HC Deb 29 June 1992 vol 210 cc430-2W
Mr. Frank Field

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will list those local offices whose allocation of social fund moneys has now been reduced following the discovery of a computer error; and if he will detail the amount of the reduction for each office.

Mr. Scott

The information requested is in the table. The table also shows the level of extra allocation districts were allowed to retain over and above allocations due to them under the national formula in order to minimise any disruption that might otherwise have occurred.

District Reduction Retained
£ £
Bankside 51,860 27,287
Bradford (Grants) 84,083 38,028
City East 44,564 24,855
Euston (Grants) 47,358 25,786
Euston 26,629 18,876
Liverpool, North (Grants) 46,247 25,416
Liverpool, North 54,440 28,147
Liverpool, South (Grants) 77,811 35,937
Newham (Grants) 23,303 17,768
Newham 36,946 22,315
Lothian, West 75,659 35,220
Neasdon (Grants) 95,735 41,912
Neasdon 118,178 49,393
Oldham (Grants) 7,145 12,382
Staffordshire, North (Grants) 40,735 23,578
Swansea (Grants) 10,945 13,648
Worcestershire, North 69,712 33,237

Amounts refer to the loans budget unless otherwise indicated.

Mr. Peter Bottomley

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security whether he will introduce further regulations to amend the law concerning occupational and personal pension schemes.

Mr. Lilley

I have today laid before Parliament regulations which make a number of amendments in the field of occupational and personal pension schemes.

The regulations tighten existing regulations relating to the disclosure of information by trustees and administrators of occupational and personal pension schemes. The new regulations lay down time limits within which information must be disclosed to members, prospective members, beneficiaries and trade unions. They require schemes to disclose additional information following the introduction of provisions to the Social Security Act 1990, in particular, schemes must disclose:

  • the functions and address of the Pensions Ombudsman; the role and address of the Occupational Pensions Advisory Service Ltd.;
  • whether an independent trustee has been appointed by an insolvency practitioner in relation to the sponsoring employer, who he is, and, if not, why not;
  • whether the scheme has registered with the registrar of occupational and personal pension schemes;
  • whether trustees have access to guidance published by the Occupational Pensions Board on "Pension Trust Principles".

The regulations make a number of technical amendments to definitions in the Disclosure of Information Regulations and to the form of the actuary's statement.

The regulations also extend the circumstances in which small amounts of pension may be commuted to a lump sum and make a number of technical amendments to the Preservation Regulations, the Levy Regulations and the Register of Occupational and Personal Pension Schemes Regulations.

The amendments in relation to commutation and to the Levy and Register Regulations will come into force on 20 July 1992; the remainder of the regulations will come into effect on 28 September 1992.

Mr. Peter Bottomley

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security when he intends to respond to the report of the Social Security Select Committee on the operation of pension funds.

Mr. Lilley

The Government's response to the Select Committee's report is published today. We have accepted the main recommendation of the Committeethe Government should establish an inquiry operating within a strict timetable to collect evidence from the public on what the detailed structure of a new Pensions Act should be".

As I announced to the House on 8 June, I have set up a committee to examine the administration and regulation of pension schemes under the chairmanship of Professor Goode of Oxford university. Most of the Select Committee's recommendations fall within the terms of reference of the Goode committee. The Government's response to the Select Committee therefore deals specifically with those areas not covered by the review.

Forward to