§ Dr. GodmanTo ask the Secretary of State for Social Security when the hon. Member for Greenock and Port Glasgow can expect an answer to his letter of 18 June to the Parliamentary Under-Secretary about the Housing Benefit (General) Amendment Regulations 1996, S.I. 1996, No. 965. [39000]
§ Mr. Roger EvansI replied to the hon. Member on Monday 22 July 1996.
§ Mr. BayleyTo ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how much housing benefit was paid to residents of(a) York and (b) North Yorkshire in each year since 1979–80. [38939]
§ Mr. EvansThe available information is set out in the table:
294W
£ millions Year York North Yorkshire 1983–84 3.8 18.4 1984–85 4.4 20.9 1985–86 5.3 23.7 1986–87 5.6 25.6 1987–88 5.6 25.8 1988–89 5.7 26.2 1989–90 7.2 29.5 1990–91 9.2 32.8 1991–92 10.1 38.8 1992–93 14.1 56.4
£ millions Year York North Yorkshire 1993–94 16.8 67.3 1994–95 19.5 78.5 Source:
DSS Finance and Planning Division and Department of the Environment.
Notes:
1. Figures have been rounded to the nearest hundred thousand.
2. Information is only available from the introduction of the national scheme in 1983–84.
§ Mr. BayleyTo ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what percentage of families with children aged under 18 years received housing benefit in(a) York, (b) North Yorkshire, (c) Yorkshire and Humberside and (d) England in each year since 1979. [38941]
§ Mr. EvansThe available information is set out in the table:
Percentages of families with children aged under 18, who are in receipt of Housing Benefit for England Year Percentage 1990 13 1991 14 1992 17 1993 19 1994 19 1995 20 Source:
1. Housing Benefit Management Information System, annual 1 per cent. sample enquiry taken at May of each year given.
2. Child Benefit 1 per cent. sample enquiry at December 1994 and 4 per cent. sample enquiry at December for 1993, 1992, 1991, 1990 and 1989. Includes families with children aged only 18 and 19.
Note:
Information is not available for York, North Yorkshire and Yorkshire and Humberside and the relevant national data were not collected prior to 1990.
Mr. HowarthTo ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what is his estimate in each case of(a) the cost of and (b) the numbers gaining from a reduction in the housing benefit taper to 50 per cent. to people in receipt of (i) the carer premium, (ii) the lone parent premium and (iii) the disability premium. [39045]
§ Mr. EvansThe information is set out in the table.
The table shows, for each of the three groups, the estimated annual cost, the estimated number of current claimants who will gain from the change—gainers—and the estimated number of cases who will become newly entitled to and claim housing benefit as a result of the change—floaters on.
Group Cost (£ million) Gainers (thousands) Caseloads Floaters on (thousands) Disability premium 70 245 15 Lone parent premium 55 110 25 Carer premium 0 5 0 Total 125 355 40 1. Estimates are based on the Family Expenditure Surveys of 1991, 1992 and 1993, uprated to 1996/97 prices and benefit levels. Expenditure estimates are rounded to the nearest £5 million, and caseloads to the nearest 5,000.
2. The cost and caseload estimates for the disability premium and the lone parent premium includes some cases who are also in receipt of the Carer Premium.
295W