§ Sir Michael MarshallTo ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will list the district health authorities in England and Wales whose 1992–93 revenue allocation is greater than 5, 10 and 15 per cent. below the target capitation figure which has been agreed by their regional health authorities.
§ Mr. SackvilleAllocations to district health authorities are the responsibility of the regional health authorities. The following information has been supplied by individual regional health authorities, and are not directly comparable. They should be taken as a broad indication of the relative positions of districts.
The table shows the districts whose 1992–93 revenue allocation is more than 5 per cent., and more than 10 per cent., less than their weighted capitation share. There is only one district, Worthing, whose 1992–93 revenue allocation is more than 15 per cent. under its weighted capitation share.
The information relating to Wales is a matter for my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Wales.
District health authority/ies Regional health authority 5 to 10 per cent. 10 to 15 per cent. Northern None None Yorkshire None None Trent None None East Anglian Huntingdon None North West Thames North Bedfordshire South Bedfordshire East Hertfordshire None North East Thames North East Essex Mid Essex Tower Hamlets Southend None South East Thames Brighton Hastings South East Kent Canterbury and Thanet South West Thames None Chichester Wessex None None Oxford Kettering None South Western Torbay None West Midlands Sandwell Dudley North Staffs. South East Staffs. None Mersey Southport and Formby Crewe North Western Blackburn Burnley Chorley Bolton Oldham Stockport Tameside Blackpool