§ 11. Mrs. GoldingTo ask the Scretary of State for Energy when he expects to complete his consultations about statutory obligations and supply regulations in the electricity supply industry following privatisation; and if he will make a statement.
§ Mr. Michael SpicerA large number of responses to the supply code consultation document have been received, and these are being considered.
§ 40. Mr. HardyTo ask the Secretary of State for Energy what effect he expects the privatisation of electricity will have on the numbers of people employed in the supply industry.
§ Mr. Michael SpicerManning levels after privatisation will be a matter for the industry, as is the case now.
§ 41. Mr. DykesTo ask the Secretary of State for Energy if he will have further planning discussions with representatives of the area electricity boards prior to presenting future legislation on privatisation, in respect of the forthcoming operational framework for the boards' respective retail outlets.
§ Mr. Michael SpicerMy right hon. Friend and I meet the chairmen of the area boards from time to time to dicuss a number of privatisation matters. The operational framework for the boards' retail outlets is still under consideration.
§ Mr. ThurnhamTo ask the Secretary of State for Energy what further representations he has received about the proposals for privatisation of the electricity supply industry; and if he will make a statement.
28W
§ Mr. Michael SpicerI continue to receive many representations on electricity privatisation.
§ 24. Mr. DalyellTo ask the Secretary of State for Energy if, pursuant to his answer of 9 May,Official Report column 3, he will itemise all additional costs arising from his proposals in relation to the operational control of the national grid; what estimates of each of these costs he has received from Lord Marshall; and if he will make a statement.
§ Mr. Michael SpicerThe Government believe that any additional costs arising from the transfer of ownership of the national grid to the distribution companies will be outweighed by the benefits from increased competition.