§ 23. Mr. Patrick ThompsonTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he has had any recent representations seeking replacement of the community charge with a tax on property values.
§ Mr. PortilloAs far as I am aware no one has made a representation to me in favour of a roof tax based on capital or site values.
§ 26. Mr. FavellTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment how many suggestions he has received for alternatives to the community charge for the raising of local government finance.
§ Mr. ChopeI receive a large number of suggestions on local government finance. There is no intention, however, to replace the community charge as the fairest means of securing a contribution from local residents towards the cost of local services.
§ 31. Mr. Nicholas BennettTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the average level of community charge in inner London in boroughs that were(a) Conservative controlled and (b) Labour-controlled before 3 May.
240W
§ Mr. ChopeThe figures are as follows: Conservative-controlled, £209; Labour-controlled, £445. They are based on charges at 1 April 1990.
§ 34. Mr. Terry DavisTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will estimate the average community charge for all the metropolitan districts if the percentage of their expenditure met from external funding was the same as Wandsworth; and if he will make a statement.
§ 41. Mr. EasthamTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will estimate the average community charge for all the London boroughs if the percentage of their expenditure met from external funding was the same as Wandsworth; and if he will make a statement.
§ 44. Mr. Chris SmithTo ask the Secretary of State For the Environment if he will estimate the average community charge for all the London boroughs if the percentage of their expenditure met from external funding was the same as Wandsworth; and if he will make a statement.
§ 52. Ms. MowlamTo ask the Secretary of State for t he Environment if he will estimate the average community charge for all the London boroughs if the percentage of their expenditure met from external funding was the same as Wandsworth; and if he will make a statement.
§ 57. Mr. CabornTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will estimate the average community charge for all the metropolitan districts if the percentage of their expenditure met from external funding was the same as Wandsworth; and if he will make a statement.
§ 61. Mr. PatchettTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will estimate the average community charge for all the metropolitan districts if the percentage of their expenditure met from external funding was the same as Wandsworth; and if he will make a statement.
§ Mr. Harry BarnesTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will estimate the average community charge for all the metropolitan districts if the percentage of their expenditure met from external funding was the same as Wandsworth; and if he will make a statement.
§ Mrs. MahonTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will estimate the average community charge for all the metropolitan districts if the percentage of their expenditure met from external funding was the same as Wandsworth; and if he will make a statement.
§ Mr. ChopeThe community charge everywhere in England would be £278 if councils budgeted in accordance with their standard spending assessment after disregarding the effect of the safety net and other special reliefs, low rateable value grant and inner London education grant. For every additional £1 per adult spent the community charge per adult is increased by £1. For every £1 per adult saved the community charge per adult is reduced by £1. Any grant or support system based upon the spending decisions rather than the needs of individual authorities would penalise the prudent and reward the extravagant.
§ 81. Mr. John HughesTo ask the Secretary of State For the Environment what steps he has taken to invite interested groups and local authorities to submit views on the changes desirable to the community charge; and if he will make a statement.
241W
§ 39. Mr. Bill MichieTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what steps he has taken to invite interested groups and local authorities to submit views on the changes desirable to the community charge; and if he will make a statement.
§ Mr. ChopeInterested groups and local authorities do not, in my experience, need formal invitations to submit views on the community charge. I have received a large number of comments and suggestions on the subject. Constructive comment is always welcome.
§ 42. Mr. PawseyTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will estimate what changes are likely to take place in the standard spending assessment as it relates to Warwickshire.
§ Mr. ChopeMy right hon. Friend has said that he will consider any fresh evidence on standard spending assessments (SSAs) which is put before him. Officials are also involved in discussions with local authority representatives. It is too early to say whether this work will result in changes to SSAs.
§ 47. Mr. Robert HicksTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the number of representations that he has received from Cornwall and Devon about the community charge; and if he will make a statement.
§ Mr. ChopeThe information requested by my hon. Friend is not available. However, I continue to receive representations from members of the public in Cornwall and Devon about the community charge.
49. Mr. Andy StewartTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what would be the average capital value rates bill on a property worth(a) £50,000, (b) £80,000 and (c) £100,000 in Dagenham in 1990–91 assuming such a system had to raise the same amount of revenue as the community charge.
§ Mr. ChopeFigures placed in the Library on 4 April show illustrative levels of capital value based rates in 1990–91 were such a system to be used to raise the same amount nationally as the community charge. The implied bills in Barking and Dagenham for properties worth(a) £50,000, (b) £80,000 and (c) £100,000 are £546, £874 and £1,092 respectively.
§ 51. Mr. NellistTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will provide details of the review into the poll tax being undertaken by his Department; and if he will make a statement.
§ 66. Mr. BeithTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what further measures he is considering in respect of the poll tax.
§ 84. Mr. MacdonaldTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement on the proposals for changes to the poll tax currently under review.
§ 95. Mr. Andrew SmithTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement on proposals for changes to the poll tax currently under review.
§ Mr. BeithTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he has any plans to reduce the impact of the poll tax on lower income families during the current year.
242W
§ Mr. PortilloWe are looking to see what improvements, if any, should be made to the operation of the community charge. If and when any such improvements are identified they will be announced.
§ 56. Mr. GrocottTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what representations he has received on changes to the poll tax in 1991–92.
§ Mr. PortilloI receive a large number of suggestions on local government finance. However, the community charge is the fairest means of securing a contribution from local residents towards the cost of local services.
§ 60. Mr. Allen McKayTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment when he intends to meet representatives of local authority organisations to discuss the poll tax; and if he will make a statement.
§ Mr. ChopeMy right hon. Friend met representatives of the local authority associations on 21 May to discuss the community charge.
§ 62. Mr. Tony LloydTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what representations he has received on changes to the poll tax in 1991–92.
§ Mr. PortilloI have received a wide variety of suggestions including many designed to reduce the level of charge which some authorities are levying.
§ Mr. Andrew MacKayTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement on the implementation of the community charge.
§ Mr. ChopeThe vast majority of local authorities in England have been working very hard to ensure that the new system is working efficiently in 1990–91. The registration process was successfully completed on time with a total figure in accordance with the Government's estimate of the adult population. All authorities have now sent out some bills and are beginning to collect the community charge. Almost all authorities sent out their bills net of transitional relief and community charge benefit.
§ 73. Dr. Michael ClarkTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what a person on average male earnings would pay in local income tax in 1990–91 in order to raise the same amount of revenue as the community charge in Yeovil.
§ 94. Mr. SummersonTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what a person on average male earnings would pay in local income tax in 1990–91 in order to raise the same amount of revenue as the community charge in England.
§ Mr. PortilloThe level of local income tax payable by a person on average male earnings would depend on the precise way in which such a system were introduced and on the tax allowances which were available.
Illustrative figures exemplifying possible local income tax rates and the bill payable with a taxable income of £12,800 were placed in the Library on 4 April.
For South Somerset this showed a bill of £955 and an England average bill of £949.
§ 74. Mr. WilshireTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what would be the average capital value 243W rates bill on a property worth (a) £80,000 and (b) £100,000 in Spelthorne in 1990–91 assuming such a system had to raise the same amount of revenue as the community charge.
§ Mr. ChopeFigures placed in the Library on 4 April show illustrative levels of capital value based rates in 1990–91 were such a system to be used to raise the same amount nationally as the community charge. The implied bills in Spelthorne for properties worth(a) £80,000 and (b) £100,000 are £789 and £986 respectively.
§ 101. Dr. TwinnTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the average level of community charge, discounting the safety net, in London in boroughs that were(a) Conservative controlled and (b) Labour controlled before 3 May.
§ Mr. ChopeThe following are the figures: Conservative-controlled, £267; Labour-controlled, £478. They are based on charges at 1 April 1990.
§ 109. Mr. David ShawTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what would be the average capital value rates bill on a property worth (i) £50,000, (ii) £80,000 and (iii) £100,000 in(a) the metropolitan areas and (b) Dover in 1990–91, assuming such a system had to raise the same amount of revenue as the community charge.
§ Mr. ChopeFigures placed in the Library on 4 April show illustrative levels of capital value based rates in 1990–91 were such a system to be used to raise the same amount nationally as the community charge. The implied average bills in(a) the metropolitan areas for properties worth (i) £50,000, (ii) £80,000 and (iii) £100,000 are £543, £868 and £1,086 respectively and in (b) Dover £436, £697 and £871 respectively.
§ 111. Mr. BarronTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what information he has on services being cut by the charge-capped local authorities.
§ Mr. PortilloLocal authorities which did not accept the caps which my right hon. Friend proposed and which put forward alternative figures have provided him with information about the implications of the proposed caps. My right hon. Friend is carefully considering all the information available to him before taking his decisions on the final caps of these authorities.
§ Mr. WigleyTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what guidance the Government are giving to local authorities in England on keeping the poll tax register up to date; and if he will make a statement.
§ Mr. ChopePractice note No. 3, "The Community Charges Register", which was produced jointly by the Government and the local authority associations, contains guidance on the maintenance of the register and subsequent canvasses. Copies have already been placed in the Library of the House. We have prepared more detailed guidance to local authorities in a new practice note, "Maintaining the Community Charges Register" which we propose to issue as soon as possible.
§ Sir Ian GilmourTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish figures showing average local authority rents and average local authority rates in each local authority area in 1989–90 and average local authority rents and the new community charge in the same areas in 1990–91.
244W
§ Mr. Chris Patten[holding answer 17 May 1990]: I am arranging for tables to be placed in the Library of the House showing, for each authority, (a) the average weekly rent in 1989–90, (b) the percentage increase in rent in 1990–91 over 1989–90 as reported to the Department on subsidy claim forms, where available, (c) the average community charge at 1 April 1990 and (d) the average rate bill per household in 1989–90. Information on the level of rents in 1990–91 is not yet available.
§ 25. Mr. CanavanTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will make an official visit to Italy for the world cup; and if he will make a statement.
§ 88. Mr. AshtonTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement on the visit to Italy by the Minister for Sport to discuss crowd control with the organisers of the world cup.
§ Mr. MoynihanI visited Rome, Cagliari, Milan and Genoa between 7 and 10 May and held productive discussions with the Italian authorities about safety and security arrangements in connection with England's participation in the World Cup finals. We were able to reach agreement on a range of important issues including the commitment of the Italian Government to prosecute English supporters who break Italian law and to deport those whose behaviour was undesirable.
Other measures agreed include arrangements at the port of Genoa, restrictions on the sale of alcohol arid sporting weapons, ticket sales, ground security, segregation of rival supporters, and police arrangements during the tournament.