Hospital Waiting Lists (Hansard, 17 July 2000)

§ Mrs. Virginia Bottomley
To ask the Secretary of State for Health which health authorities have more in-patients waiting over one year than in May 1997. [128503]

§ Mr. Denham
The list compares March 1997 (the last data collection before May 1997) with March 2000.
Health authorities who have seen an increase in patients waiting over 12 months for elective admission March 1997 to March 2000
Northern and Yorkshire

Bradford HA

Durham HA

East Riding HA

Leeds HA

Newcastle and North Tyneside HA

North Cumbria HA

Northumberland HA

Sunderland HA

Tees HA

Wakefield HA

North Yorkshire HA

Calderdale and Kirklees HA

Trent

Leicestershire HA

North Nottinghamshire HA

west Midlands

Birmingham HA

Coventry HA

Dudley HA

Herefordshire HA

Sandwell HA

Shropshire HA

Solihull HA

North Staffordshire HA
70W
South Staffordshire HA

Walsall HA

Warwickshire HA

Wolverhampton HA

Worcestershire HA

North West

South Lancashire HA

Liverpool HA

Manchester HA

Morecambe Bay HA

St. Helens and Knowsley HA

Salford and Trafford HA

Sefton HA

Stockport HA

West Pennine HA

Bury and Rochdale HA

North Cheshire HA

South Cheshire HA

East Lancashire HA

North West Lancashire HA

Wigan and Bolton HA

Wirral HA

Eastern

Bedfordshire HA

North Essex HA

South Essex HA

Suffolk HA

East and North Hertfordshire HA

West Hertfordshire HA

Cambridgeshire HA

Norfolk HA

London

Kensington, Chelsea and Westminster HA

Bexley and Greenwich HA

Bromley HA

Kingston and Richmond HA

Merton, Sutton and Wandsworth HA

Barking and Havering HA

Camden and Islington HA

East London and City HA

South East

Berkshire

Buckinghamshire

East Kent

West Kent

East Surrey

West Surrey

East Sussex, Brighton and Hove

West Sussex

Northamptonshire
71W
North and Mid Hampshire

Portsmouth and South East Hampshire

South West RO

Somerset HA

South and West Devon HA

Wiltshire HA

Avon HA

Cornwall and Isles of Scilly HA

Dorset HA

North and East Devon HA

Gloucestershire HA

Source:
Department of Health form QF01

Name Date of commencement (financial close) Value (£ million) Have they been refinanced? Is there a re-financing clawback?

Dartford and Gravesham July 1997 94 No ¹No

Carlisle November 1997 65 No ²No

South Buckinghamshire December 1997 45 No No

Norfolk and Norwich January 1998 144 No ¹No

North Durham March 1998 61 No Yes

Greenwich July 1998 93 No ²No

Calderdale July 1998 65 No Yes

South Manchester December 1998 66 No Yes

Bromley November 1998 118 No ¹No

Barnet and Chase February 1999 54 No No

Worcester March 1999 87 No Yes

Hereford April 1999 64 No Yes

South Durham May 1999 41 No ¹No

South Tees August 1998 122 No ²No

Swindon and Marlborough October 1999 96 No Yes

King's December 1999 64 No Yes

Leeds Community March 2000 47 No Yes

St. George's March 2000 49 No Yes

¹ There are no specific clawback arrangements, but the contract places a limit on the private sector's ability to refinance without the trust's approval.

² These are transactions financed by bond issues. The nature of these transactions means re-financing is extremely unlikely.

§ Mr. Matthew Taylor
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what clawback mechanisms exist under private finance initiative contracts within his Department in respect of(a) refinancing and (b) other contingencies; and if he will place copies of each private finance initiative contract in the Library. [130211]

§ Mr. Denham
[holding answer 13 July 2000]: I refer the hon. Member to my reply above to my right hon. Friend the Member for Swansea, West (Mr. Williams). This details the major National Health Service private finance initiative contracts with clawback arrangements regarding re-financing.
No other specific clawback arrangements are made except in the case of schemes with forward land sales. Where the land is sold in advance, there are clawback arrangements in the event of the land eventually beings

£

Costs

NHS Trust Legal Financial Other Total As percentage of capital cost¹

Bromley 1,710,000 1,759,000 743,000 4,212,000 3.5

Norfolk and Norwich 1,559,000 1,938,000 932,000 4,429,000 3.0

Hereford 2,500,000 1,200,000 900,000 4,600,000 7.2

Greenwich 1,169,000 676,000 351,000 2,196,000 2.4

South Manchester 1,224,000 888,000 1,051,000 3,163,000 4.8

Name	Date of commencement (financial close)	Value (£ million)	Have they been refinanced?	Is there a re-financing clawback?
Dartford and Gravesham	July 1997	94	No	¹No
Carlisle	November 1997	65	No	²No
South Buckinghamshire	December 1997	45	No	No
Norfolk and Norwich	January 1998	144	No	¹No
North Durham	March 1998	61	No	Yes
Greenwich	July 1998	93	No	²No
Calderdale	July 1998	65	No	Yes
South Manchester	December 1998	66	No	Yes
Bromley	November 1998	118	No	¹No
Barnet and Chase	February 1999	54	No	No
Worcester	March 1999	87	No	Yes
Hereford	April 1999	64	No	Yes
South Durham	May 1999	41	No	¹No
South Tees	August 1998	122	No	²No
Swindon and Marlborough	October 1999	96	No	Yes
King's	December 1999	64	No	Yes
Leeds Community	March 2000	47	No	Yes
St. George's	March 2000	49	No	Yes
¹ There are no specific clawback arrangements, but the contract places a limit on the private sector's ability to refinance without the trust's approval.
² These are transactions financed by bond issues. The nature of these transactions means re-financing is extremely unlikely.

£
	Costs
NHS Trust	Legal	Financial	Other	Total	As percentage of capital cost¹
Bromley	1,710,000	1,759,000	743,000	4,212,000	3.5
Norfolk and Norwich	1,559,000	1,938,000	932,000	4,429,000	3.0
Hereford	2,500,000	1,200,000	900,000	4,600,000	7.2
Greenwich	1,169,000	676,000	351,000	2,196,000	2.4
South Manchester	1,224,000	888,000	1,051,000	3,163,000	4.8