HC Deb 05 November 2001 vol 374 cc98-100W
Mr. Burstow

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will set out the methodology used to calculate the top and bottom 14 social services departments as set out in the publication of Social Services Performance Assessment Framework Indicators 2000–01 on 19 October. [10500]

Jacqui Smith

The methodology used to rank social services departments was as follows:

A council was classified as one of the best performing if: it was in the top one third of councils based on the proportion of indicators banded three or higher this year; and had on average three quarters or more of its indicators banded as three or higher over the past three years.

There were 15 councils in this category.

A council was classified as one of the least well performing if: it was in the bottom third of councils based on the proportion of indicators banded three or higher this year; and had on average 55 per cent. or less of its indicators banded as three or higher over the past three years.

Trust Project description Date full business case approval given Date financial close reached
Bay Community NHS Trust New Mentally Ill Unit 25 September 1998 30 September 1998
Birmingham Specialist Community Health NHS Trust Reprovision of accommodation for people with learning disabilities 12 February 1999 17 May 1999
Black Country Mental Health NHS Trust Mental Health Unit 6 October 1998 8 October 1998
Bradford Community Health NHS Trust Horton Park Centre—range of primary and community services including medical centres for GP practices, rehabilitation centre and Mental Health resource centre 26 November 1998 15 March 1999
Central Nottingham Healthcare NHS Trust Learning disability/Mental Health team base 30 March 2000 15 May 2000
Doncaster and South Humber NHS Trust Elderly Mental Health Services and Mental Health Rehabilitation Services 14 September 2001 17 September 2001
East London and the City Mental Health NHS Trust Mental Health reprovision 10 August 2000 30 July 2000
Enfield Community Care NHS Trust Elderly/Mentally Ill home 7 May 2000 9 May 2000
Leeds Community and Mental Health Services Teaching NHS Trust Reprovision of Mental Health Services, High Royds 28 February 2000 24 January 2001
Local Health Partnerships NHS Trust Mental health unit 15 August 2000 24 January 2001
North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust Reprovision of Mental Health facilities 29 November 1999 8 December 1999
Northern Birmingham Mental Health NHS Trust Reprovision of Mental Health facilities 9 August 2000 10 August 2000
Oxfordshire Mental Healthcare NHS Trust Mental Health Medium Secure Unit 1 June 1998 1 June 1998
Oxleas NHS Trust Reprovision of Mental Health 4 December 1998 11 December 1998
Redbridge Health Care NHS Trust Mental Health Reprovision and Geriatric Day Centre 27 June 2000 4 July 2000
Rotherham Priority Health Service NHS Trust Elderly Mental Health 19 March 1997 15 May 1998
Stockport NHS Trust New Mentally Ill Unit 18 September 1998 10 October 1999
Thames Gateway NHS Trust Acute Psychiatric—Stonehouse Hospital 14 December 1998 14 December 1998
West Berkshire Priority Care Services NHS Trust Prospect Park mental health redevelopment 1 February 2001 2 May 2001

Mr. Heald

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the occupancy rate of NHS mental health beds, excluding day only, is in each London hospital. [10531]

NHS Trust1 Available beds Occupied beds Occupancy rate (Percentage)
2000–01
Barnet Community Health Care 207 187 90.5
BHB Community Health 245 223 91.3
Brent, Kensington, Chelsea and Westminster Mental Health 732 621 84.8
Camden and Islington Community Health Service 358 352 98.2
Ealing, Hammersmith and Fulham Mental Health 567 543 95.8
East London and the City Mental Health 514 480 93.4

There were 14 councils in this category.

Banding of the performance indicators was introduced last year to help clarify what level of performance is generally good in relation to a performance indicator. Bands range from "investigate urgently" to "very good". Band three represents a council performing at a level which is "acceptable but with possible room for improvement".

Back to