§
Mr. Redwood
The information requested is set out in the following table.
Welsh Office public expenditure in the supply estimates (£ million) |
|
1988–89 |
Percentage of block |
Vote 1 |
82 |
NB |
Vote 2 |
75 |
NB |
Vote 3 |
111 |
NB |
Vote 4 |
— |
NB |
Vote 5 |
215 |
7 |
Vote 6 |
87 |
3 |
Vote 7 |
278 |
9 |
Vote 8 |
856 |
27 |
Vote 9 |
42 |
1 |
Vote 10 |
— |
|
Vote 11 |
— |
|
Vote 122 |
— |
|
Vote 132 |
— |
|
552W
|
1988–89 |
Percentage of block |
The Block1 |
3,173 |
|
|
Cm. 288 |
|
|
1989–90 |
Percentage of block |
Vote 1 |
79 |
NB |
Vote 2 |
90 |
NB |
Vote 3 |
118 |
NB |
Vote 4 |
— |
NB |
Vote 5 |
258 |
7 |
Vote 6 |
122 |
3 |
Vote 7 |
305 |
9 |
Vote 8 |
963 |
28 |
Vote 9 |
46 |
1 |
Vote 10 |
— |
|
Vote 11 |
— |
|
Vote 122 |
— |
|
Vote 132 |
— |
|
The Block1 |
3,488 |
|
|
Cm. 617 |
|
|
1990–91 |
Percentage of block |
Vote 1 |
99 |
NB |
Vote 2 |
101 |
NB |
Vote 3 |
112 |
NB |
Vote 4 |
— |
NB |
Vote 5 |
322 |
8 |
Vote 6 |
485 |
12 |
Vote 7 |
315 |
8 |
Vote 8 |
1,096 |
26 |
Vote 9 |
52 |
1 |
Vote 10 |
1,604 |
39 |
Vote 11 |
30 |
1 |
Vote 122 |
— |
|
Vote 132 |
— |
|
The Block1 |
4,142 |
|
|
Cm 1,016 |
|
|
1991–92 |
Percentage of block |
Vote 1 |
112 |
NB |
Vote 2 |
113 |
NB |
Vote 3 |
84 |
NB |
Vote 4 |
— |
NB |
Vote 5 |
403 |
9 |
Vote 6 |
543 |
12 |
Vote 7 |
332 |
7 |
Vote 8 |
1,284 |
28 |
Vote 9 |
55 |
1 |
Vote 10 |
1,828 |
40 |
Vote 11 |
— |
|
Vote 122 |
— |
|
Vote 132 |
— |
|
The Block1 |
4,609 |
|
|
Cm 1,516 |
|
|
1992–93 |
Percentage of Block |
Vote 1 |
151 |
NB |
Vote 2 |
121 |
NB |
Vote 3 |
71 |
NB |
553W
|
1992–93 |
Percentage of Block |
Vote 4 |
156 |
NB |
Vote 5 |
503 |
9 |
Vote 6 |
594 |
11 |
Vote 7 |
353 |
6 |
Vote 8 |
1,435 |
26 |
Vote 9 |
60 |
1 |
Vote 10 |
2,173 |
40 |
Vote 11 |
67 |
1 |
Vote 122 |
— |
— |
Vote 132 |
— |
— |
The Block1 |
5,473 |
|
|
Cm 1916 |
|
|
1993–94 |
Percentage of Block |
Vote 1 |
193 |
NB |
Vote 2 |
174 |
NB |
Vote 3 |
7 |
NB |
Vote 4 |
147 |
NB |
Vote 5 |
787 |
14 |
Vote 6 |
619 |
11 |
Vote 7 |
371 |
6 |
Vote 8 |
1,525 |
27 |
Vote 9 |
64 |
1 |
Vote 10 |
2,150 |
37 |
Vote 11 |
3 |
0 |
Vote 122 |
4 |
0 |
Vote 132 |
2 |
0 |
The Block1 |
5,735 |
|
|
Cm 2215 |
|
|
1994–95 |
Percentage of Block |
Vote 1 |
204 |
NB |
Vote 2 |
34 |
NB |
|
157 |
2 |
Vote 3 |
6 |
0 |
Vote 4 |
564 |
9 |
Vote 5 |
488 |
8 |
Vote 6 |
605 |
9 |
Vote 7 |
365 |
6 |
Vote 8 |
1,628 |
25 |
Vote 9 |
66 |
1 |
Vote 10 |
2,214 |
35 |
Vote 11 |
5 |
0 |
Vote 122 |
7 |
0 |
Vote 132 |
14 |
0 |
|
6,410 |
|
The Block2 |
Cm 2515 |
|
Note: The symbol (—) denotes nil or less than £0.5 million.
NB=Non-Block. In 1994–95 the industry and training programmes became part of the block.
1 The totals shown for the block are not the sum of the figures for block programmes shown against individual votes. They include non-voted items such as local authority credit approvals, and for years before 1990–91, local authority grants which, although paid through the votes, did not score in the planning total.
2 The expenditure covered by these votes has changed over the years as follows: vote 12: 1988–1991, rate rebate grant; 1991–92, water privatisation; 1992–93, no vote; 1993 onwards, OHMCI; vote 13, 1988–89, transport supplementary grants; 1989–91, water privatisation; 1991–93, no vote; 1993 onwards, ERDF.