HC Deb 04 December 2001 vol 376 cc287-9W
Mr. Chidgey

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (1) what the criteria are for prioritising the targets for the resurfacing of concrete trunk roads and motorways under the 10 year plan; [19790]

(2) what the annual budget is for the motorway and trunk road noise barrier programme; and when it will next be reviewed; [19792]

(3)if he will list, in order of priority, the projects in the noise barrier programme, together with the expected dates for the commencement of construction and anticipated cost of each project; [19794]

(4)when the (a) M27 between junctions 7 and 8 and(b) M3 between Southampton and Winchester were last subjected to condition surveys and maintenance cycle reviews; and what estimates were made of the time expected to elapse before resurfacing with low noise materials would be required; [19791]

(5) if he will list those noise barrier projects that (a) have been completed and (b) are under construction, indicating the construction cost of each project. [19793]

Mr. Jamieson

I have asked the Chief Executive of the Highways Agency, Tim Matthews, to reply to the hon. Gentleman.

Table A
Scheme name/description Quieter surfacing QS Noise barrier B Completed C under construction U Construction costs (£)
A19 Billingham Bypass B C 192,000
M6 J26–27 Orrell(l) B C 186,000
M1 J33–34 Tinsley B C 1,820,000
M1 J33–34 Brinsworth B C
M62 J31–32 Lower Altofts B C
M602 J1–2 Eccles B C 794,000
M42 J1 Lickey End B C 67,000

Letter from Tim Matthews to David Chidgey, dated 4 December 2001: I have been asked by the Transport Minister, David Jamieson, to reply to your recent Parliamentary Questions about the noise barrier programme, the criteria for prioritising resurfacing of concrete roads, and about the condition of the M27 between junctions 7 and 8 and the M3 between Southampton and Winchester. The Government recognised in "A New Deal For Trunk Roads in England" published in 1998 that traffic noise was becoming an increasing problem and stated that: Quieter road surfaces would be specified in all future contracts for new trunk roads; The most appropriate noise reducing surfaces are used whenever a road needs resurfacing where noise is a particular concern; and A budget would be established for noise mitigation measures to tackle some of the most serious and pressing problems on existing trunk roads. Traffic noise is therefore being tackled through programmes of quieter surfacing and noise mitigation measures, such as noise barriers. As a matter of policy, we use quieter surfaces whenever a road needs to be resurfaced and as part of the Government's 10 Year Transport Plan, we are tasked with resurfacing at least 60% of trunk roads, including all concrete roads, with quieter materials by 31 March 2011. The criteria to be used in deciding the priorities for resurfacing concrete roads were recently announced by Ministers and are as follows: That wherever possible the application of quieter surfaces will fit in with normal maintenance needs; That priority will be given to those sites where treatment would benefit the greatest number of people; That the works will be carried out in such a way as to minimise disruption to the general public and users of the network; That priority will be given to roads, opened since June 1988, where actual noise levels have turned out to be significantly higher than predicted at the time of the Public Inquiry. The Government's proposals for reducing the effects of traffic noise were first set out in Hansard (Column 682 in November 1999). A list of the schemes at these sites that have been completed or are under construction is in Table A attached. The provision of low noise surfacing has an impact on the treatment necessary at these sites. We are still carrying out studies listed in Hansard and until they are completed, I cannot give an indication of the cost or timing of any work identified at the remaining sites. The annual ring fenced budget for noise mitigation measures is £5M and there are currently no plans to review it. Regarding the condition of the M27 and M3, the Agency carries out several different road surveys to determine the condition and residual pavement life of the trunk road network. Measurements are undertaken annually of the road surface condition, including rutting, texture depth and profile. A visual assessment is undertaken every5 years, together with a deflectograph survey that determines residual pavement life. A skid resistance survey is completed every 3 years. The forward programme of maintenance is identified from a study of the results of all these assessments. Analysis of the results of the latest road condition surveys of the M3 between junction 7 and 8 indicates that, subject to further testing, the section near Winchester may be due for major maintenance, which would include the use of a low noise surface, in about 2004–05. The condition of the M27 between Southampton and Winchester currently indicates that maintenance would not be required within the next 5 years.

Table A
Scheme name/description Quieter surfacing QS Noise barrier B Completed C under construction U Construction costs (£)
A52 Spondon B C 834,000
A1 Tuxford QS C 1
A52 Clifton QS C 436,000
A27 Portsbridge Noise Barrier B C 125,000
A34 Boltey Noise Mitigation B C 470,000
A404 (M) Maidenhead Noise Mitigation B C 1,335,000
M25 Clackett Lane to Jet 5 QS C 1
M60 J12–13 Worsley B U 4,000
M6 J8–9 (Phases 1 to 3) B U 689,000
M1 J25 B U 2,116,000
M3 6–7 Basingstoke Accoustic Barrier Ph 1 B U 410,000
M3 J4–4a Farnborough B U 1,275,000
M4 J7 8/9 Holyport/Bray Noise Mitigation B U 300,000
M4 J5–6 Datchet Brands Hill Noise Mitigation B U 469,000
A34 Hinksey Noise Mitigation B U 503,000
1major Maintenance schemes providing quieter surfacing