§ Mr. JenkinsTo ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the position of(a) Tamworth and (b) Sutton Coldfield constituencies is in the national table of deprivation. [84174]
§ Mrs. RocheThe table shows how all wards in the Tamworth and Sutton Coldfield constituencies are ranked according to the Index of Multiple Deprivation and the six other domains included in the Indices of Deprivation 2000 (ID 2000). Under the ID 2000, the most deprived ward is ranked 1, while the least deprived is ranked 8,414.
627W
Constituency/ward LA name Rank of index of multiple deprivation Rank of income domain Rank of employment domain Tamworth Bourne Vale Lichfield 4,965 6,550 6,411 Fazeley Lichfield 2,786 2,786 3,104 Little Aston Lichfield 8,117 8,371 7,655 Mease Valley Lichfield 4,915 5,159 7,266 Shenstone Lichfield 6,203 5,532 6,603 Stonnall Lichfield 7,537 7,209 6,826 Tame Lichfield 7,341 8,084 6,806 Amington Tamworth 2,569 2,187 3,520 Belgrave Tamworth 2,028 1,707 3,080 Bolehall Tamworth 2,425 3,568 3,071 Castle Tamworth 3,635 3,729 3,573 Glascote Tamworth 1,003 593 1,697 Mercian Tamworth 3,883 3,959 3,848 Spital Tamworth 3,382 3,049 2,878 Stonydelph Tamworth 2,255 2,076 4,096 Trinity Tamworth 5,315 5,892 6,297 Wilnecote Tamworth 3,962 4,183 5,274 Sutton Coldfield Sutton Four Oaks Birmingham 7,033 5,950 5,430 Sutton New Hall Birmingham 4,991 3,972 4,148 Sutton Vesey Birmingham 6,626 5,535 5,028
Constituency/ward LA name Rank of health domain Rank of education domain Rank of housing domain Rank of access domain Sutton Coldfield Sutton Four Oaks Birmingham 5,406 7,891 8,117 3,570 Sutton New Hall Birmingham 3,992 6,598 4,870 4,791 Sutton Vesey Birmingham 5,178 6,885 7,113 4,550