§ Mr. BurstowTo ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer pursuant to his answer of 15 January 2003,Official Report, columns 661–62W, on Capita, if he will give the (a) start and finish date, (b) value, (c) evaluation mechanism for successful delivery and (d) penalty charges for failure to deliver for each contract; whether penalty charges have been incurred; what the service level agreements were; what the contract numbers were; and if he will make a statement. [97334]
§ Ruth KellyIt has been drawn to my attention that there were errors in my earlier answers about Capita of 13 March 2002,Official Report, column 1113W, and 15 January 2003, Official Report, column 662W. I apologise for this earlier inaccuracy, which I very much regret.
The following information is given separately in respect of each of the Chancellor's Departments.
HM Treasury
In my earlier answers I stated that the Treasury had placed work with Capita under a single framework agreement for external recruitment with no defined value. At that time, no such framework agreement was in place: service orders were therefore being placed individually at a total cost of £170,847 (excluding VAT) in 2001–02. Spending during 2002–03 was £279,697 (excluding VAT). Details of the seventeen orders during this period are given in the following table. For reasons of commercial confidentiality it is not possible to list individual contract values. Exemption 13 of the Code of Practice on Access to Government Information applies, ((a) and (b)).
Delivery is assessed through internal mechanisms for review of the staff recruited. No penalty clauses or service level agreements were put in place: service requirements were specified for each piece of work, ((c) and (d)).
791W
Title of post Start date Completion date HR consultant 27 May 2002 27 June 2002 Customer Relations Manager 6 March 2002 12 April 2002 Customer Relations Advisor 11 July 2002 2 August 2002 Accounting Policies Manager and Accountancy Advisor 7 May 2002 7 June 2002 Head of information services 25 July 2002 9 September 2002 HR Team Leader and HR Diversity Officer 26 November 2002 10 January 2003 Quality Manager 17 June 2002 19 July 2002 Head of Learning, Skills and Development 9 January 2003 3 February 2003 Development Consultant 16 January 2003 28 February 2003 Gold System Manager 22 January 2003 13 February 2003 Website Editor 22 January 2003 14 February 2003 Project and Programme Managers and Knowledge Manager 29 January 2003 28 February 2003 PA to Managing Director 3 February 2003 28 February 2003 Senior Programmer/Analyst 24 February 2003 21 March 2003 Policy Analysts 26 February 2003 4 April 2003 Senior Policy Analyst 28 March 2003 25 April 2003 Second Permanent Secretary— Managing Director, Budget and Public Finances and Head of Government Economies Services 16 April 2003 20 May 2003 Inland Revenue (IR)
IR has two competitively procured management consultancy framework arrangements with Capita. One starts on the 1 April 2002 and runs until 30 September 2003. The other runs from 1 September 2002 until 29 February 2004. Neither contract has yet been used by IR. Accordingly, no IR contract values are associated with these arrangements, ((a) and (b)).
Evaluation criteria will be drawn up for each requirement under the framework, (c).
Neither penalty clauses or Service Level Agreements are associated with these frameworks. The requirement will be stated in the order/contract for each piece of work and the supplier will be judged on their ability to meet that requirement, (d).
H.M. Customs and Excise HMCE
Within the following broad headings, during 2002–03, HMCE have awarded the following work to Capita under one of IR's management consultancy framework agreements. The start and finish dates for the individual contracts could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
- Maximum return on Investment Training
- Membership Subscription
- Promoting Flexible Working Practices
- Managing Change Training
- e-Learning Training
- Leadership Training
- GORS Selection Interview Training
- Training Administration Introduction
- NLP Training
- IT Tests
- Talent Spotting
- Professional Skills for SEC
- Business Writing
- Taking Responsibility Training
- Civil Service Reform Training
- AA/A0 Assessment Tests
- Training Evaluation
- Legal Trainees
- Fast Stream Recruitment
- Advanced Assertiveness for Managers Training
792W - Complaints Training
- Leadership Training
- Positive Image Training
- Assistant Print Buyer
- Access to Personal Information Training
- Time Management Training
- Data Protection Training
- Belfast Building Work
- Diagnostic Internal Communications Manager
- Feedback
- RAS Helpline
- Thinking on your feet
- GLS Lawyers Recruitment
- Human Resources Manager
- Communication Training
- Internal Communications Manager
- Effective Middle Management
- Human Resources
- Customer Contact Centre Advisor
- Instant Recruitment—EO
- In House Training (Feedback Skills)
- Selection Test
- Interviewing: The Selection Techniques
- In house training (Coaching)
- Diversity in the Civil Service
For reasons of commercial confidentiality, it is not possible to list individual contract values. Exemption 13 of the Code of Practice on Access to Government Information applies. In total, the value for the services listed is £238,097 (excluding VAT), ((a) and (b)).
Evaluation criteria were drawn up for each requirement under the Framework. The information required under detailed analyses (c) could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Office of Government Commerce OGC
To clarify my earlier answers, Capita Property Consultancy and two other consultancy companies were appointed to provide property related advice and services under the terms of a competitively tendered framework agreement from 16 August 2001 to 15 August 2004, with the option to extend for a further two years. At time of posting the tender notice in the 793W Official Journal of the European Community, the estimated total cost of the agreement was £200,000 per annum. However, no spend has yet been made through the framework, ((a) and (b)).
The evaluation mechanism for successful delivery is covered by OGC buying. solutions customer care programme that comprises customer feedback on overall quality of service provider (understanding of requirement, speed of response, quality of administration and timescales met), (c).
Penalty clauses do not form part of the terms and conditions of the framework agreement, (d.)
In addition, during 2001–02, the OGC placed individual service orders with Capita to the value of £159,170 (excluding VAT). And during 2002–03, OGC used one Capita consultant under a contract. The contract with Capita was concluded in May 2002 when the consultant was subsequently employed by OGC on a fixed term contract. The total sum paid to Capita over the 2002–03 period was £46, 519 (excluding VAT), ((a) and (b)).
Neither penalty clauses or a Service Level Agreement were appropriate for this contract, (c.)
Nevertheless, the evaluation of the value for money for the payment was on the basis of the successful achievement of the objectives set for the programme of work to which the individual contributed, (d).