§ Mr. BlunkettTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he has any local authorities to add to the list, given in his answer of 23 January,Official Report, column 276, of those which will lose area protection grant in 1992–93.
§ Mr. Portillo[holding answer 31 January 1992]: I regret that the table given in my answer of 23 January was incomplete. The correct information is shown in the following table.
6W
Reduction in area protection grant between 1991–92 and 1992–93 Local authority (£ million) (£ adult) Greenwich -4.1 -25 Hammersmith and Fulham -3.0 -25 Lambeth -0.4 -2 Lewisham -4.2 -25 Southwark -3.7 -25 Tower Hamlets -3.3 -25 Wandsworth -5.6 -25 Barking and Dagenham -2.8 -25 Hillingdon -3.0 -17 Rochdale -3.8 -25 Tameside -4.0 -25 Wigan -5.7 -25 Barnsley -4.3 -25 Doncaster -5.6 -25 Rotherham -4.9 -25 Sheffield -10.1 -25 Gateshead -4.2 -25 North Tyneside -2.4 -16 South Tyneside -3.0 -25 Sunderland -5.5 -25 Bradford -8.1 -25 Calderdale -3.7 -25 Kirkless -7.3 -25 Wakefield -5.9 -25 Hartlepool -1.7 -25 Langbaurgh-on-Tees -0.8 -7 Middlesbrough -1.5 -15 Allerdale -1.8 -25
Local authority (£ million) (£ adult) Barrow-in-Furness -1.5 -25 Carlisle -1.5 -19 Copeland -1.4 -25 Eden -0.9 -25 Amber Valley -2.2 -25 Bolsover -1.4 -25 Chesterfield -1.9 -25 Erewash -2.1 -25 High Peak -1.6 -25 North East Derbyshire -1.9 -25 Torridge -1.0 -25 Chester-le-Street -0.7 -18 Derwentside -1.6 -25 Durham -0.5 -7 Easington -1.9 -25 Sedgefield -1.7 -25 Teesdale -0.5 -25 Wear Valley -1.3 -25 Boothferry -1.2 -25 Cleethorpes - 1.1 -21 East Yorkshire -1.6 -25 Great Grimsby -1.4 -21 Holderness -0.3 -8 Kingston upon Hull -5.1 -25 Scunthorpe -1.2 -25 Blackburn -2.5 -25 Blackpool -1.1 -10 Burnley -1.7 -25 Hyndburn -1.5 -25 Pendle -1.7 -25 Rossendale -1.2 -25 Alnwick -0.5 -23 Berwick-upon-Tweed -0.5 -25 Blyth Valley -1.5 -25 Wansbeck -1.2 -25 Craven -1.0 -25 Ryedale -0.3 -5 Scarborough -2.1 -25 Selby -0.4 -7 York -2.0 -25 Ashfield -2.1 -25 Mansfield -1.7 -23 Stoke-on-Trent -1.5 -8