HC Deb 19 November 1990 vol 181 cc1-2W
Mr. Pike

To ask the Attorney-General what information he has regarding the decision of the Crown prosecution service not to proceed with the case against David Holt for the alleged manslaughter of George Kenyon on 24 May 1988.

The Attorney-General

The decision not to proceed with the case against David Holt for the alleged manslaughter of George Kenyon followed a review of the case against him after the case was committed for trial. The Crown prosecution service accepted the advice of leading counsel that there was not a realistic prospect of satisfying a jury beyond reasonable doubt that Mr. Holt was guilty of

1. Cases1 considered by Immigration Adjudicators
Thanet House, London Harmondsworth2 Birmingham Leeds3 Manchester
19864 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
1987 3,092 1,392 1,046 905 749
1988 3,335 2,016 1,181 926 778
1989 5,934 2,760 2,368 1,628 1,271
19905 6,112 2,437 1,416 1,049 824
1 Figures are only available for cases, which can consist of more than one appellant. Figures relate to cases allowed, dismissed and withdrawn.
2 Includes hearings at Belfast and Cardiff.
3 Includes hearings at Glasgow and Edinburgh.
4 Immigration Adjudicators disposed of 8,483 cases in 1986, but a breakdown for the individual centres is not readily available.
5 January–September

2. Cases1 considered by the Immigration Appeal Tribunals2
No.
1986 1,004
1987 1,127
1988 1,029
1989 706
19903 614
1 Figures are only available for cases, which can consist of more than one appellant. Figures relate to cases allowed, dismissed and withdrawn.
2 The Immigration Appeal Tribunal sits at Thanet House, London.
3 January–October.

Mr. Harry Barnes

To ask the Attorney-General what provisions exist for bringing forward the dates of appeal hearings when there have been significant delays by foreign embassies in forwarding appeal papers for the immigration appellate authorities.

The Attorney-General

The immigration appellate authorities give full consideration to all applications made to them from either party for the early hearing of any appeal.

manslaughter. He was, however, prosecuted and convicted for the offence of operating a machine after a prohibition notice had been served.

I have written to the hon. Member with fuller details regarding the decision.

Mr. Pike

To ask the Attorney-General whether he has received any representations regarding the case against David Holt and Norman Holt for the alleged manslaughter of George Kenyon on 24 May 1988; and if he will make a statement.

The Attorney-General

Prior to receiving the hon. Member's question, I have received representations in correspondence from two hon. Members regarding the case against David Holt and Norman Holt for the alleged manslaughter of George Kenyon.