§ Mr. TimmsTo ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement on the progress being made by firms in resolving their reviews of personal pensions. [51262]
274W
Progress by pensions firms in resolving cases of personal pensions mis-selling in the period to the end of June 1998 A B C D E F G H Under 50% of cases resolved DBS 1,965 400 392 101 291 165 8 34 Financial options 399 146 48 22 26 24 6 48 Burns Anderson 1,210 335 327 150 132 99 8 48 50–75% of cases resolved Gan 11,915 1,610 6,242 661 5,581 4,305 36 55 Countrywide 4,879 2,501 281 172 109 85 2 57 Abbey Life 17,544 4,768 6,904 1,096 5,808 5,158 29 63 Lincoln National 13,342 1,934 7,789 1,174 6,615 5,302 40 63 Windsor Life 9,582 3,505 3,060 299 2,761 2,258 24 63 London and Manchester 8,466 1,356 4,862 558 4,304 3,859 46 68 Hill Samuel 6,150 867 3,845 661 3,184 2,855 46 71 Colonial 8,495 2,724 4,094 474 3,620 2,918 34 72 Friends Provident 6,994 1,104 4,419 660 3,759 3,307 47 73 Canada Life 5,593 376 4,270 605 3,665 3,119 56 73 Nat West 15,208 4,647 7,631 1,108 6,523 5,479 36 74 Berkeley Independent 181 111 23 19 4 4 2 74 Standard Life 7,130 825 4,892 1,106 3,786 3,349 47 74
§ Mrs. LiddellOn 17 June 1998,Official Report, columns 208–10, I published figures showing the progress being made in the period ending 31 May by the 41 firms I have been monitoring for the last year. The table shows the progress made in the period up to the end of June by 29 of the 41 firms. Most of these firms have continued to make good progress, and only 3 firms have resolved under 50 per cent. of their cases. These are networks of independent financial advisers, and were among the firms I met on 7 July.
When I met senior representatives of the 41 firms last summer, I challenged them to meet or to better the targets set for them by the regulators, and made clear to them that I would publish progress statistics collected from them monthly. In my oral statement to the House on 18 November 1997, Official Report, columns 155–63, I said that I would remove from this list the name of any firm once it had achieved its target for resolving priority cases.
The Personal Investment Authority (PIA) have informed me that information provided to them indicates that, consistent with the deadlines they were set, 12 firms appear to have made every proper effort to obtain investors' acceptance of offers of redress. The names of these 12 firms have therefore been removed from the list. The firms are AXA Equity & Law, Barclays Life, Britannic Assurance, Commercial Union, Godwins, Guardian, Lloyds TSB, Midland Bank, Norwich Union, Prudential, Royal and Sun Alliance and United Assurance.
I should emphasise, however, that this does not mean that their work is over. The regulators will continue to monitor firms to see that they follow through on offers of redress in a timely manner and establish the arrangements necessary to honour guarantees of pensions rights. Looking to the future, firms must also tackle the next phase of the review of personal pensions, which in general terms concerns the cases of people whose need for redress is less urgent. This second phase of the review was the subject of a consultation by the regulators ending in May this year, and they will shortly be announcing the way forward. I hope all firms will respond constructively.
275W
Progress by pensions firms in resolving cases of personal pensions mis-selling in the period to the end of june 1998 A B C D E F G H Over 75% of cases resolved CIS 43,679 5,346 31,446 13,395 18,051 14,249 33 76 IFA Network 365 122 161 107 54 48 13 76 Sedgwick 16,597 8,673 4,348 1,665 2,683 2,417 15 77 Sun Life of Canada 28,038 11,730 12,386 2,380 10,006 8,508 30 81 Albany Life 2,970 666 2,107 195 1,912 1,537 52 81 Equitable Life 7,584 1,895 4,657 1,691 2,966 2,687 35 83 Allied Dunbar 19,385 4,133 13,413 3,687 9,726 8,246 43 83 M&E Network 319 175 108 28 77 65 20 84 Hogg Robinson 2,226 810 1,191 401 790 675 30 85 Legal & General 36,738 15,093 19,363 1,812 17,551 14,668 40 86 Pearl 47,125 3,956 39,500 5,633 33,867 31,548 67 87 Wesleyan 4,185 293 3,535 1,001 2,534 2,368 57 88 Royal London 12,971 1,140 11,694 1,521 10,173 9,569 74 94 A: cases identified as requiring review
B: of A, cases where investor was informed that information gained during assessment excluded cases from review
C: number of assessments completed
D: cases where the investor has been informed that no redress is due
E: cases where redress has been offered
F: cases where redress has been accepted
G: cases where redress has been accepted as a percentage of cases identified for review ((F/A)x100)
H: cases resolved, including exclusions, as a percentage of cases identified for review (((B+D+F)/A)x100)