HC Deb 02 July 1999 vol 334 cc310-2W
Mr. Sutcliffe

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department which authorities have received contributions of over 50 per cent. towards ethnic minority support under section 11 since 1995. [89438]

Mr. Mike O'Brien

Information is not readily available in the form requested. From 1 April 1995 until (except where shown) 31 March 1999, one or more projects run by the authorities shown in the table had a maximum section 11 grant allocation that was more than 50 per cent. of the minimum level of expenditure that needed to be incurred in order to attract that allocation. But, in many cases, actual expenditure exceeded the minimum level of expenditure, thus reducing the proportion of the total cost that was met by section 11 grant.

Authority

  • Barnet
  • Bedfordshire1
  • Berkshire2
  • Bexley
  • Birmingham
  • Bolton
  • Brent
  • Buckinghamshire
  • Bury
  • Calderdale
  • Cambridgeshire
  • Cheshire3
  • Cleveland4
  • Coventry
  • Croydon
  • Derbyshire5
  • Devon
  • Doncaster
  • Durham6
  • Enfield
  • Gloucester
  • Gwent7
  • Hackney
  • Hampshire8
  • Haringey
  • Harrow
  • Havering
  • Hertfordshire
  • Hillingdon
  • Hounslow
  • Humberside9
  • Islington
  • Kensington & Chelsea
  • Kent10
  • Kingston-upon-Thames
  • Lancashire11
  • Leeds
  • Leicestershire12
  • Lincolnshire
  • Liverpool
  • Manchester
  • Merton
  • Newcastle13
  • Newham14
  • Northamptonshire
  • North Tyneside
  • North Yorkshire
  • Nottinghamshire15
  • Oldham
  • Oxfordshire
  • Redbridge
  • Richmond
  • Rochdale
  • Sandwell16
  • Sheffield
  • South Glamorgan17
  • Staffordshire
  • Stockport
  • Suffolk
  • Sunderland
  • Surrey
  • Tameside
  • Tower Hamlets
  • Trafford
  • Walsall
  • Waltham Forest
  • Wandsworth
  • Warwickshire
  • Westminster
  • West Sussex
  • Wiltshire18
  • 1 Also Luton, to whom two projects were transferred following local government reorganisation.
  • 2 Following local government reorganisation, funding paid instead to Reading, Slough, Windsor and Maidenhead and Wokingham.
  • 3 Following local government reorganisation, funding paid instead to Warrington.
  • 4 Following local government reorganisation, funding paid instead to Middlesbrough, and later to Hartlepool, Redcar and Cleveland, and Stockton as well.
  • 5 Projects transferred to the City of Derby following local government reorganisation.
  • 6 Project transferred to Darlington following local government reorganisation.
  • 7 Authority abolished following local government reorganisation; projects transferred to Newport.
  • 8 Two projects transferred to Portsmouth and Southampton following local government reorganisation; other project remained with the county.
  • 9 Authority abolished following local government reorganisation; project divided between Kingston-upon-Hull, North Lincolnshire and North East Lincolnshire.
  • 10 Basis of funding revised to 50/50 after authority obtained increased financial provision in 1997.
  • 11 Also Blackburn following local government reorganisation.
  • 12 Also the City of Leciester following local government reorganisation.
  • 13 Funding for project at over 50 per cent. finished in March 1997.
  • 14 Funding for project finished in March 1997.
  • 15 Project divided with the City of Nottingham following local government reorganisation.
  • l6 Funding at over 50 per cent. finished in March 1997.
  • 17 Authority abolished following local government reorganisation; project transferred to Cardiff.
  • 18 Project transferred to Swindon following local government reorganisation.