HC Deb 06 February 1996 vol 271 cc173-6W
Mr. Pike

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how much money was lent on social fund loans at the last date for which figures are available; how many people have such loans; what is the average loan at the time of issue; and what is the average repayment period. [12834]

Mr. Roger Evans

The information for the period April to December 1995 is set out in the table.

Budgeting loan Crisis loan
Number of awards 702,751 621,048
Total amount awarded £190,294,974 £41,161,827
Average payment £270.78 £66.27
Average length of repayment for loan repaid during this period 34.7 weeks 14.6 weeks

1. The number of discretionary awards made after review is not included.

2. The repayment terms for social fund loans are designed to be affordable to the applicant. The rate of repayment depends upon the applicant's individual circumstances. Although most loans are repaid within 78 weeks, the period of repayment may be extended up to 104 weeks.

Mr. Corbyn

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what has been the average time taken to process a claim on the social fund for each year since its inception; and if he will indicate the total number of claims(a) met, (b) refused and (c) appealed against. [12265]

Mr. Evans

[holding answer 31 January 1996]: The information is set out in the tables.

Clearance times
Year Maternity payments Funeral payments Community Care grants Budgeting loans Crisis loans
1988–89 n/a n/a 7 working days 13 working days 1 working day
1989–90 n/a n/a 8 working days 10 working days 1 working day
1990–91 n/a n/a 7 working days 4.9 working days 1 working day
1991–92 n/a n/a 5.9 working days 3.2 working days 1 working day
1992–93 n/a n/a 4.3 working days 5.9 working days 1 working day
1993–94 80.88 per cent. in 5 working days 98.02 per cent. in 20 working days 71.69 per cent. in 12 working days 96.09 per cent. in 35 working days 81 per cent. in 7 working days 98 per cent. in 20 working days 78 per cent. in 6 working days 97 per cent. in 20 working days Cleared in day need arises
1994–95 73.3 per cent. in 5 working days 93.83 per cent. in 20 working days 75.72 per cent. in 12 working days 96.95 per cent. in 35 working days 87 per cent. in 7 working days 98 per cent. in 20 working days 84 per cent. in 6 working days 98 per cent. in 20 working days Cleared in day need arises

Performance monitoring by the Benefits Agency of clearance times for funeral payments and maternity payments did not commence until September 1992.

Social fund claims, awards, refusals, appeals and reviews
Maternity payments Funeral payments Community care grants Budgeting loans Crisis loans
1988–89
Claims (000s) 212 53 315 933 501
Awards (000s) 170 40 153 505 379
Refusals (000s) 49 13 146 330 45
Appeals 748 668
Applications for first review 25,382 71,131 9,824
1989–90
Claims (000s) 224 63 523 1,131 645
Awards (000s) 174 44 230 580 449
Refusals (000s) 46 15 278 455 46
Appeals 638 859
Applications for first review 71,104 100,200 9,898
1990–91
Claims (000s) 234 68 692 1,092 596
Awards (000s) 189 49 246 596 504
Refusals (000s) 41 15 370 472 53
Appeals 522 579
Applications for first review 55,932 64,577 5,243
1991–92
Claims (000s) 262 77 1,027 1,360 711
Awards (000s) 217 57 255 711 592
Refusals (000s) 41 17 736 545 70
Appeals 564 1,076
Applications for first review 88,913 90,429 7,148
1992–93
Claims (000s) 271 83 1,184 1,498 837
Awards (000s) 228 63 287 801 671
Refusals (000s) 38 16 865 592 118
Appeals 491 1,032
Applications for first review 119,351 118,539 13,588
1993–94
Claims (000s) 272 94 1,244 1,529 901
Awards (000s) 230 72 294 854 699
Refusals (000s) 20 10 923 600 153
Appeals 357 969
Applications for first review 148,633 153,776 18,790
1994–95
Claims (000s) 262 95 1,266 1,467 1,011
Awards (000s) 220 68 285 864 755
Refusals (000s) 42 27 964 588 213
Appeals 312 1,287
Applications for first review 191,539 205,368 27,760

1. As claims for maternity and funeral payments are from the regulated part of the social fund there are rights of appeal to a social security appeal tribunal. The grievance procedure for dissatisfied applicants to the discretionary social fund is by review process.

2. The difference between applications received, awards and refusals is due to: applications being withdrawn by applicants; applications where there is no response from applicants; and applications not decided at the time the count was made.