§ Mr. BradyTo ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what recent representations she has received on her policy relating to the provision of support towards the cost of independent school fees by her Department. [12005]
1996–97 Age at end of financial year Age retirement
Ill-health retirement Premature retirement
All retirements
Left for reasons other than
retirement
Less than 25 0 1 — 0 1 — 400 25 to 29 0 1 — 0 1 — 3,600 30 to 34 0 1 — 0 1 — 3,300 35 to 39 0 100 0 100 2,600 40 to 44 0 400 0 400 3,200 45 to 49 0 1,200 0 1,200 3,200 50 to 54 0 1,800 4,500 6,300 1,700 55 to 59 1 — 1,100 4,500 5,600 700 60 and over 1,700 100 1,300 3,200 200 Total 1,700 4,800 10,300 16,800 18,900 1 less than 50
408W
Age at end of financial year Age retirement
Ill-health retirement
Premature retirement
All retirements
Left for reasons other than
retirement
Less than 25 0 0 0 0 500 25 to 29 0 1 — 0 1 — 4,100 30 to 34 0 1 — 0 1 — 3,900 35 to 39 0 100 0 100 2,900 40 to 44 0 300 0 300 3,700
§ Mr. Timms[holding answer 2 November 200I]: Earlier this year I received representations from the Independent Schools Council and others on proposals for more open access to independent schools. Their proposals sought Government assistance to subsidise the cost of school fees that could not be met by children's parents. However, the Government have a manifesto commitment from 1997 to phase out the Assisted Places Scheme (APS) and to use the available resources to raise standards and enhance opportunities for children in maintained schools. Savings from phasing out the APS are going towards the significant reduction in infant class sizes, as demonstrated in the achievements of the past four years. Any new scheme that would assist relatively few children to attend independent schools would be incompatible with the long-standing commitment to phase out APS.