§ Mr. PikeTo ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list the section 11(a) successful and (b) unsuccessful bids showing in the case of the approved figure as a percentage of the bid in each case.
§ Mr. Nicholas Baker[holding answer 28 February 1995]: I refer the hon. Member to the reply that I gave him on 22 February 1995 Official Report, columns 228-32, in which I set out the level of grant sought by each applicant under the recent section 11 bidding round, and to the reply which my right hon. and learned Friend gave to the hon. Member for Edmonton (Dr. Twinn) on 28 February 1995, Official Report, columns 541-45, in which he listed the grant budget allocation for 1995-96 for each successful applicant. Table (a) shows, in respect of each successful applicant, the level of budget allocation for 1995-96 expressed as a percentage of grant sought for that year, all on the basis of November 1994 prices which applicants were asked to use in preparing their bids, and subject in some instances to arithmetical adjustments to correct an applicant's original calculations. Table (b) lists those applicants whose bids were unsuccessful.
113W
(a) Successful applicants Local authorities etc Grant awarded as percentage of grant sought Avon 96.1 Barking and Dagenham 96.2 Barnet 74.4 Berkshire 51.3 Bexley 40.0 Birmingham 8.9 Bolton 34.8 Bradford 96.0 Brent 19.9 Bromley 63.5 114W
(a) Successful applicants Local authorities etc Grant awarded as percentage of grant sought Buckinghamshire 76.8 Cambridgeshire 13.5 Camden 94.4 Cardiff 33.3 Cleveland 51.4 Coventry 51.6 Croydon 100.0 Derbyshire 39.8 Devon 42.8 Dorset 50.0 Dudley 94.7 Ealing 93.7 East Sussex 74.6 Enfield 74.6 Essex 21.1 Gateshead 94.5 Gloucestershire 80.7 Greenwich 80.2 Gwent 100.0 Hackney 27.4 Hammersmith and Fulham 91.0 Haringey 79.4 Harrow 100.0 Havering 100.0 Hereford and Worcester 100.0 Hertfordshire 100.0 Hillingdon 59.0 Hounslow 66.5 Humberside 13.3 Hyndburn 27.9 Islington 83.6 Kent 100.0 Kirklees 87.9 Lambeth 96.2 Lancashire 47.2 Leeds 13.3 Leicester 57.6 Leicestershire 70.0 Lewisham 69.3 Lincolnshire 100.0 Liverpool 77.1 London Boroughs Grants Committee 100.0 Manchester 100.0 Merton 91.5 Middlesbrough 12.2 Milton Keynes 46.3 Newham 48.2 Norfolk 55.4 Northamptonshire 38.7 Nottingham 70.6 Nottinghamshire 57.9 Oldham 43.6 Oxford 66.6 Peterborough 50.0 Redbridge 67.0 Redditch 100.0 Rochdale 27.8 Rotherham 80.6 Salford 75.8 Sheffield 23.4 Shropshire 71.3 Somerset 83.3 South Tyneside 58.3 South Yorkshire FCDA 100.0 Southampton 18.3 Southwark 74.8 St. Albans 100.0 St. Helens 75.8 Staffordshire 59.1 Suffolk 27.4
115W
(a) Successful applicants Local authorities etc Grant awarded as percentage of grant sought Sutton 56.2 Tameside 7.1 Tower Hamlets 10.0 Wakefield 90.2 Walsall 81.1 Waltham Forest 7.9 Warwickshire 87.3 West Glamorgan 100.0 West Midlands FCDA 100.0 West Yorkshire FCDA 100.0 Westminster 65.4 Wigan 71.3 Wolverhampton 88.6 Grant-maintained schools and city technology colleges Ash Green 73.7 Beechview Middle 50.0 Bishop Challoner RC 100.0 Brentside High 60.6 Brushwood Middle 100.0 Castle Hall 83.3 Castlefield 71.3 Claremont 100.0 Copland Community 100.0 Deacon's 83.3 Desborough 50.0 Djanogly CTC 85.7 Dormers Wells Infants 62.9 Dormers Wells Junior 100.0 Drayton Manor 100.0 Dunraven 63.8 Francis Bacon 100.0 Graveney 82.7 Greenford High 73.9 Greenwood Dale 100.0 Hall Green 100.0 Hamilton Combined 100.0 Hendon 75.8 Holly Hall 66.7 Holy Trinty 83.9 John Kelly Girls 100.0 London Oratory 76.7 Myton 100.0 Northampton Boys 90.9 Northolt High 87.5 Prospect 79.3 Queens Park 94.3 Radcliffe 50.0 Reading Girls 76.9 Sacred Heart RC 100.0 Small Heath 98.9 St. Andrews RC 50.0 St. Marks West Essex 100.0 Stantonbury Campus 100.0 Stopsley High 100.0 Stratford 99.9 Surrey Square 100.0 Wood End Infant 100.0 Wood End Junior 66.7 Wrenn 75.8 Colleges of further education Arnold and Carlton 78.6 Bexley 100.0 Birmingham Consortium 54.2 Cambridge Regional 100.0 Charles Keene 62.4 City and Islington 58.4 Clarendon 54.5
(a) Successful applicants Local authorities etc Grant awarded as percentage of grant sought Coventry Technical 37.5 Crawley 100.0 Croydon 100.0 Ealing Tertiary 32.5 Enfield 100.0 Greenhill 43.9 Hackney Community 80.1 Hendon 100.0 Huddersfield Technical 34.0 Kingsway 28.8 Language and Literacy Unit Southwark 49.5 Newham 35.4 Oaklands 44.3 Park Lane 63.1 Sheffield 47.2 South Nottingham 82.4 Southgate 67.5 St. Francis Xavier 50.0 Tameside 100.0 Thomas Danby 15.3 Tile Hill 100.0 Tower Hamlets 38.3 Uxbridge 22.7 West Herts 65.8
116W
(b) Unsuccessful applicants Local Authority Bedfordshire Preston Burnley Reading Bury Richmond Calderdale Sandwell Clwyd Scunthrope Crew and Nantwich Sefton Doncaster South Glamorgan Gloucester Sunderland Hampshire Surrey Kensington and Chelsea Trafford Kingston Wansworth Luton West Sussex Newcastle Wiltshire North Tyneside Wirral Oxfordshire Working Portsmouth Grant-maintained schools, City Technology Colleges Alperton Common Kingsbury High Anglo European Merrill Community Avon Valley Montagu Beechen Cliff Notre Dame Billericay Oldfield Blessed Edward Oldcorne RC Raines Foundation Broomhill Infant Reay Primary Chadwell Heath Richard Challoner Dixons CTC St. Bartholomew's Durand Primary St. Benedict's Catholic High Gordon' St. Bernadette RC Hollingwood 1st St. Martin in Field Holy Cross Convent St. Thomas the Apostle Holywell The Gilberd Hopwood Hall Weavers Kelsey Park Woodnewton Junior Colleges of Further Education Amersham and Wycombe Manchester Barnet N E London Bilborough Newcastle Bolton Newham Sixth Form
(b) Unsuccessful applicants Local Authority Calderdale North Herts City College Manchester Northampton City of Westminster Oldham Dewsbury People's Tertiary Education Doncaster Rotherham Dudley Runshaw East Berkshire Southwark Gateshead Stoke on Trent 6th form Gateway 6th Form Stourbridge Gloscat Swindon Henley Tresham Huntingdonshire Regional Wakefield Joseph Chamberlain Walsall Keighley Wansworth Adult Kensington and Chelsea Woolwich Leyton 6th form