§ Mr. AshleyTo ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will list the regional health authorities in rank order according to the percentage of National Health Service money(a) allocated to the regions in 1989–90 and (b) that will be allocated in 1990–91 using the new formula.
§ Mr. Freeman[holding answer 15 February 1996]: The table gives the ranking of each regional health authority according to the percentage of National Health Service money allocated in 1989–90 and 1990–91:
Region Ranking 1989–90 Ranking 1990–91 Northern 10 10 Yorkshire 6 6 Trent 2 2 East Anglian 14 14 North West Thames 7 7 North East Thames 4 4 South East Thames 5 5 South West Thames 8 8 Wessex 11 11 Oxford 13 13 South Western 9 9 West Midlands 1 1 Mersey 12 12 North Western 3 3 Notes:
1. 1989–90 is based on allocations for services provided in the region using the resource allocation working party formula (RAWP).
2. 1990–91 is based on the allocations for resident population, calculated using the new allocation formula, adjusted for the effect of cross boundary flows, so that they are on a comparable basis to 1989–90.
3. Both 1989–90 and 1990–91 are before the additions for SIFT supra-regional services and other special additions specific to individual regions.
§ Mr. AshleyTo ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will list the regional health authorities in rank order according to the growth money(a) they received in 1989–90 and (b) will receive on current assumptions in 1990–91.
551W
§ Mr. Freeman[holding answer 15 February 1990]: The table gives the ranking for each regional health authority according to the amount of cash increase over the previous baseline for the region, allocated for 1989–90 and 1990–91:
Region Ranking Ranking 1989–90 1990–91 Northern 9 11 Yorkshire 6 7 Trent 2 2 East Anglian 14 12 North West Thames 7 10 North East Thames 4 4 South East Thames 5 3 South West Thames 8 8 Wessex 11 9 Oxford 13 13 South Western 9 6 West Midlands 1 1 Mersey 12 14 North Western 3 5 Notes:
1. 1989–90 is based on the allocations for services provided in the Region using the resource allocation working party formula
Domestic rateable subjects at 1 April 1988 Stirling Perth and Kinross Ross and Cromarty Skye and Lochalsh Bands of rateable value Number Total rateable value (£) Number Total rateable value (£) Number Total rateable value (£) Number Total rateable value (£) £0 to £300 677 127,893 3,201 505,831 2,351 419,310 1,106 168,606 £301 to £600 13,435 6,551,918 25,321 11,489,921 10,309 4,843,669 1,832 797,024 £601 to £900 9,286 6,576,092 12,951 9,312,270 4,209 3,013,623 544 395,687 £901 to £1,200 4,376 4,553,954 6,870 7,138,130 1,379 1,390,534 179 180,148 £1,201 to £1,500 2,176 2,884,471 2,807 3,727,934 199 261,652 27 35,006 Over £1,500 1,341 2,386,397 1,078 1,876,567 79 153,699 13 25,910 Croft houses/separately assessed caravans 127 38,106 270 55,701 1,572 397,544 1,935 445,746 Total 31,418 23,118,831 52,498 34,106.354 20,098 10,480,031 5,636 2,048,127