HC Deb 11 March 2004 vol 418 cc1713-4W
Mr. Jenkin

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister on what basis he decided that the referendums for elected regional assemblies should be conducted by all-postal ballot. [159824]

Phil Hope:

Following a series of pilots in local authority elections and thorough evaluation by the Electoral Commission, it is clear that all-postal ballots can significantly increase the levels of participation in elections. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister considered this evidence carefully, before announcing our intention to hold the referendums by all-postal ballot in response to a question from the hon. Member for South Ribble (Mr. Borrow) on 22 October 2003.

Ann Winterton

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister to whom Government Offices of the Regions would be accountable if regional assemblies are introduced. [160740]

Mr. Raynsford

Government Offices for the Regions will remain as part of central Government and will continue to be responsible to Government Ministers.

Existing RPGs and proposed revisions
Region Draft RPG

published

Existing RPG

Public

examination

into RPG

Issue of final

RPG

Draft RPG/RSS

published

Revision timetable

Public

examination

into RPG/PSS

Target for issue

of final RPG/

RSS

East of England (Formally RPG6 but to

become RPG 14) (Revision will extend

coverage to whole of the East region)

August 1998

(issued for

consultation by GO)

February 1999 November 2000 September 2004 June/July 2005 July 2006
North East (RPGI) December 1999 June/July 2000 November 2002 November 2004 August 2005 June 2006
East Midlands (RPG8) November 1999 July 2000 January 2002 Spring 20031 Autemn 20031 Autumn 20041
South East (RPG9) (Revision will exclude

areas now included in the East and

London)

December 1998 May 1999 March 2001 Summer 2005 Late 2005 Autumn 2006
South East (Waste Review) Early 20041 Autumn 20041 Summer 20051
South West (RPG10) August 1999 March/April 2000 September 2001 Autumn 20041 Early 20061 Early 20071
west Midlands(RPG11) April 1998 November 2001 June 2002 Early 2004
Yorkshire and the Humber (RPG 12) October 1999 June/July 2000 October 2001 End 2004 Autumn 2005 Summer 2006
Yorkshire and the Humber June 20031 February 20041 Late 20041
North West (RPG 13) June/July 2000 February 2001 March 2003 March 20041 November 20041 Late 20051
Milton Keynes and South Midlands Study

(MKSM), will inform RPG for the East of

England, the South East and East

Midlands.

July 2003 March-April 2004 February 2005 1Partial review only

However the Government intend to devolve to elected assemblies some of the functions currently discharged through Government Offices. The assembly would be accountable to its electorate for those devolved functions.

Ann Winterton

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister from which funding source the difference between the 2002–03 Government grant of £780 million for the North West Region, £350 million for the North East Region and £570 million for the Yorkshire and the Humber Region and the EU funding of £254 million for the North West, £88 million for the North East and £185 million for Yorkshire and the Humber was provided. [160742]

Mr. Raynsford

The difference between the 2002–03 likely total budgets for elected regional assemblies and the European programme funding is the block grant which assemblies will receive from central Government. The budgets for which a future elected regional assembly would be responsible (in the form of the block grant) are currently allocated to the Government Offices and non-departmental public bodies from central Government Departments.