HC Deb 04 February 2004 vol 417 cc981-3W
Mr. Coleman

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what instructions were given to his Department's staff on the length of time of stay that asylum seekers were allowed in the UK before applying for asylum before section 55 of the Nationality, Asylum and Immigration Act 2001 was enforced; from when those instructions applied; and what the current instructions are; and from what date they applied; [146972]

(2)when he will publish revised National Asylum Support Service Policy Bulletin 75 on the application of section 55 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002; [151409]

(3)if he will publish the revised casework notes on the application of section 55 of the Nationality. Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, issued to the National Asylum Support Service caseworkers after 17 December 2003. [151418]

Beverley Hughes

Instructions on the operation of Section 55 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 first appeared in Policy Bulletin 75, published on 7 January 2003. Revised instructions appear in Policy Bulletin 75 version 3, published 11 April 2003.

My right hon. Friend the Home Secretary announced on 17 December 2003 that asylum applicants who could give a credible explanation of the way in which they arrived in the UK and who had made a claim for asylum within three days of arrival would be considered to have applied as soon as reasonably practicable.

In view of the interest in the operation of section 55, a new revised edition of Policy Bulletin 75 which will include guidance to National Asylum Support Service caseworkers, will be published in February.

Mrs. Curtis-Thomas

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what further research has been conducted since July 2002 on why asylum seekers seek asylum in Britain rather than elsewhere; on what size of sample such research was based; and from which countries the participants originated. [148041]

Beverley Hughes

Since the publication of the Home Office report "Understanding the decision-making of asylum seekers" (Home Office Research Series 243/Findings 172) in July 2002, there has been no further research undertaken by the Home Office which focuses specifically on why asylum seekers choose to come to the United Kingdom in preference to other possible destinations.

The Immigration and Nationality Directorate carries out analysis of asylum statistics and findings from other studies to assess likely trends in asylum intake figures.

The Research Development and Statistics Directorate of the Home Office is in the process of agreeing its 2004–05 research programme. It is likely that further investigations into the decision-making of asylum applicants and other migrants will form a part of this programme.

Siobhain McDonagh

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many asylum applicants who are citizens of Sri Lanka were given permission to stay in the UK in(a) 2000, (b) 2001, (c) 2002 and (d) 2003; and how many applications were refused in each of these years. [148422]

Beverley Hughes

[pursuant to his answer, 21 January 2004, Official Report, c. 1269 W]: Due to an administrative error the figures for Sri Lanka were not the most current figures available. The corrected version of the answer is in the table.

Initial decisions on asylum applications1,2 received in the United Kingdom, excluding dependants, by year, nationals of Sri Lanka
Principal applicants
Decisions
Sri Lanka Total decisions Grants of asylum Grants of Exceptional Leave to Remain Grants of Humanitarian Protection Grants of Discretionary Leave Total refusals3 Grants of Exceptional Leave to Remain under backlog criteria4,5 Non compliance refusals under backlog criteria4,6
2000 9,050 900 285 n/a n/a 6,875 895 100
20017 10,350 1,440 540 n/a n/a 8,370 n/a n/a
20028 4,285 340 275 n/a n/a 3,670 n/a n/a
January to September 20038 1,265 20 55 35 1,155 n/a n/a
n/a = not applicable
1 Provisional figures rounded to nearest 5.
2 Information is of initial determination decisions, excluding the outcome of appeals or other subsequent decisions.
3 May include some refusals under non compliance grounds.
4 Cases decided under pragmatic measures aimed at reducing the pre 1996 asylum backlog.
5 May include a small number of cases where asylum has been granted.
6 May include a small number of cases where the application has been refused on substantive grounds.
7 Revised figures
8 Provisional figures

The table shows the available data, for outcomes of appeals relating to refused asylum applications (principal applicants) for nationals of Sri Lanka in 2000, 2001, 2002 and from January to September 2003.

Outcome of Appeals1,2 determined by adjudicators of the Immigration Appellate Authority, excluding dependants, nationals of Sri Lanka, 2001 to September 2003
Number of principal appellants
Appeals determined by adjudicators2
Allowed Dismissed Withdrawn
Total Total As percentage of Determined Total As percentage of Determined Total As percentage of Determined
2001 4,830 1,810 37 2,900 60 120 2
2002 6,435 1,455 23 4,880 76 100 2
January to September 2003 4,710 580 12 4,015 85 110 2
1 Provisional figures rounded to nearest 5 (except percentages) with '*' = 1 or 2. Figures may not add up due to independent rounding.
2 Figures include cases withdrawn by the Home Office, as well as the appellant.

Information on asylum applications and decisions is published quarterly. The next publication will be available on the 24 February 2004 on the Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate website at http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/immigration1.html.

Forward to