§ Mr. BettsTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) what consideration he is giving in his review of standard spending assessments to include as factors(a) unemployment, (b) health indicators, in particular standard morbidity rates, and (c) disability indicators;
(2) what plans he has to measure economic deprivation as part of his review of the standard spending assessment system; and what alternative measures he has so far considered in this regard;
(3)what conclusions he has reached on representations made to him concerning the use of health variables as a reflection of the differing social needs of an area, in place of the measures currently used;
(4)what conclusions he has reached on representations he has received concerning the extent to which the weighting within the current standards spending assessment system placed on the very elderly discriminates against those areas which have significant health problems but in which industrial traditions have lead to deaths at an earlier age.
828W
Housing investment programme (HIP) allocations12 by area £thousand 1979–80 1982–83 1985–86 1988–89 1989–90 1990–91 1991–92 1992–93 1993–94 Non Metropolitan D.C. 1,009,252 958,581 690,813 525,707 426,030 847,373 847,477 818,398 865,132 County Councils3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Metropolitan D.C. 648,540 602,396 427,151 377,511 339,386 502,755 485,552 460,156 492,922 London Boroughs4 885,894 630,241 487,083 427,141 329,244 538,164 527,396 547,553 561,412 City of London 706 720 417 281 214 708 668 605 679 England 2,544,392 2,191,938 1,605,463 1,330,640 1,094,874 1,889,000 1,861,093 1,826,712 1,920,145 1 Allocations for the years up to and including 1989–90 are final allocations, ie the initial allocation plus any increases to the initial allocation made in-year. The allocations figures for 1990–91 and subsequent years are the HIP allocations (housing annual capital guidelines plus specified capital grants) issued prior to the start of the financial year. These figures do not include any supplementary credit approvals issued during the year. 2 From 1990–91, under the new capital finance system, the HIP allocation is an assessment of relative need for housing capital expenditure rather than a directly borrowing approval. Borrowing approval is now conveyed by the single, all service, basic credit approval. 3 County councils are not allocated any monies through the Housing Investment Programme as they have no housing stock. 4 Allocations for the Greater London Council up to and including 1985–86 are included in the figures for the London boroughs.
§ Mr. Baldry[holding answer 28 October 1993]: The review of standards spending assessments has considered a wide range of issues including the potential use of indicators of health, disability, unemployment, homelessness and economic deprivation. The underlying statistical analysis has been discussed in detail with the local authority associations. Work on the review has now finished and my right hon. Friend will announce the outcome of the review later in the autumn as part of his proposals for revenue support grant for 1994–95.
§ Mr. BettsTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will as part of the standard spending assessment review consider incorporating factors which are of direct relevance to service provision rather than factors which are proxies for real needs.
§ Mr. Baldry[holding answer 28 October 1993]: The calculation of standard spending assessments uses factors which are considered to be relevant to the provision of the service in question and cannot be directly influenced by local policy decisions. Inevitably this means that in a number of cases it is necessary to use factors which act as proxies for the underlying need to spend. The review of standard spending assessments has considered the incorporation of 1991 census data and the relevance of existing and other possible new factors.