40. Mr. FayeTo ask the Secretary of State for Health whether he has received any representations claiming that patients are being removed from doctors' lists as a result of the new general practitioners' contract.
578W
Expenditure by FPCs (England): 1979–80–1990–91 Practice Staff and Premises In Cash At 1990–91 Prices1 £million £million Year Staff Premises Total Staff Premises Total 1979–802 50.927 20.408 71.335 108.704 43.561 152.265 1980–81 65.063 26.696 91.759 117.354 48.152 165.506 1981–82 78.769 32.319 111.088 129.410 53.097 182.507 1982–83 89.480 39.141 128.621 137.101 59.972 197.073 1983–84 102.721 47.489 150.210 150.373 69.519 219.892 1984–85 114.632 54.481 169.113 159.866 75.979 235.845 1985–86 134.028 67.030 201.058 177.399 88.721 266.120 1986–87 143.838 74.535 218.373 184.127 95.412 279.539 1987–88 166.798 83.726 250.524 202.660 101.727 304.387 1988–89 200.508 96.396 296.904 227.416 109.332 336.748 1989–903 242.099 121.940 364.039 257.835 129.866 387.701 1990–914 261–072 165.032 426.104 261.072 165.032 426.104 Total 1,649.935 829.193 2,479.128 2,113.317 1,040.370 3,153.687 1 Delated using GDP Deflator. 2 Figures for 1979–80 to 1988–89 are taken from Summarised Accounts (England), and show direct reimbursement of 70 per cent, of the cost of practice staff, direct reimbursement of rent and rates and improvement grants. The rest of the cost of practice staff is reimbursed indirectly through GPs' fees and allowances. 3 1989–90 figures are on a similar basis but show provisional out-turn. 4 1990–91 figures are preliminary allocations for cash limited expenditure on direct reimbursement of practice staff costs, cost rents and improvement grants and estimated non cash limited expenditure on other rent and rates.
§ Mr. Kenneth ClarkeI have received a number of such representations and I have had the facts investigated wherever possible. None of these cases has proved to result from the GPs' new contract and some well-reported complaints have proved to be quite inaccurate. As I have repeatedly said, it is dishonest and unprofessional for GPs to suggest that the Government's new contract justifies the removal of any patient from a practice list.
§ 43. Mr. Brandon-BravoTo ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment he has made of the effect of the new general practitioners' contract on the family doctor service.
§ 49. Mr. KennedyTo ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will make a statement on the operation of the new general practitioner contracts.
§ 69. Mr Charles WardleTo ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment he has made of the effect on service to patients of the new general practitioners' contract.
§ Mrs. Virginia BottomleyI refer my hon. Friends and the hon. Member to the reply my right hon. and learned Friend the Secretary of State gave the hon. Member for Cunninghame, South (Mr. Lambie) on I May at columns517–18.