§ Ms Oona KingTo ask the Deputy Prime Minister how much social housing grant was spent by(a) the Housing Corporation and (b) local authorities in each region in (i) 2001–02 and (ii) 2002–03. [149404]
§ Keith HillSocial housing grant (SHG) spent through the Housing Corporation's approved development programme (ADP) and local authority social housing grant (LASHG) for each region in 2001–02 and 2002–03 is tabled as follows:
§ Keith HillEstimates of the number of new social housing dwellings provided each year since 1991–2 are tabled as follows:
§ Yvette CooperAll of these tables have already been published on the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's website and they are available in the Library of the House. It is not intended to publish them in a printed report,
§ Ms Oona KingTo ask the Deputy Prime Minister pursuant to his answer to the hon. Member for Tewkesbury of 3 November 2003,Official Report, 1465W column 501W, on the tenancy deposit scheme, what the outcome was of the seminar held in December to discuss the case for linking legislation for compulsory measures to protect tenancy deposits to the Law Commission's findings. [149434]
§ Keith Hill:The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister is pleased to say that the seminar held on 19 December achieved a good attendance from those representing landlords, tenants, local authorities and housing professionals. It appeared to achieve a widespread understanding among those attending of the need to steer a course that considered the scope for linking legislation for compulsory measures to protect tenancy deposits to a need for written agreements for all tenants. A need for all tenants to have written agreements was proposed in the Law Commission's report 'Renting Homes' published in November.
§ Ms Oona King:To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will place in the Library copies of the papers presented at the seminar held in December to discuss the case for linking legislation for compulsory measures to protect tenancy deposits to the Law Commission's findings. [149435]
§ Keith Hill:With the approval of their authors the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister will do so.
§ Ms Oona King:To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will introduce a statutory national tenancy deposit scheme. [149436]
§ Keith Hill:The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister is considering in the light of the seminar of 19 December a full response to our consultation a year ago with the results of our consideration of proposals for future measures to provide for tenancy deposit protection that could encompass a range of approved but mandatory schemes.
§ Ms Oona King:To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what account his Department asked the Law Commission to take of the issue of protecting tenancy deposits as part of its project on tenure reform; and what evidence the Law Commission requested from consultees on this issue. [149437]
§ Keith Hill:The Law Commission consultation paper 162 of May 2002 stated in paragraph 1.85 that:
"The question of whether or not tenancy deposits should be regulated, and if so how—an issue covered in the legislation of many Commonwealth jurisdictions 38—is not considered here. It is currently the subject of pilot projects being run by the Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions."In the Law Commission's interim response to this consultation, their paper 284 of November 2003 stated in paragraph 2.27 that:
1466W"During the period of our consultation, we were aware that schemes relating to tenancy deposits were being tested and evaluated by ODPM. In 2003, the outcome of this evaluation was produced. It has become clear that policy makers see considerable potential for building contractual obligations relating to the taking and repayment of deposits into the scheme we are proposing, even though we did not consider the issue as part of our project.Further on in that report, in a footnote to paragraph 8.14 on key terms it is stated:
"We have considered whether we should recommend that the Secretary of State include in the secondary legislation a default term about whether fixtures and chattels are included in the agreement and whether an inventory must be provided. This issue ties in closely with work ODPM are doing on the regulation of deposits (as disputes are often about the existence or state of items which could have been listed in an inventory to avoid disputes). We do not wish to prejudge that work by proposing that there should be a compulsory minimum term on this issue in the Act.Following the seminar on 19 December we are considering with the Law Commission how proposals for future provisions on the safeguarding of tenancy deposits could mesh in with what the Law Commission are proposing with regard to compulsory written agreements for all tenants.
§ Mr. Love:To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what assessment of the possible potential savings to health and social care budgets he has made from ensuring that a percentage of all new housing has wheelchair access; and if he will make a statement. [149609]
§ Yvette Cooper:All newly built homes must meet the requirements of Tart M' of the building regulations, which the Government revised in 1999 to improve the visitibility and convenience of new housing. The revised regulations include requirements to ensure that entrances, lifts, corridors, doorways and WCs are accessible, including to wheelchair users. The provisions are expected to enable occupants to cope better with reducing mobility and to live longer in their own homes, although not necessarily to facilitate folly independent living for all disabled people.
In addition, all new build schemes funded by the Government through the Housing Corporation must comply with the Corporation's scheme development standards, which adopt additional criteria for accessibility and internal environments.
No assessment has been made of the potential costs and benefits of setting a target for a proportion of all new housing to have particular standards of wheelchair access.
§ Mr. Love:To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what measures the Department will take to increase the number of new houses suitable for those who are wheelchair users. [149610]
§ Yvette Cooper:All newly built homes must currently meet the requirements of 'Part M' of the building regulations, which the Government revised in 1999 to improve the visitibility and convenience of new housing. The revised regulations include requirements to ensure that entrances, lifts, corridors, doorways and WCs are accessible, including to wheelchair users. The provisions are expected to enable occupants to cope better with reducing mobility and to live longer in their own homes, although not necessarily to facilitate fully independent living for all disabled people.
In addition, all new build schemes funded by the Government through the Housing Corporation must comply with the Corporation's scheme development standards which adopt additional criteria for accessibility and internal environments.
1467W
§ Mr. Laurence Robertson:To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if' he will make a statement on his policy on the building of houses on flood plains. [149919]
§ Keith Hill:Policy is contained in Planning Policy Guidance Note 25: Development and Flood Risk, published in July 2001.
§ Mr. Laurence Robertson:To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what discussions he has had with planning inspectors about the building of houses in flood plains; and if he will make a statement. [149920]
§ Keith Hill:Officials at the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister have briefed Planning Inspectors on the policies dealing with housing and flooding out in Planning Policy Guidance Notes 3 (Housing) and 25 (Development and Flood Risk). They also provide on request advice to the Inspectorate centrally and to individual Inspectors on questions about the policy stated in these documents, but not on the interpretation of policy in cases.
§ Mr. Hoyle:To ask the Deputy Prime Minister whether local planning authorities can refuse new housing applications in areas where (a) sewage and (b) flooding problems are known to exist. [150017]
§ Keith Hill:Problems with sewage and flooding are material considerations in whether nor not to approve new housing applications, and local planning authorities should refuse permission where these cannot be satisfactorily resolved. Guidance on sewerage is given in paragraph 19 of Annex 3 to Planning Policy Guidance Note 23: Planning and Pollution Control. The fact that flood risk is a criterion in allocating land in plans for housing development is stated in paragraph 31 of Planning Policy Guidance Note 3: Housing, and the suitability of land at different levels of risk from flooding for residential development is set out in Table 1 of Planning Policy Guidance Note 25: Development and Flood Risk.