HC Deb 03 July 2003 vol 408 cc404-7W
Andrew George

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many payments to farmers were completed after the target date by the Rural Payments Agency in each month in(a) 2000–01, (b) 2001–02, (c) 2002–03 and (d) 2003–04 to date, broken down by type. [122843]

Alun Michael

Since the Rural Payments Agency was established on 16 October 2001 the number of payments made to farmers after the target date is as follows.

2001–02 Scheme October November December January February March
F&V Withdrawal 2
OTMS Deadweight 3
OTMS Incineration 1 3 13 3 1
OTMS Mincing 4 3 2
Main AAPS Payments 2114 355
SAPS 4 2 1
BSPS 49 41 1 15

ERDP Schemes are subject to rolling payment deadlines that are calculated from the date an individual claim is received by the Rural Development Service who administer the schemes on behalf of the Rural Payments Agency (RPA). The exception being the Hill Farm allowance which is administered by RPA and has a target of 95 per cent. of payments to be made by the end of March.

2002–03 Scheme April May June July August September
OTMS Liveweight
OTMS Incineration
OTMS Mincing
Main MRS Payments 16 20 11 25 5 11
Non Food Set-Aside 150 20 20 10 3 5
SAPS
BSPS 5 4 8 5,800
SCPS 1,982
SPS 5,565
EPS 948
2002–03 Scheme October November December January February March
OTMS Liveweight 14
OTMS Incineration 4
OTMS Mincing 3 3
Main MRS Payments 341 98
Non Food Set-Aside 1
SAPS 3 5 2 2 2
BSPS 4,396 1,894 954 776 791 550
SCPS 2,109 982 319 634 883 424
SPS 7,433 3,026 3,925 1,832 5,128 3,663
EPS 488 385 117 125 222 166

ERDP Schemes are subject to rolling payment deadlines that are calculated from the date an individual claim is received by the Rural Development Service who administer the schemes on behalf of the Rural Payments Agency (RPA). The exception being the Hill Farm Allowance which is administered by RPA and has a target of 95 per cent. of payments to be made by the end of March.

2002 Scheme Total number of claims Claims processed after target date
Countryside Stewardship Scheme 19,790 3,364
Environmentally Sensitive Areas I-III 7,458 2,162
Environmentally Sensitive Areas IV 3,120 62
Farm Woodland Premium Scheme 7,683 230
Organic Farming Scheme 1,489 148
Processing and Marketing Grant 61 11

2001 Scheme Total number of claims Claims processed after target date
Countryside Stewardship Scheme 9,359 2,901
Environmentally Sensitive Areas I-III 8,336 1,167
Environmentally Sensitive Areas IV 3,127 187
Farm Woodland Premium Scheme 6,464 3,813
Organic Farming Scheme 1,242 322
Energy Crops Scheme 15 2
Processing and Marketing Grant 17 3
Rural Enterprise Scheme 229 39
Vocational Training Scheme 70 6

2002 Scheme Total number of claims Claims processed after target date
Rural Enterprise Scheme 898 197
Vocational Training Scheme 223 22
Hill Farm Allowance 11,116 222
2003–04 Scheme April May June
Main AAPS Payments 17 25
Non Food Set-Aside 242 33
SAPS 15 8 46
BSPS 259 193 223
SCPS 107 3
SPS 3,083 707 422
EPS 47 41 23

ERDP Schemes are subject to rolling payment deadlines that are calculated from the date an individual claim is received by the Rural Development Service who administer the schemes on behalf of the Rural Payments Agency (RPA). The exception being the Hill Farm Allowance which is administered by RPA and has a target of 95 per cent. of payments to be made by the end of March.

2003 Scheme Total number of claims Claims processed after target date
Organic Farming Scheme 694 146
Rural Enterprise Scheme 253 38
Vocational Training Scheme 70 4

Mr. Hayes

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what actions her Department is taking to deal with administrative problems across the border between England and Wales in processing payments by the Rural Payments Agency. [122520]

Alun Michael

The Rural Payments Agency (RPA) and National Assembly for Wales Agriculture and Rural Affairs Department (NAWARAD) are in regular communication in respect of subsidy claims which cover land and animals, in both England and Wales. The majority of such claims which have been validated have received at least interim payments.

In addition, automated interfaces are being developed between England and Wales for the bovine schemes.