§ Mr. PatersonTo ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the natural predators of the badger are, other than man; and what effect they exert on the United Kingdom badger population. [153961]
§ Mr. BradshawAdult badgers have no natural predators, other than man in Britain. It is not unusual, however, for badger cubs to be killed by dogs, foxes and sometimes by adult badgers1.
Table summary of badgers taken during trial operations to 12 January 2004 May 1998 to January 1999
May 1999 to January 2000
May 2000 to January 2001
May 2002 to January 2003
May 2003 to January 2004
Total Triplet Proactive (P) or Reactive (R) P R P R P R P R P R P R A 55 0 0 34 149 47 52 36 256 117 B 238 0 85 73 74 34 49 84 172 110 618 301 C 246 0 111 178 126 115 132 101 615 394 D 293 0 368 122 661 122 E 1744 0 96 62 258 126 1,098 188 F 451 0 248 145 103 290 802 435 G 428 0 205 172 144 84 777 256 H 162 0 231 16 71 143 464 159 I 219 0 175 94 394 94 J 441 0 187 0 628 0 Sub total 238 386 73 1,970 246 2,057 641 1,662 1,106 6,313 2,066 Total (P and R) 238 459 2,216 2,698 2,768 8,379 1Combined total for initial and follow-up cull completed in the same culling year Note: No data for May 2001-January 2002 when trial suspended due to FMD
§ Andrew GeorgeTo ask the Secretary of State for Environment. Food and Rural Affairs what targets have been set for the bovine TB testing of herds in the last five years for which figures are available; how many have been completed; and how long it will take to clear the backlog of required tests. [155082]
§ Mr. BradshawThe State Veterinary Service has two targets relating to TB testing of cattle herds:
348W
- 95 per cent. of herds to be tested within one month of the due date, and
- 100 per cent. of herds to be tested within three months of the due date.
The impact of non-human induced mortality on the national badger population has not been quantified.
1The Handbook of British Mammals (1991). Third Edition. Edited by G. B. Corbet and S. Harris. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
§ Andrew GeorgeTo ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many badgers have been culled in each of the(a) proactive and (b) inactive cull areas in each of the selected trial zones in each year since the trials commenced. [155081]
§ Mr. BradshawThe Randomised Badger Culling Trial compares 30 areas of 100 km2, grouped into 10 triplets. One of the following three "treatments" is allocated to each trial area:
'Proactive' culling whet e badgers are trapped and culled at the outset of the trial and at intervals afterwards.'Reactive' culling where badgers are trapped and culled from social groups associated with farms which have a confirmed incident of bovine TB during the course of the trial.'Survey only' areas where no trapping or culling takes place. Setts are surveyed regularly to check for signs of unlawful removal of badgers. These areas act as a scientific control against which the impact of the two culling strategies can be measured.Culling in the reactive areas of the trial has been suspended.
Details of the badgers culled in the proactive and reactive treatment areas are given in the following table:
The following table details the performance figures for the years where figures are available.
2001 2002 20031 Number of herds due to be tested 12,207 19,877 15,524 Completed tests within one month of the due date (percentage)
14.5 47.4 78.7 Completed tests within three months of the due date (percentage)
22.7 65.0 92.7 1to end September The number of tests overdue at the end of December 2003 was 3,623 of which only 163 were more than 12 months overdue (provisional data). This is similar to the number of overdue TB tests recorded before the FMD epidemic.
349WThe number of overdue TB tests has remained more or less stable since April 2003, with no significant trend up or down. It is therefore considered that the clearance of the backlog of TB tests, which accumulated during the FMD epidemic, has been completed.
§ Andrew GeorgeTo ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what budget was set by her Department for each year for all aspects of bovine TB research, testing, culling, compensation,
Expenditure on bovine TB in Great Britain: 1998–99 to 2002–03 Expenditure in £000 1998–99 1999–2000 2000–01 2001–02 2002–03 Compensation1 3,491 5,303 6,632 9,243 31,146 TB testing 7,247 8,329 8,675 3,571 12,398 Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT) and associated research 2,988 4,392 6,630 6,001 6,479 Other research (not including RBCT) 2,541 4,114 5,266 6,112 6,824 Other costs2 8,617 9,002 8,996 5,557 17,055 Total (rounded figures) 24,883 31,141 36,199 30,485 73,902 1Includes compensation paid for cattle and deer slaughtered as a result of TB control measures. 2Includes State Veterinary Service staff costs and diagnosis carried out by the Veterinary Laboratories Agency. Fieldwork costs are included in the expenditure shown for the RBCT and associated research.