HC Deb 30 April 1991 vol 190 cc95-6W
Mr. Peter Bottomley

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what evidence he has on the effectiveness of random mass alcohol testing of drivers in securing continuing reductions in drink driving after any one-off drop.

Mr. Chope

The best evidence we have on the effect of random breath testing come from New South Wales. The table below shows its effectiveness in reducing the proportion of drivers and riders killed who were over the limit since its introduction in 1982. Following the effect of an "on-off" drop that might be attributed to the introduction of such a measure, levels have remained largely unchanged.

Proportion of drivers and riders killed, whose alcohol level was known, over the legal limit
New South Wales Great Britain
per cent. per cent.
1982 40 33
1983 36 28
1984 33 26
1985 33 26
1986 34 24
1987 32 23
1988 31 21
1989 33 119
1 Provisional.

A comparison with the proportional fall in Britain shows that our approach, of seeking to change public attitudes through a carefully targeted campaign, has been more successful.

The legal limit in New South Wales is 50 milligrammes of alcohol per millilitre of blood, compared with 80 in Great Britain.