§ Mr. Jim CunninghamTo ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will set out the considerations which led him to give prominence to the title "Social Security" on new pension books; and if he will consider changing the term "Social Security" to "Pension".
§ Mr. HagueThe administration of benefit payments is a matter for Mr. Michael Bichard, the chief executive of the Benefits Agency. He will write to the hon. Member.
Letter from Michael Bichard to Mr. Jim Cunningham, dated 1 February 1994:
The Secretary of State for Social Security has asked me to respond to your recent Parliamentary Question about the wording on the cover of the new Pension Books.Firstly, it may be helpful if I explain that the design of the cover of order books is constant across all types of social security benefit, as was the case with old style order books. The reason for this is that the cover does not automatically identify which type of benefit a person is receiving, so that a casual observer cannot identify which social security benefit an individual is in receipt of simply by looking at the cover of an order book. This allows an individual's financial affairs to remain confidential.There are also practical considerations if separate covers were required for individual benefits. Perhaps the most significant would be at the printing and assembly stage. Print runs would have to be stopped to allow different covers to be loaded to reflect the type of benefit being paid which would mean additional cost implications. Consideration would also have to be given as to how a book containing a number of benefits combined would be reflected on a cover—order books are issued by benefit groups and a number of different benefits are within each group. This would only add to the difficulty in identifying which cover should be assembled to the foils.The design of the order book is constantly under review, and the cover design is a component of many considerations. The last change was introduced primarily as an anti-fraud measure and it may interest you to learn that since the introduction of the new design no counterfeits have been found to be cashed. This is a
Housing benefit cases by region 1988–89 1989–90 1990–91 1991–92 1992–93 South East (excluding London) 473,100 465,000 490,200 533,700 590,800 London 553,100 523,800 553,700 594,800 640,100 North (including Cumbria) 308,900 302,100 296,800 297,500 294,200 Wales 205,000 204,000 204,000 210,000 235,000 Scotland 565,000 557,000 542,000 541,000 624,200 Yorkshire and Humberside 402,300 391,400 388,200 398,100 388,500 East Midlands 237,300 232,300 241,800 247,500 265,800 East Anglia 111,400 105,100 111,800 118,000 129,900 South West 233,300 234,000 248,400 267,600 288,000 West Midlands 383,800 361,400 368,800 387,800 386,500 North West (excluding Cumbria) 524,400 507,200 514,400 522,600 526,400 Total 3,997,600 3,883,300 3,960,100 4,118,600 4,369,500 Source:
The Housing Benefit Management Information System quartely caseload data.
Notes:
732W
- 1. Information prior to 1988–89 is not available.
- 2. The data relates to Great Britain; figures for the United Kingdom are not available.
- 3. The figures are averages, rounded to the nearest 100, and include estimates for non-responding authorities.
- 4. The numbers are in benefit units, a benefit unit may be a couple or a single person.
- 5. The data is from a later source than that used for "Social Security Statistics".
major achievement which should result in significant savings by reducing order book fraud. It is, however, too early to estimate how great these savings will be.For the reasons stated above there are no plans to replace the term Social Security with that of Pension.I hope you find this reply helpful.