HC Deb 08 July 1997 vol 297 cc410-1W
Dr. George Turner

To ask the Minister of Agriculture Fisheries and Food what progress his Department has made in meeting the service delivery targets set out in "Commitment to Service". [7544]

Dr. John Cunningham

The following table sets out the performance achieved by Regional Service Centres against the targets set in "Commitment to Service", second edition.

RCS performance data percentage for financial year 1996–97 (unless otherwise specified)
Total
Arable Area Payments Scheme
Main payments 99
Oilseeds
Advanced payments 99
Final payments 99
Beef Special Premium Scheme
Advance payments (1996) 98
Balance payments (1995) 99
CID applications issued (1996) 99
Premium paid CIDs issued (1996) 99
Suckler Cow Premium Scheme
Balance payments 1995 99
Advance payments 1996 99
Hill Livestock Compensatory Allowances
Claims 1996 97
Sheep Annual Premium Scheme
Claims marketing year 19961 97
Agricultural Improvement Scheme
Plan claims 100
Environmentally Sensitive Areas
Applications 97
Claims 99
Environmentally Sensitive Areas Conservation Plan
Applications 97
Claims 98
Farm and Conservation Grant Scheme 1989
Plan claims 99
Non plan claims2 58
Farm and Conservation Grant Scheme 1991
Plan claims 97

RCS performance data percentage for financial year 1996–97 (unless otherwise specified)
Total
Farm Woodland Premium Scheme
Applications 94
Claims (1996) 99
Injurious Weeds
Complaints 99
Pilot Nitrate Sensitive Areas Scheme
Claims (1996) 100
New Nitrate Sensitive Areas Scheme
Applications (1996) 93
Claims 98
Protection of Badgers Act 1992
Licence applications 99
Five Year Set Aside Scheme
Claims 100
Strychnine Permits
Applications 97
Agricultural Wage Inspections
Complaints 91
Wildlife and Countryside Act
Licence applications 98
Correspondence
Answered within 10 working days 97
Complaints
Numbers receiving response within 10 working days 88

Notes:

1 Final payments made by 30 April 1097.

2 The relatively high failure rate for F and CGS 1989 non-plan claims is due to a large number of claims being received in the month before the scheme closed, making it impossible to meet the Charter target in many cases.

1. The total percentage has been calculated by setting the entire number of applications or claims cleared within the target time, against the total number received. Applications and claims not cleared due to reasons beyond our control (incorrect information supplied by applicant, etc.) are not included as failures to meet target.

2. The Farm and Conservation Grant Scheme (1991) Plan applications, the Farm Diversification Grant Scheme (Capital Items) Claims, and the Farm Diversification Grant Scheme (Feasibility and Marketing) Claims have all been omitted from the table, as the numbers involved are de-minimis.

3. Three complaints were referred to the MAFF Adjudicator during the year. Two of these complaints were resolved, the other was referred to the Minister. One complaint from a previous year has been referred to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration and is currently under investigation.