HL Deb 10 February 2003 vol 644 cc65-72WA
Baroness Goudie

asked Her Majesty's Government:

Whether they are now in a position to announce the details of the Planning Delivery Grant for 2003–04 [HL1586].

Lord Evans of Temple Guiting

Yes. As the noble Baroness knows, the Deputy Prime Minister announced last July that we would be making an additional £350 million available to local authorities over the period 2003–06 to improve the delivery of planning services. We have now decided the basis on which we will distribute this new Planning Delivery Grant in 2003–04 and will be informing recipients of their allocations.

The grant is being paid out of additional resources from Spending Review 2002. The aim of the grant is to improve the planning system to ensure the effective delivery of our objectives for sustainable communities which we set out in the document Sustainable Communities: Building for the Future. It is specifically targeted towards meeting the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's Public Service Agreements 5 and 6. PSA 5 aims to achieve a better balance between housing availability and demand. PSA 6 requires all authorities to have local development frameworks in place (in accordance with agreed local development schemes) and to meet the best value development control targets by the end of 2006–07.

The amount of grant distributed in 2003–04 is £50 million. It will be paid to local planning authorities, regional planning bodies and the Greater London Authority. The grant is a performance reward grant and rewards local authorities both for improvements towards and achievement of best value development control targets in the period June 2001 to June 2002. Those meeting the development control handling targets both at the start and the end of the year are rewarded separately for consistently high performance. No authority will receive an allocation of less than £75,000 in 2003–04 so that every authority has additional resources to help drive improvement in performance towards the targets. The grant allocations are enhanced for those local authorities within the high housing demand and growth areas identified in the document Sustainable Communities: Building for the future.

Regional planning bodies were notified in December of their share of the £6 million of existing funding which will, from 2003–04, be paid directly to them. They will also receive a share of the new planning delivery grant for their work on new regional spatial strategies (due to replace regional planning guidance under the Bill) and their review of existing regional planning guidance to take account of the growth area proposals. The Greater London Authority receives grant to assist its related review of elements of the London Plan.

County councils will not receive direct resources from the grant. The counties' planning functions are being changed under the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill currently before Parliament. Subject to Royal Assent, county councils will cease to have a duty to prepare structure plans but their resources will not be reduced accordingly. Therefore, while in some cases counties may need to continue with structure plan preparation over the next year and possibly beyond, given the transitional period set out in the Bill, as this function winds down they will be able to take advantage of freed up resources. It will be important that these freed up resources and the expertise available in county councils are retained and used to deliver other county planning responsibilities and to undertake their function as statutory consultees in the preparation of regional spatial strategies and local development frameworks. Counties can be engaged to conduct work related to regional spatial strategies on an agency basis.

The criteria for grant allocations have been designed to drive up performance in the delivery of planning functions, both in respect of development control and plan making. Authorities should be aware that they will need to continue to secure improvements in performance in order to receive money in further years. Grant allocations are not ring-fenced and authorities have complete discretion in the way they spend this money. Areas that authorities may consider concentrating on include: contribution to the preparation of regional planning guidance and the future regional spatial strategies; completing current reviews of existing development plans and preparing for the new system of local development frameworks; better resourcing of IT systems; assistance from consultants; outsourcing of certain planning services; increasing staffing levels; training for staff and councillors; supporting mediation services; encouraging a more diverse planning workforce; bursaries for employees to gain planning qualifications and more use of technical staff.

The amounts payable are shown in the tables below.

Letters to all leaders of local and county planning authorities, chief executives of the regional planning bodies and the Mayor of London have been laid in the Libraries of the House. They set out the details of each recipient's grant.

We will be laying a special grant report before the other place shortly.

Table 1: Total Planning Delivery Grant (£) for 2003–04
£
Adur 138,189
Allerdale 151,179
Alnwick 75,000
Amber Valley 75,000
Arun 137,500
Ashfield 181,650
Ashford 163,816
Aylesbury Vale 203,206

Table 1: Total Planning Delivery Grant (£)for 2003–04
£
Babergh 75,000
Barking and Dagenham 150,758
Barnet 458,095
Barnsley 75,000
Barrow-in-Furness 75,000
Basildon 208,346
Basingstoke and Deane 203,463
Bassetlaw 75,000
Bath and North East Somerset UA 133,008
Bedford 203,206
Berwick-upon-Tweed 75,000
Bexley 236,793
Birmingham 75,000
Blaby 75,000
Blackburn with Darwen UA 75,000
Blackpool UA 75,000
Blyth Valley 75,000
Bolsover 75,000
Bolton 75,000
Boston 75,000
Bournemouth UA 157,781
Bracknell Forest UA 121,875
Bradford 75,000
Braintree 275,158
Breckland 88,297
Brent 283,364
Brentwood 108,480
Bridgnorth 75,000
Brighton and Hove UA 121,875
Bristol UA 189,258
Broadland 75,000
Broads Authority 75,000
Bromley 241,106
Bromsgrove 189,943
Broxbourne 101,316
Broxtowe 75,000
Burnley 75,000
Bury 125,400
Calderdale 75,400
Cambridge 101,316
Camden 223,407
Cannock Chase 75,000
Canterbury 200,070
Caradon 75,000
Carlisle 75,000
Carrick 97,304
Castle Morpeth 75,000
Castle Point 158,757
Charnwood 94,248
Chelmsford 137,500
Cheltenham 75,000
Cherwell 278,812
Chester 75,000
Chesterfield 75,000
Chester-le-Street 75,000
Chichester 336,900
Chiltern 249,282
Chorley 75,000
Christchurch 75,814
City of London 75,000
Colchester 137,500
Congleton 75,000
Copeland 129,735
Corby 115,100
Cotswold 232,085
Coventry 75,000
Craven 100,555
Crawley 109,091
Crewe and Nantwich 75,000
Croydon 219,955
Dacorum 229,265
Darlington UA 89,770

Table 1: Total Planning Delivery Grant (£) for 2003–04
£
Dartford 148,191
Dartmoor NP 75,000
Daventry 101,316
Derby UA 134,206
Derbyshire Dales 75,000
Derwentside 75,000
Doncaster 111,189
Dover 109,091
Dudley 207,414
Durham 83,569
Ealing 121,875
Easington 75,000
East Cambridgeshire 126,617
East Devon 75,000
East Dorset 75,000
East Hampshire 272,875
East Hertfordshire 163,542
East Lindsey 75,000
East Northamptonshire 107,684
East Riding of Yorkshire UA 213,853
East Staffordshire 75,000
Eastbourne 109,091
Eastleigh 173,009
Eden 207,267
Ellesmere Port and Neston 75,000
Elmbridge 254,351
Enfield 186,316
Epping Forest 199,600
Epsom and Ewell 75,000
Erewash 82,836
Exeter 100,000
Exmoor NP 75,000
Fareham 132,211
Fenland 113,199
Forest Heath 75,000
Forest of Dean 75,000
Fylde 75,000
Gateshead 201,962
Gedling 75,000
Gloucester 75,000
Gosport 75,000
Gravesham 124,878
Great Yarmouth 75,000
Greenwich 200,000
Guildford 75,000
Hackney 121,875
Halton UA 160,000
Hambleton 147,416
Hammersmith and Fulham 157,020
Harborough 214,061
Haringey 255,952
Harlow 181,028
Harrowgate 75,000
Harrow 251,783
Hart 109,091
Hartlepool UA 150,460
Hastings 146,840
Havant 75,000
Havering 171,591
Herefordshire UA 326,145
Hertsmere 75,000
High Peak 75,000
Hillingdon 320,040
Hinckley and Bosworth 75,000
Horsham 177,256
Hounslow 404,246
Huntingdonshire 141,866
Hyndburn 97,980
Ipswich 75,000
Isle of Wight U A 166,588
Isles of Scilly 101,965
Islington 237,532
Kennet 75,000

Table 1: Total Planning Delivery Grant (£) for 2003–04
£
Kensington and Chelsea 178,865
Kerrier 75,000
Kettering 136,309
King's Lynn and West Norfolk 75,000
Kingston upon Thames 195,300
Kingston-upon-Hull UA 109,981
Kirklees 75,000
Knowsley 165,505
Lake District NP 75,000
Lambeth 330,617
Lancaster 75,000
Leeds 75,000
Leicester UA 119,296
Lewes 75,000
Lewisham 184,375
Lichfield 111,461
Lincoln 104,952
Liverpool 250,982
Luton UA 203,267
Macclesfield 288,603
Maidstone 280,076
Maldon 75,000
Malvern Hills 75,000
Manchester 251,537
Mansfield 85,963
Medway UA 264,462
Melton 138,634
Mendip 75,000
Merton 195,450
Mid Bedfordshire 187,855
Mid Devon 140,627
Mid Suffolk 75,000
Mid Sussex 132,681
Middlesbrough UA 158,038
Milton Keynes UA 348,120
Mole Valley 75,000
New Forest 109,091
Newark and Sherwood 77,253
Newcastle upon Tyne 75,000
Newcastle-under-Lyme 164,755
Newham 201,503
North Cornwall 106,149
North Devon 148,241
North Dorset 138,788
North East Derbyshire 112,340
North East Lincolnshire UA 75,000
North Hertfordshire 148,191
North Kesteven 75,000
North Lincolnshire UA 99,889
North Norfolk 75,000
North Shropshire 75,000
North Somerset UA 75,000
North Tyneside 75,000
North Warwickshire 75,313
North West Leicestershire 75,000
North Wiltshire 123,305
North Yorkshire Moors NP 75,000
Northampton 169,285
Northumberland NP 75,000
Norwich 75,000
Nottingham UA 75,000
Nuneaton and Bedworth 75,000
Oadby and Wigston 75,000
Oldham 75,000
Owestry 75,000
Oxford 174,294
Peak NP 75,000
Pendle 75,000
Penwith 75,000
Peterborough UA 77,843
Plymouth UA 75,000
Poole UA 182,279
Portsmouth UA 137,500

Table 1: Total Planning Delivery Grant (£) for 2003–04
£
Preston 122,151
Purbeck 75,000
Reading UA 203,648
Redbridge 197,789
Redcar and Cleveland UA 75,000
Redditch 75,000
Reigate and Banstead 109,091
Restormel 191,936
Ribble Valley 75,000
Richmondshire 87,304
Richmond-upon-Thames 299,968
Rochdale 115,401
Rochford 156,036
Rossendale 75,000
Rother 75,000
Rotherham 188,698
Rugby 75,000
Runnymede 139,569
Rushcliffe 75,000
Rushmoor 85,695
Rutland UA 99,039
Ryedale 75,000
Salford 75,000
Salisbury 109,688
Sandwell 75,000
Scarborough 75,000
Sedgefield 103,484
Sedgemoor 75,000
Sefton 286,592
Selby 101,549
Sevenoaks 108,508
Sheffield 75,000
Shepway 109,091
Shrewsbury and Atcham 75,000
Slough UA 166,681
Solihull 75,000
South Bedfordshire 135,407
South Buckinghamshire 75,000
South Cambridgeshire 116,667
South Derbyshire 75,000
South Gloucestershire UA 153,702
South Hampshire 75,000
South Holland 75,000
South Kesteven 112,488
South Lakeland 75,000
South Norfolk 75,000
South Northamptonshire 186,876
South Oxfordshire 137,500
South Ribble 75,000
South Shropshire 115,864
South Somerset 140,728
South Staffordshire 75,000
South Tyneside 85,254
Southampton UA 124,029
Southend on Sea UA 116,667
Southwark 225,790
Spelthorne 75,926
St Albans 109,091
St Edmundsbury 79,076
St Helens 75,000
Stafford 165,858
Staffordshire Moorlands 75,000
Stevenage 75,000
Stockport 294,100
Stockton-on-Tees UA 75,000
Stoke on Trent UA 99,461
Stratford-on-Avon 118,587
Stroud 75,000
Suffolk Coastal 75,000
Sunderland 110,170

Table 1: Total Planning Delivery Grant (£) for 2003–04
£
Surrey Heath 167,324
Sutton 109,091
Swale 179,167
Swindon UA 75,000
Tameside 75,000
Tamworth 100,000
Tandridge 266,668
Taunton Deane 75,000
Teesdale 75,000
Teignbridge 156,222
Telford and Wrekin UA 75,000
Tendring 253,159
Test Valley 295,525
Tewkesbury 125,675
Thanet 118,945
Three Rivers 106,503
Thurrock UA 179,167
Tonbridge and Mailing 109,091
Torbay UA 75,000
Torridge 75,000
Tower Hamlets 224,039
Trafford 238,831
Tunbridge Wells 75,000
Tynedale 75,000
Uttlesford 246,201
Vale of White Horse 128,821
Vale Royal 225,115
Wakefield 75,000
Walsall 100,199
Waltham Forest 109,091
Wandsworth 246,513
Wansbcck 75,000
Warrington UA 75,000
Warwick 75,000
Watford 75,000
Waveney 75,000
Waverley 75,000
Wealden 192,964
Wear Valley 75,000
Wellingborough 108,383
Welwyn Hatfield 75,000
West Berkshire UA 268,281
West Devon 77,159
West Dorset 75,000
West Lancashire 75,000
West Lindsey 75,000
West Oxfordshire 121,875
West Somerset 75,000
West Wiltshire 75,000
Westminster 474,679
Weymouth and Portland 75,000
Wigan 210,441
Winchester 297,062
Windsor and Maidenhead UA 227,499
Wirral 267,697
Woking 166,989
Wokingham UA 170,019
Wolverhampton 120,263
Worcester 75,000
Worthing 219,977
Wychavon 254,927
Wycombe 109,091
Wyre 108,801
Wyre Forest 108,105
York UA 75,000
Yorkshire Dales NP 75,000

Table 2: Planning Delivery Grant for Regional Planning Bodies and the GLA for 2003–04
£
East Midlands Region Local Government Association 365,000
East of England Local Government Conference 516,000
Greater London Authority 75,000
Regional Assembly for the North East 263,000
North West Regional Assembly 369,000
South East Regional Assembly 581,000
South West Regional Assembly 324,000
West Midlands Local Government Association 332,000
Regional Assembly for Yorkshire and the Humber 325,000

Forward to