§ Dr. CunninghamTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if, further to his answer of 17 April,Official Report, column 36, to the hon. Member for Isle of Wight (Mr. Field) he will list the approximately 80 complaints of alleged anti-competitive practices identifying the local authorities involved.
§ Mr. Ridley[holding answer 26 April 1989]: The Department has received complaints alleging anticompetitive behaviour by the following authorities:
- Alnwich DC
- Barking and Dagenham LB
- Barnsley MBC
- Barrow-in-Furness BC
- Beverley BC
- Birmingham CC
- Bolton MBC
- Braintree DC
- Brighton BC
- Bristol CC
- Bromley LB
- Broxbourne DC
- Broxtowe BC
- Buckinghamshire CC
- Carlisle BC
- Carrick DC
- Charnwood BC
- Christchurch DC
- Cleveland CC
- Corby DC
- Cotswold DC
- Darlington BC
- Eastleigh BC
- East Staffordshire DC
- East Sussex CC
- Ellesmere Port and Neston BC
- Exeter CC
- Forest of Dean DC
- Gloucester CC
659 - Gosport BC
- Guildford BC
- Halton BC
- Havant BC
- Hereford CC
- Horsham DC
- Hove BC
- Lancashire CC
- Leeds CC
- Maidstone BC
- Melton BC
- Middlesbrough BC
- Newark and Sherwood DC
- Newbury DC
- Norfolk CC
- North Cornwall DC
- North Yorkshire CC
- Peterborough CC
- Purbeck DC
- Reading BC
- Ribble Valley BC
- Rochdale MBC
- Rother DC
- Rotherham BC
- Rugby BC
- Sedgefield DC
- Sefton BC
- South Buckinghamshire DC
- South Kesteven DC
- South Tyneside MBC
- South Wight BC
- Southwark LB
- Stafford BC
- Staffordshire Moorlands DC
- Stevenage BC
- Stroud DC
- Tameside BC
- Taunton Deane BC
- Test Valley DC
- Wakefield MBC
- Waltham Forest LB
- Worcester CC
- Worthing BC
- Wycombe DC
- Wyre Forest DC
- York CC