HL Deb 20 July 1995 vol 566 cc45-6WA
Earl Russell

asked Her Majesty's Government:

Whether they will explain their statement in Our Future Homes (Cm 2901, page 36) that allocation schemes for social tenancies "should balance specific housing needs against the need to support married couples who take a responsible approach to family life"; whether this announces an intention to discriminate against unmarried partners; what is meant by "a sensible approach" and who will be the judge of it; and how this aim is to be enforced.

Lord Lucas

The Government believe that married couples who have a clear view of their responsibilities are in the best position to create a stable home environment in which to bring up children, and we wish to encourage this. There are no plans to penalise individuals who by choice or necessity follow other lifestyles. Local authorities will be responsible for administering housing allocation schemes, in the light of any guidance which may be issued by the Secretary of State.

Earl Russell

asked Her Majesty's Government:

Whether they can achieve their stated aim, namely to "ensure that there is no necessity for people to sleep rough" (Our Future Homes, Cm 2901, page 38) while they continue to follow a policy in which some people may have no entitlement to means-tested benefits.

Lord Lucas

The noble Earl's question may arise out of concern for unemployed 16 and 17 year-olds who have no general entitlement to Income Support. The minority of such individuals who have to live independently for good reason and who are at risk of severe hardship receive income support and, where appropriate, housing benefit. There should be no necessity for such young people to sleep rough.