§ Lord Bradshawasked Her Majesty's Government:
What is the length of time taken, in typical cases, for minor modifications to camera equipment used in traffic enforcement to receive type approval. [HL2813]
§ The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Home Office (Lord Bassam of Brighton)Modifications to type approved camera equipment are assessed on a case-by-case basis bearing in mind the technical and legal implications of the modification. To quote an average period taken would be misleading, even if the information were available. A minor change to the name of the device would require a new type approval order to be drawn up and signed. Modifications such as software changes could require considerable testing by the Police Scientific Development Branch of the Home Office before type approval could be recommended. Other modifications that do not have any direct bearing on the working of the device may be approved simply by a letter to the manufacturer.
§ Lord Bradshawasked Her Majesty's Government:
How many applications for type approval for camera equipment used in traffic enforcement are awaiting clearance; and how many of these have been waiting for more than three months. [HL2814]
24WA
§ Lord Bassam of BrightonHer Majesty's Government currently hold five applications for type approval of camera equipment, four of which were received more than three months ago. The Police and Scientific Development Branch (PSDB) of the Home Office is responsible for testing and evaluating new speed camera devices. PSDB ensures that all testing is completed as quickly as is practicable so that the police have the best equipment available. But proper and rigorous testing is essential, and applicants can take time to supply the relevant documentation and meet the necessary testing standards.