims to improve the health and well-being of families and children in deprived areas from the very beginning. The National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies have led to significant advances in achievement for all groups at primary school level since 1997 but more so for children from disadvantaged homes. Our planned 14–19 reforms will improve standards and choices, and our Success for All programme is reforming Further Education by raising standards of teaching and learning.

  We are already working to raise aspirations through the successful Aimhigher programme. Many universities are also taking imaginative actions to ensure that more people with real talent apply to university. However, of those students who obtain A level passes corresponding to 30 UCAS points, those from the three higher socio-economic groups are significantly more likely to apply for places at the longest established universities than those from the lower groups. Therefore, universities and colleges could do more to raise aspirations and encourage a broader range of applications.

  Although application rates differ by social class between different types of universities, acceptance rates from those applying are much closer. Admissions to universities are a matter for universities themselves and generally they operate in a way that is fair. Admissions should always be on merit—irrespective of class, background or school attended—based on an applicant's achievements and potential. A-levels are the single most important way for assessing merit but

  17WS
  universities are increasingly using a range of other ways to help them make admissions decisions. The Government has asked Professor Stephen Schwartz, Vice Chancellor of Brunei University to lead a team to identify good practice in admissions. We expect one of the results of this work to be a statement of principles about admissions which we hope all universities will adopt. Universities wanting to charge a higher variable tuition fee will wish to demonstrate to the Office for Fair Access that they subscribe to these principles.

  There are also concerns that the proposed introduction of variable tuition fees poses a risk to widening access. The Government plans to take a range of measures to address this, including the re-introduction of a maintenance grant and abolishing up-front tuition fees. Nevertheless, it is also important that universities which wish to increase their fees play their full part in preserving and widening access.

  For that reason, the Government proposes to legislate when Parliamentary time is available to require institutions wishing to increase their fees in excess of the standard fee (currently £1,100) for any of their courses to draw up an access agreement. Agreements will fall to be approved by a new Office for Fair Access (OFFA), which will be separate from but supported by HEFCE. OFFA will operate within a legal and policy framework established by the Government but will exercise its
  18WS
  independent judgement in applying this framework. I will send the head of OFFA an initial letter, together with revisions from time to time, setting out OFFA's statutory duties and how they are to be met.

  The access agreement will cover a five-year period and will set out the fee levels the institution wishes to levy (up to a maximum of £3,000 from 2006); the bursaries and other financial support available; the outreach work to be undertaken by the institution with schools and colleges to help raise the level of attainment, aspirations and applications; and the institution's own milestones for assessing progress in widening participation. An Individual university's admissions policies and procedures will be outside the remit of the access agreement and OFFA. OFFA will monitor implementation of the access agreements and make an annual report to Parliament.

  There will be no targets or quotas set by the Government. We are working to ensure that everyone who has the ability to participate in Higher Education does so, if we are to expand to meet our future economic needs without sacrificing quality.

  There will be a period for comment until 2 June 2003.

  Copies of the document will be placed in the Library and will be available in the Vote and Printed Papers Office.