HC Deb 23 October 2002 vol 391 cc322-3W
Dr. Tonge

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what discussions she has had with the UNHCR regarding the repatriation of refugees to Afghanistan; and if she will make a statement. [74886]

Clare Short

I met with the High Commissioner for Refugees on 4 July when we discussed UK support to Afghanistan and other issues. Our officials remain in close contact.

My department has provided significant support to UNHCR to assist with the repatriation of refugees to Afghanistan. Since September 2001, the UK has contributed over £5 million to UNHCR for their programmes of assistance to Afghan refugees. In addition we have provided over £3.5 million to the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) for assistance to internally displaced persons (IDPs) and returnees to Afghanistan. We are also supporting a number of other humanitarian programmes which will help to create an environment for the sustainable return of both refugees and IDPs.

In addition, earlier this month the governments of Afghanistan and the United Kingdom and UNHCR signed a tripartite Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) setting out a detailed framework for the voluntary repatriation of Afghans residing in the UK and their reintegration back in Afghanistan. Under the agreement, UNHCR will provide information and counselling to Afghans in the UK—to ensure that any decision to repatriate is taken in the "full knowledge of the facts". UNHCR will also monitor the voluntariness of the returns prior to departure, as well as other aspects of the agreement—a role that both states have pledged to respect. Similarly, once returnees are back in Afghanistan, the agency has guaranteed access to them from the moment they land at the airport. UNHCR believes that the MoU contains all the necessary safeguards to ensure that Afghans who still need international refugee protection continue to receive it and that returns under the agreement would be sustainable. A similar tripartite agreement had earlier been signed with the French government. It is hoped that the MoU will become a model for other countries who are interested in offering assisted voluntary repatriation for Afghans.

Dr. Tonge

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development how much of the financial assistance committed by donor countries for the first year of the reconstruction of Afghanistan has been disbursed since January 2002, broken down by donor country. [74885]

Clare Short

I attach a table of estimated disbursals produced by the Afghan Assistance Coordination Authority (AACA). This was produced for the recent Implementation Group meeting in Afghanistan and outlines donor's pledges, commitments and disbursals for 2002, as known to the AACA. It is currently estimated that overall 67 per cent. of 2002's pledge has been disbursed.

Table 1: Transitional Government Data on Donor Pledges, and 2002 Commitments and Disbursements
V = 11 October 2002
Donor Amount pledged at Tokyo (Grant + Loan) (donor currency) Amount pledged at Tokyo (Grant + Loan) (US$m) Amount pledged at Tokyo as Grants (US$m) Over how many years? Amount of any Additional Pledge (US$m) Over how many years? Total Overall Pledge (Tokyo + Additional) Rough annual Pledge for 2002 Commitment against Tokyo + Additional Pledges Disbursement against Tokyo/Additional Pledges Disbursements as % of 2002 Pledge Comment
ADB 500 85 2.5 500 50 50.0 0.7 1.4
Aga Khan 75 75 75 16.2 8.2 Pledge 2002 not avail
Austria 10 10 2.5 10 4 Unknown
Australia A$17m. 9 9 1 2 1 11 11 7.7 7.7 72.2 Estimate
Belgium Euro 33 m. 28 28 5 28 9 8.1 7.2 80.0 Estimate
Canada CDN․100m. 63 63 1.25 63 63 31.3 31.3 49.9
China 1 1 1 150 5 151 31 31.0 30.0 96.8
Denmark DKK500m. 60 60 5 46 2 106 28 28.0 16.5 58.9
EC (Recon supp) Euro 1000 m. 864 864 5 864 173 182.5 78.4 45.4
EC (Hum.—ECHO) 65 1 65 65 58.0 45.0 69.5
Finland Euro 30 m. 26 26 3 26 10 10.0 7.9 79.0 Estimate
France Euro 26 m. 22 22 1 10 1 32 32 34.2 27.8 86.9 Estimate
Germany Euro 320m. 276 276 4 43 1 320 113 112.6 120.6 107.1
India 100 100 1 100 100 31.7 31.7 31.7
Iran (Islamic Rep) 560 560 6 560 50 40.0 32.7 65.4
Ireland Euro 12m 10 10 3 2 1 12 5 6.8 6.8 123.6
Islamic Dev Bank Unknown
Italy 43 43 1 10 1 53 53 39.7 24.1 45.5
Japan 500 500 2.5 92 2 592 250 259.0 209.0 83.6
Korea (Rep. of) 45 45 2.5 45 10 10.0 2.2 22.0 Pledge duration
Kuwait 30 30 n.a. 30 30 1.6 2.1 7.0 unconfirm
Luxembourg Euro 5 m. 4 4 1 4 4 4.9 0.1 2.3 Estimate
Netherlands Euro 70 m. 60 60 1 5 1 65 65 68.7 68.7 105.0
Norway NOK 350m. 40 40 1 40 40 40.0 32.0 80.0
Pakistan 100 50 5 100 50 50.0 17.7 35.4 See Note 6
Russian Fed. Unknown
Saudi Arabia 220 220 4 220 55 27.1 27.1 49.3
Spain Euro 120 m. 104 104 5 104 21 6.4 6.4 30.7 Estimate
Sweden SEK 750–1000 m. 90 90 3 90 30 18.5 18.5 61.7
Switzerland 20 20 2 20 12 11.0 9.0 75.0
Taiwan 29 29 3 29 10 Unknown
Turkey 5 5 5 5 2 2.2 2.2 100.0
UAE 36 36 n.a. 36 Unknown
United Kingdom £200 m. 288 288 5 55 1 343 130 91.6 77.5 59.6
USA 297 297 1 143 2 440 297 360.0 360.0 121.2
World Bank 570 100 3 570 150 100.0 9.6 6.4 See Note 7
Total: 5,087 4,151 623 5,710 1,952 1,738.7 1,318.5 67.5

Notes:

1 These are indicative estimates based on information provided to the Transitional Government to date; AACA is moving to project based aggregations based on entries in AACA's Donor Assistance Database (http://aacadad.undp.org)

2 The figures in Table 1 represent the commitments and disbursements made since the Tokyo Pledging on 22 January 2002;

3 Table 2 reflects the substantial support also provided to Afghanistan in 2001 by many donors.

4 Exchange rates: Pledges made in currencies other than the US Dollar have been converted at the exchange rate prevailing in January.

5 Exchange rates: Commitments and Disbursements have been converted at the average rate effective January and 4 October 2002.

6 Grant over one year;

7 US$470m incl some grants (up to approx $110m)

Source:

Transitional Government of Afghanistan, AACA Aid Coordination Unit

Please email any comments or corrections to aidan.cox@undp.org and najeeb.azizi@afganistangov.org