§ Mr. Andrew WelshTo ask the Secretary of State for Scotland (1) what action he is taking this year to promote or publicise the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations; and what estimates he has of the costs involved for the agricultural industry in complying with these regulations;
(2) what estimates he has of the costs involved in implementing the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations for (a) industry and (b) small businesses in Scotland; and what steps he is taking in the current year to promote or publicise these regulations for those sectors.
§ Mr. NichollsI have been asked to reply.
Where substances hazardous to health were adequately and reliably controlled and where there was full compliance with existing legislation, the costs of implementing the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) Regulations should be marginal; they will arise mainly from reviewing and formalising existing arrangements. The Health and Safety Executive estimated in its cost-benefit analysis for the COSHH proposals that for a typical small firm, the additional costs arising would amount to no more than about one quarter of a percentage point of the firm's net output. This estimate included the costs of monitoring of exposure and health surveillance which apply to only a minority of firms. For most larger firms, the costs will be substantially smaller in relation to net output.
No special analysis for any particular geographical region, nor for any sector of activity, including agriculture, has been carried out.
The Health and Safety Executive has promoted and publicised the regulations by a variety of means, including national and trade advertising and the distribution of some 3.5 million introductory leaflets. Many activities have been 224W particularly geared to the need to reach small firms, including the provision of information to the principal small firms advisory organisations.