HC Deb 23 July 2004 vol 424 cc834-7W
Mr. Rosindell

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many asylum seekers requested entrance to European Union member states in(a) 1997, (b) 1999, (c) 2001, (d) 2003 and (e) 2004. [184262]

Mr. Browne

Information on the number of asylum seekers requesting entrance to European Union member states is not available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. For example for the UK the majority of applications are made in country and it is therefore not possible to identify such cases as asylum seekers prior to entry.

Including dependants, applications for asylum in the UK fell by 41 per cent. in 2003 compared with a fall of 10 per cent. in applications to the rest of the EU (excluding Italy). When the relative size of domestic populations is taken into account, the UK ranks seventh among EU countries (excluding Italy) in terms of asylum seekers per head of population.

Information on the number of asylum seekers applying for asylum in European Union member states is given in the table. (Data for 2004 are not currently available and hence data for the 10 new EU member states are not included.)

Applications1 received for asylum in Europe, including dependants,

by year of application, 1997 to 2003

European

Union

Countries

1997 1998 1999 2000
Austria 6,700 13,800 20,100 18,300
Belgium2 13,300 25,000 40,800 48,700
Denmark 5,100 5,700 6,500 10,100
Finland 1,000 1,300 3,100 3,200
France2 24,200 25,500 35,100 44,200
Germany 104,400 98,600 95,100 78,600
Greece3 4,400 3,000 1,500 3,000
Ireland 3,900 4,600 7,700 10,900
Italy4 1,700 9,500 33,400 18,000
Luxembourg3 400 1,700 2,900 600
Netherlands 34,400 45,200 39,300 43,900
Protugal3 300 400 300 200
Spain 5,000 6,600 8,400 7,200
Sweden 9,600 12,800 11,200 16,300
United Kingdom5 41,500 58,500 91,200 98,900
Total EU 255,800 312,300 396,700 401,900
20016 20026 20037 Asylum

seekers/

1,000 of

population8

Austria 30,100 39,400 32,400 3.9
Belguim3 28,000 21,400 19,300 1.9
Denmark 12,500 5,900 4,600 0.8
Finland 1,700 3,400 3,100 0.6
France3 53,900 58,100 70,700 1.2
Germany 88,300 71,100 50,400 0.6
Greece4 5,500 5,700 8,200 0.7
Ireland 10,300 11,600 7,900 2.0
Italy5 9,600 7,300 n/a n/a
Luxembourg4 700 1,000 1,600 3.1
Netherlands 32,600 18,700 13,400 0.8
20016 20026 20037 Asylum

seekers/

1,000 of

population8

Portugal4 200 200 100 0.0
Spain 9,200 6,200 5,700 0.1
Sweden 23,500 33,000 31,400 3.5
United Kingdom 91,600 103,100 61,100 1.0
Total EU 397,600 386,100 309,700 0.9
1 Figures rounded to the nearest 100.
2 Figures based on IGC data but adjusted to include an estimated number of dependants.
3 Figures based on UNHCR data, including dependants.
4 IGC data for 1997 to 1998. UNHCR data for 1999 to 2002
5 Figures have been adjusted to include an estimated number of dependants between 1997 and 2001, 2002 and 2003 figures based on actual data..
6 Revised figures.
7 Provisional figures.
8 Source: 2003 World Population Data Sheet, Population Reference Bureau website.

Information on asylum applications in EU member states is published in quarterly web pages and in the annual statistical bulletin 'Asylum Statistics United Kingdom'. Asylum Statistics United Kingdom 2003 will be available from the end of August 2004. Copies of these publications and others relating to general immigration to the UK are available from the Library and from the Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate web site at http://www. homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/immigration_1.html.

Mr. Wiggin

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what research his Department has commissioned to establish the number of failed asylum applicants who remain in the United Kingdom illegally; and if he will make a statement. [184025]

Mr. Browne

The Government have commissioned research into the methods used in other countries to estimate the size of their illegal populations in order to define methods appropriate for the UK. The work on this is ongoing.

Mr. Jim Cunningham

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on the current time taken to return failed asylum seekers. [184175]

Mr. Browne

I refer my hon. Friend to a reply given to a similar question posed by Gareth Thomas MP on 12 June 2003.

The Immigration Service (IS) is fully committed to removing failed asylum seekers and others who have no entitlement to be in the United Kingdom.

There are no publishable guidelines or data on how quickly removal should take place. The speed with which a failed asylum seeker is removed very much depends on the individual circumstances of each case, whether there are any barriers to removal (including lack of co-operation by the government of their country of origin) and how quickly these can be overcome.

Tom Brake

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what discussions he has had with the Department for International Development and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office regarding the conditions of failed Somali asylum seekers who have been returned to Somalia. [181483]

Mr. Browne

The Department for International Development (DFID) and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) were informed of our programme of enforced returns to Somalia and we keep in close contact with these Departments at official and ministerial level on the situation in Somalia. The Home Office's Country Information and Policy Unity (CIPU) produce country information materials that are used as the background against which asylum applications are considered. The FCO are consulted about these country information materials, prior to the publication of the documents in order to ensure that this material is accurate and comprehensive.

Caseworkers also have access at all times to senior caseworkers with specific country knowledge, as well as to CIPU which provides up-to-date and specific information on request, drawing on a range of reliable sources, including the FCO, with which CIPU maintains regular contact. If, on the basis of the available information, a Somali asylum applicant is found not to be in need of protection by the Home Office and by the independent Immigration Appellate Authority, then it is considered safe for that person to be returned to Somalia, and they will be considered for removal. We do not routinely monitor the conditions of failed asylum seekers once they have been returned to their country, having been found to have no protection needs.

It is also worth noting that according to the UNHCR's 2003 Global Refugee Report, 9,543 Somali refugees were assisted to return to North West Somalia (Somaliland) from Ethiopia and Djibouti, while 680 returned to North-west Somalia (Puntland) and four to Mogadishu, bringing the total number of assisted Somali returnees to 10,227 last year.

Lynne Jones

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many single additional payments were made to asylum seekers, under Regulation 11 of the Asylum Support Regulations 2000, in each financial year since 2000–01; [176073]

(2) what the estimated cost savings are of the proposed abolition of the –50 single additional payment available to National Asylum Support Service supported asylum seekers. [176074]

Mr. Browne

The estimated number of Single Additional Payments made since 2000–01 is set out in the following table:

Financial Year Number
2000–01 2,000
2001–02 32,000
2002–03 47,000
2003–04 63,000

We estimate that abolition will save the Exchequer approximately £4 million in the next financial year.

Single Additional Payments were introduced when financial assistance was paid by way of vouchers. Now that support is provided entirely in cash, asylum seekers are no longer limited to where they can shop and can get better value for their money. Moreover, as applications are being processed more quickly, with 80 per cent. of initial claims processed within two months, the justification for one-off payments every six months is reduced.

Asylum seekers can still apply for a £300 maternity payment and since March 2003 additional support for pregnant women and children under three has meant that the level of asylum support has increased overall for these more vulnerable groups.

Forward to