HC Deb 19 November 1991 vol 199 cc99-101W
Mr. Blunkett

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish a complete list of all those local authorities that have been issued with(a) section 13 notices, (b) section 14 notices, both under the Local Government Act 1988, (c) section 19a notices and (d) section 19b notices, both under the Local Government, Planning and Land Act 1980, giving dates of issue in each case, and indicating for each case the reason for issuing the notice.

Mr. Portillo

Following is the information:

Notices issued under section 13 of the Local Government Act 1988 where

  1. (a) the authority appeared to have acted in an anti-competitive manner
    • Birmingham City C—10 May 1990
    • Braintree DC—29 March 1990
    • Bristol City C—4 September 1989
    • Bury MBC—1 June 1990
    • Camden LB—3 July 1990
    • Charnwood BC—21 December 1989
    • Doncaster MBC—21 September 1990
    • East Lindsey DC—9 April 1990
    • Eden DC—29 March 1990
    • Halton BC—9 October 1991
    • Haringey LB—12 November 1991
    • Hillingdon LB—4 September 1989
    • Knowsley MBC—7 December 1989
    • Leicester City C—11 September 1990
    • Liverpool City C—31 May 1990
    • Redditch BC—18 January 1991
    • Thurrock DC—3 October 1990
    • Wakefield MBC—6 March 1991
    • Warrington DC—2 August 1991
    • Waveney DC—24 July 1991
    • Wolverhampton MBC—3 January 1990
    • Woodspring DC—6 September 1990
    • York City C—10 May 1990
  2. (b) the authority appeared to have failed to achieve the prescribed financial objective
    • Breckland DC—19 September 1991
    • Camden LB—3 July 1990
    • Crawley BC—29 July 1991
    • Crawley BC (2 notices)—9 October 1991
    • Eastleigh BC—18 December 1990
    • Epsom and Ewell BC—1 July 1991
    • Gloucester City C—28 October 1991
    • Gosport BC—29 July 1991
    • Harrogate BC—1 July 1991
    • Haringey LB—12 December 1990
    • Humberside CC—8 June 1990
    • Lewes DC—28 October 1991
    • North Tyneside MBC—1 July 1991
    • Redbridge LB—1 July 1991
    • Shropshire CC—28 October 1991
    • Surrey CC—28 October 1991
      • 100
    • Waverley DC–28 October 1991
    • West Devon DC–1 July 1991
    • and
  3. (c) the authority appeared to have failed to comply with the detailed specification for the work
    • Camden LB—3 July 1990

Directions served under section 14 of the Local Government Act 1988 where

  1. (a) the authority appeared to have acted in an anti-competitive manner
    • Doncaster MBC—11 December 1990 (replacement direction issued 28 March 1991)
    • Hillingdon LB—13 March 1990 (replacement direction issued 1 August 1990)
    • East Lindsey DC—6 July 1990 (replacement direction issued 31 July 1990)
    • Knowsley MBC—6 July 1990 (replacement direction issued 3 August 1990)
    • Leicester City C—19 December 1990 (replacement direction issued 29 January 1991)
    • Liverpool City C—6 August 1990 (replacement direction issued 24 June 1991)
    • Redditch BC—5 March 1991
    • Thurrock DC—19 December 1990 (replacement direction issued 5 March 1991)
    • Wakefield MBC—15 August 1991
    • Woodspring DC—8 November 1990
    • York City C—9 August 1990 (replacement direction issued 13 September 1990).
  2. (b) the authority appeared to have failed to achieve the prescribed financial objective
    • Camden LB—31 October 1990
    • Eastleigh BC—9 April 1991
    • Haringey LB—20 June 1991
    • Harrogate BC—15 November 1991
    • Humberside CC—30 July 1990
    • and
  3. (c) the authority appeared to have failed to comply with the detailed specification for the work
    • Camden LB–31 October 1990.

Notices issued under section 19A of the Local Government, Planning and Land Act 1980 where

  1. (a) the authority appeared to have acted in an anti-competitive manner
    • Wirral MBC—28 March 1989
    • Liverpool City—30 May 1991
    • Salford City C—1 July
    • and
  2. (b) where the authority appeared to have failed to achieve the prescribed financial objective
    • Barrow in Furness DC—1 July 1991
    • Brent LB—20 December 1989
    • Bromley LB—29 July 1991
    • Camden LB—1 July 1991
    • Copeland BC—9 July 1991
    • Eastleigh BC (2 notices)—18 December 1990
    • Greenwich LB—10 April 1991
    • Harrogate BC (2 notices)—1 July 1991
    • Kingston Upon Thames LB—29 July 1991
    • Milton Keynes BC—15 October 1991
    • Portsmouth City C—29 July 1991
    • Rochdale MBC—7 February 1991
    • Salford MBC—1 July 1991
    • Shepway DC—1 July 1991
    • Stroud DC—10 April 1991
    • Tonbridge & Malting BC—10 October 1990
    • Tower Hamlets LB —1 July 1991
    • Waltham Forest LB—29 July 1991
    • Warrington DC—29 July 1991
    • Worthing BC—29 July 1991
    • Wychavon DC—29 July 1991
    • Wycombe DC—12 December 1990

Directions served under section 19B of the Local Government planning Act 1980 where

  1. (a) the authority appeared to have acted in an anti-competitive manner
    • Wirral MBC–23 October 1989
    • and
  2. (b) where the authority appeared to have failed to achieve the prescribed financial objective
    • Brent LB—24 July 1990
    • Barrow-in-Furness DC—15 November 1991
    • Greenwich LB—25 September 1991
    • Harrogate BC (2 notices)—15 November 1991
    • Shepway DC—15 November 1991
    • Tonbridge & Mailing BC—28 February 1991

Directions served under section 19B of the Local Government Planning Act 1980 where

  1. the authority appeared to have acted in an anti-competitive manner
    • Wirral MBC—23 October 1989
    • and
  2. (b) where the authority appeared to have failed to achieve the prescribed financial objective
    • Brent LB—24 July 1990
    • Barrow-in-Furness DC—15 November 1991
    • Greenwich LB-—25 September 1991
    • Harrogate BC (2 notices)-I5 November 1991
    • Shepway DC—15 November 1991
    • Tonbridge & Mailing BC—28 February 1991

Forward to