HC Deb 08 February 1989 vol 146 cc709-10W
Mr. Teddy Taylor

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what was the original saving of the measures set out in European Economic Community document 8903/88 on beef and veal; with what the saving was compared; and what alterations were made to this proposed saving in consequence of the changes agreed at the Council meeting on 23 January.

Mr. Donald Thompson

[holding answer 7 February 1989]: The European Commission's estimate of the savings over the 1989 preliminary draft budget which would have been brought about by the adoption of its proposals for the reform of the beef regime (set out in document 8903/88 (COM(88)529), as amended) were 51 mecu (£33 million) in 1989 and 55 mecu (£35.5 million) in a full year. The 1989 budget as adopted was consistent with these proposals. The Commission has revised its forecasts to take account of the decisions of the 23–24 January Council of Ministers and the present prospects for the market and predicts a further saving of 11 mecu (£7 million) in 1989. The Commission estimates that the full year effect of the measures as adopted will be a cost of 23 mecu (£15 million).

Mr. Teddy Taylor

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if the exceptional circumstance clause was included in the final text of the measures on beef and veal agreed by the European Economic Community Council on 23 January; and if he will make a statement.

Mr. Donald Thompson

[holding answer 7 February 1989]: The Council of Ministers decided that in various circumstances buying into intervention could take place outside the limit of 220,000 tonnes a year. These would include the exceptional circumstances envisaged in the Commission's original proposals and also if there were market weakness defined in either of two ways. The first is if the average market price in at least three member states or regions which together account for at least 55 per cent. of the Community production of the category concerned falls below 80 per cent. of the institutional intervention price; and the second, if the Community price falls below 78 per cent. of the institutional intervention price. Legal texts have yet to be adopted implementing these provisions.

These concessions on beef intervention were one of the reasons why we voted against the package.

Forward to