§ Mr. MeacherTo ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much public funding was spent per pupil in Oldham West and Royton in each of the last seven years. [170911]
Net current expenditure per pupil Pre-Primary Education Primary Education Pre-primary and Primary Secondary Education Special 1996–97 n/a n/a 1,890 2,510 11,540 1997–98 n/a n/a 1,910 2,530 12,150 1998–99 n/a n/a 2,080 2,730 14,130 1999–2000 0 2,260 2,300 2,820 16,470 2000–01 0 2,400 2,500 3,050 17,630 2001–02 0 2,690 2,840 3,430 19,210 2002–03 — 2,940 — 3,780 — Notes: 1 The financial data are taken from Oldham LEA'S Section 52 Outturn Statement submitted to the DfES from 1999–2000 onwards and the ODPM's RO1 statement previously Expenditure was not distinguished between pre-primary and primary sectors until the inception of the Section 52 outturn statement in 1999–2000. 1999–2000 figures reflect the return of GM schools to local authority maintenance. 2 The outturn 2002–03 tables captured the data in a fundamentally different way to the previous years. Categories were aligned with the Consistent Financial Reporting framework and the spending by LEAs was no longer split by school sector. Consequently the unit costs per pupil in 2002–03 are not strictly comparable with earlier years as they include an apportionment of LEA expenditure based on pupil numbers. 2002–03 data is subject to change by the LEA. Figures are rounded to the nearest £10. 3 Net current expenditure (NCE) includes expenditure within schools and also that incurred centrally by the LEA. 4 The NCE per pupil figures for primary and primary relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in the pre-primary sector and maintained primary schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained nursery and primary schools sector. 5 The NCE per pupil figures for secondary relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in maintained secondary schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained secondary schools sector. 6 The NCE per pupil figures for special schools relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in maintained special schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained special schools sector. 7 Pupil data are drawn from the Annual Schools Census adjusted to be on a financial year basis.
§ Mr. DjanoglyTo ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much public funding was spent, per pupil, in the Huntingdon constituency in each of the last seven years. [170838]
§ Mr. MilibandThe information requested is
1058W
Net current expenditure per pupil Pre-primary education Primary education Pre-primary and primary Secondary education Special 1996–97 n/a n/a 1,940 2,740 14,080 1997–98 n/a n/a 1,910 2,740 15,210 1998–99 n/a. n/a 2,040 2,750 16,680 1999–2000 14,360 2,080 2,160 2,720 17,240 2000–01 20,900 2,290 2,400 2,930 18,850 2001–02 21,020 2,490 2,600 3,150 20,430 2002–03 — 2,850 — 3,500 — Notes: 1. The financial data are taken from Cambridgeshire LEA's Section 52 Outturn Statement submitted to the DIES from 1999–2000 onwards and the ODPM's RO1 statement previously. Figures up to and including 1997–98 are for Cambridgeshire LEA prior to local government reorganization. From 1998– 99 part of Cambridgeshire LEA became Peterborough LEA. Expenditure was not distinguished between pre-primary and primary sectors until the inception of the Section 52 Out turn Statement in 1999–2000. 1999–2000 figures reflect the return of GM schools to local authority maintenance. 2. The outturn 2002–03 tables captured the data in a fundamentally different way to the previous years. Categories were aligned with the Consistent Financial Reporting framework and the spending by LEAs was no longer split by school sector. Consequently the unit costs per pupil in 2002–03 are not strictly comparable with earlier years as they include an apportionment of LEA expenditure based on pupil numbers. 2002–03 data is subject to change by the LEA. Figures are rounded to the nearest £10. 3. Net current expenditure (NCE) includes expenditure within schools and also that incurred centrally by the LEA. 4. The NCE per pupil figures for pre-primary and primary relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in the pre-primary sector and maintained primary schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained nursery and primary schools sector. 5. The NCE per pupil figures for secondary relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in maintained secondary schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained secondary schools sector. 6. The NCE per pupil figures for special schools relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in maintained special schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained special schools sector. 7. Pupil data are drawn from the Annual Schools Census adjusted to be on a financial year basis.
§ Mr. MilibandThe information requested is submitted to the Department according to local education authority areas rather than districts within an area. Oldham West and Royton is a district of Oldham local education authority. The information for Oldham LEA is as follows:
submitted to the Department according to local education authority areas rather than districts within an area. Huntingdon is a district of Cambridgeshire local education authority. The information for Cambridgeshire LEA is as follows:
1059W
§ Mr. PickthallTo ask the Secretary of State for Eduction and Skills how much public money was spent per pupil in West Lancashire in each of the last seven years [171490]
§ Mr. MilibandThe information requested is
Net current expenditure per pupil Pre-primary education Primary education Pre-primary and primary Secondary education Special 1996–97 n/a n/a 1,800 2,590 15,990 1997–98 n/a n/a 1,820 2,630 17,320 1998–99 n/a n/a 2,000 2,700 17,770 1999–2000 7,130 2,110 2,170 2,760 18,490 2000–01 11,030 2,330 2,440 2,910 18,770 2001–02 16,390 2,630 2,800 3,230 20,600 2002–03 — 2,900 — 3,400 — Notes: 1. The financial data are taken from Lancashire LEA's Section 52 Outturn Statement submitted to the DfES from 1999–2000 onwards and the ODPM's RO1 statement previously. Figures up to and including 1997–98 figures are for Lancashire LEA prior to local government reorganisation. From 1998–99 onwards parts of Lancashire LEA became Blackpool and Blackburn LEAs. Expenditure was not distinguished between pre-primary and primary sectors until the inception of the Section 52 Out[...]urn Statement in 1999–2000. 1999–2000 figures reflect the return of GM schools to local authority maintenance. 2. The outturn 2002–03 tables captured the data in a fundamentally different way to the previous years. Categories were aligned with the Consistent Financial Reporting framework and the spending by LEAs was no longer split by school sector. Consequently the unit costs per pupil in 2002–03 are not strictly comparable with earlier years as they include an apportionment of LEA expenditure based on pupil numbers. 2002–03 data is subject to change by the LEA. Figures are rounded to the nearest £10. 3. Net current expenditure (NCE) includes expenditure within schools and also that incurred centrally by the LEA. 4. The NCE per pupil figures for pre-primary and primary relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in the pre-primary sector and maintained primary schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained nursery and primary schools sector. 5. The NCE per pupil figures for secondary relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in maintained secondary schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained secondary schools sector. 6. The NCE per pupil figures for special schools relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in maintained special schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained special schools sector 7. Pupil data are drawn from the Annual Schools Census adjusted to be on a financial year bass.