HC Deb 08 April 1998 vol 310 cc247-9W
Mr. Timms

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what further progress has been made towards resolving cases of personal pensions mis-selling. [38751]

Mrs. Liddell

Today, I have placed in the Library a table showing what progress has been made by the 41 firms the Government have been monitoring in the period up to 31 March 1998. The table shows that,

Progress by pension firms in completing reviews of personal pensions mis-selling in the period to the end of March 1998
A B C D E F G H
Under 25 per cent. of cases resolved:
DBS 3,392 128 222 68 154 105 3 9
25–50 per cent of cases resolved:
Gan 11,369 867 4,417 556 3,861 2,927 26 38
Financial Options 353 108 36 19 17 14 4 40
Lincoln National 13,326 1,483 5,556 1,042 4,514 2,881 22 41
Burns Anderson 1,080 276 178 102 76 61 6 41
Countrywide 4,759 1,875 262 165 97 77 2 44
Windsor Life 9,475 2,837 1,958 276 1,682 1,402 15 48
50–75 per cent. of cases resolved:
Standard Life 6,947 677 3,305 919 2,386 2,110 30 53
Abbey Life 17,354 4,251 6,200 912 5,288 4,183 24 54
Friends Provident 6,876 979 3,259 493 2,766 2,428 35 57
CIS 43,039 3,640 25,973 12,897 3,076 8,448 20 58
Canada Life 5,528 307 3,447 549 2,901 2,354 43 58
Colonial 8,242 2,238 3,205 360 2,845 2,219 27 58
London and Manchester 8,255 1,154 4,073 511 3,562 3,175 38 59
Royal & Sun Alliance 15,753 2,350 7,980 941 7,039 6,020 38 59
IFA Network 267 54 107 76 31 29 11 60
Hill Samuel 6,026 791 3,234 623 2,611 2,191 36 60
Sun Life of Canada 26,969 7,594 10,330 1,988 8,342 6,886 26 61
National Westminster 14,637 4,162 6,277 1,040 5,237 4,076 28 63
Allied Dunbar 18,867 3,358 10,735 3,149 7,586 6,066 32 67
Albany Life 2,931 587 1,799 161 1,638 1,253 43 68
United Assurance 12,962 1,061 9,993 1,927 8,066 5,891 45 69
Britannic 19,120 4,740 10,423 2,638 7,785 5,809 30 69
Equitable Life 7,384 1,693 3,761 1,460 2,301 2,024 27 70
Sedgwick 15,669 7,818 3,719 1,459 2,260 1,996 13 72
Berkeley Independent 143 87 18 14 4 3 2 73
Guardian 8,976 1,160 6,081 932 5,149 4,547 51 74
Over 75 per cent of cases resolved:
Legal & General 36,726 14,568 16,131 1,590 14,541 11,390 31 75
M&E Network 302 167 65 24 41 37 12 75
Lloyd's TSB 49,062 10,840 28,883 6,093 22,790 20,371 42 76
Commercial Union 7,747 1,246 5,137 767 4,370 3,969 51 77
Godwins 1,478 109 1,229 441 788 611 41 79
Royal London 12,355 1,112 9,590 1,404 8,186 7,281 59 79

in line with the trend established in recent months, firms have continued to make progress, with some 69 per cent. of their priority cases now completed.

The Government continue to look to firms for their ongoing commitment to deliver the priority targets. I hope they will also work constructively with the regulators on the second phase of the review, building on the consultation launched by the Financial Services Authority and the Personal Investment Authority last month. The Association of British Insurers (ABI) has set the right tone at the start of the process, and I hope that its pragmatic approach to the issues raised by phase 2 of the review will continue over the months ahead.

I have raised in this house on a number of occasions my concern that all pension firms, not just the large firms I am monitoring, must get on with the personal pensions review. Ultimately, responsibility for conducting the reviews rests with the firm concerned—be it a large company or a small IFA. However experience does show that cooperation and collaboration between firms can lead to progress in finding solutions to technical problems which are widely encountered. Recently, ABI announced an initiative to assist and to encourage IFAs to carry out their reviews. These proposals give welcome recognition to the fact that each and every firm's good name is dependent on the reputation of the industry as a whole, and I hope that early implementation of the proposals is achieved.

Progress by pension firms in completing reviews of personal pensions mis-selling in the period to the end of March 1998
A B C D E F G H
Wesleyan 4,173 255 3,285 956 2,329 2,103 50 79
Pearl 46,213 3,430 38,760 5,572 33,188 29,987 63 82
Norwich Union 7,389 2,233 4,619 728 3,891 3,261 44 84
Prudential 72,010 19,432 52,563 3,866 48,697 37,519 52 84
Barclays 16,981 6,197 9,411 2,169 7,242 6,265 37 86
Hogg Robinson 2,084 821 1,102 386 716 593 28 86
AXA Equity and Law 3,943 774 2,817 600 2,217 2,070 52 87
Midland 4,840 498 4,243 631 3,612 3,334 69 92

A: Cases identified as requiring review.

B: Of A, cases where investor was informed that information gained during assessment excluded cases from review.

C: Number of assessments completed.

D: Cases where the investor has been informed that no redress is due.

E: Cases where redress has been offered.

F: Cases where redress has been accepted.

G: Cases where redress has been accepted as a percentage of cases identified for review ((F/A)x 100).

H: Cases completed, including exclusions, as a percentage of cases identified for review (((B+D+F)/Ax100).

Back to