HC Deb 30 November 1987 vol 123 cc434-7W
Mr. Butterfill

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how much local highway authority expenditure he intends to accept for transport supplementary grant in 1988–89; and if he will make a statement.

Mr. Channon

I have decided to accept £382 million of local authority highway expenditure for transport supplementary grant in 1988–89. Grant will be paid on this expenditure at a flat rate of 50 per cent. The total of £191 million TSG is more than 6 per cent, higher than for 1987–88.

A total of 67 new major — that is, costing over £1 million — schemes will be supported through TSG for the first time. Among these are the Dartford northern bypass; Lower road widening, Southwark; Park road relief road, Liverpool; a further stage of the Avon ring road; and other important improvements in both urban and rural areas.

More than 260 other major schemes will continue to receive TSG support. Many of these schemes are already under construction or are due to start in the current financial year. With TSG support to their road programmes, local authorities have reported completion of 49 schemes costing £145 million in 1986–87 and a start of works on 57 schemes costing £197 million. During 1987–88, they plan to complete a further 66 schemes costing £249 million and start 72 costing £372 million.

In deciding the distribution of transport supplementary grant for 1988–89, I have considered carefully the transport policies and programmes submitted by each local highway authority, and have looked at the extent to which authorities' programmes relate to roads of more than local importance. Many local authority roads — such as major urban roads and roads on the primary route network — carry significant amounts of longer-distance through traffic, and thus complement the trunk road network. Improvements to such roads are important locally because they save lives, reduce congestion and relieve communities from the effects of through traffic. They are also of national benefit by aiding the efficient flow of goods, people and services. TSG reflects the national taxpayers' interest in helping local authorities to improve these roads.

Many smaller schemes on these heavily trafficked roads produce very significant accident savings and other benefits. I have therefore taken into account almost £59 million of expenditure on minor (under £1 million) schemes for grant in 1988–89, an increase of 7.3 per cent, on 1987–88.

The amount of expenditure accepted for TSG and the amount of grant for each local highway authority is set out in the table below. Councils are being informed individually today of their own figures.

The Distribution of Transport Supplementary Grant for 1988–89
£ million
Authority Expenditure accepted for TSG Grant
Avon 8.612 4.306
Bedfordshire 6.498 3.249
Berkshire 5.376 2.688
Buckinghamshire 1.414 0.707
Cambridgeshire 4.510 2.255
Cheshire 2.728 1.364
Cleveland 6.324 3.162
Cornwall 4.540 2.270
Cumbria 2.800 1.400
Derbyshire 1.366 0.683
Devon 7.002 3.501
Dorset 8.640 4.320
Durham 3.876 1.938
East Sussex 4.242 2.121
Essex 17.460 8.730
Gloucestershire 2.154 1.077
Authority Expenditure accepted for TSG Grant
Hampshire 8.230 4.115
Hereford and Worcester 3.952 1.976
Hertfordshire 6.190 3.095
Humberside 9.036 4.518
Isle of Wight 1.454 0.727
Kent 18.510 9.255
Lancashire 9.366 4.683
Leicestershire 9.890 4.945
Lincolnshire 2.278 1.139
Norfolk 4.300 2.150
Northamptonshire 6.470 3.235
Northumberland 1.088 0.544
North Yorkshire 3.850 1.925
Nottinghamshire 4.074 2.037
Oxfordshire 1.426 0.713
Shropshire 3.500 1.750
Somerset 6.422 3.211
Staffordshire 5.644 2.822
Suffolk 3.506 1.753
Surrey 4.472 2.236
Warwickshire 3.492 1.746
West Sussex 5.460 2.730
Wiltshire 0.722 0.361
Total Shire Counties 210.874 105.43'?
Bolton 2.686 1.343
Bury 2.020 1.010
Manchester 6.290 3.145
Oldham 2.240 1.120
Rochdale 0.570 0.285
Salford 7.692 3.846
Stockport 0.360 0.180
Tameside 0.620 0.310
Trafford 1.284 0.642
Wigan 4.630 2.315
Total Greater Manchester Districts 28.392 14.196
Knowsley 0.484 0.242
Liverpool 2.470 1.235
St. Helens 1.270 0.635
Sefton 0.342 0.171
Wirral 2.460 1.230
Total Merseyside Districts 7.026 3.513
Barnsley 0.800 0.400
Doncaster 0.942 0.471
Rotherham 0.446 0.223
Sheffield 0.760 0.380
Total South Yorkshire Districts 2.948 1.474
Gateshead 3.990 1.995
Newcastle upon Tyne 4.570 2.285
North Tyneside 0.760 0.380
South Tyneside 0.720 0.360
Sunderland 3.154 1.577
Total Tyne and Wear Districts 13.194 6.597
Birmingham 7.806 3.903
Coventry 3.884 1.942
Dudley 1.384 0.692
Sandwell 1.834 0.917
Solihull 1.020 0.510
Walsall 3.156 1.578
Wolverhampton 6.922 3.461
Total West Midlands Districts 26.006 13.003
Bradford 3.372 1.686
Calderdale 0.420 0.210
Kirklees 2.638 1.319
Authority Expenditure accepted for TSG Grant
Leeds 3.046 1.523
Wakefield 0.526 0.263
Total West Yorkshire Districts 10.002 5.001
Total Metropolitan Districts 87.568 43.784
City of London 0.366 0.183
Barking and Dagenham 5.672 2.836
Barnet 0.800 0.400
Bexley 1.298 0.649
Brent 0.872 0.436
Bromley 7.766 3.883
Camden 0.262 0.131
Croydon 0.468 0.234
Ealing 3.876 1.938
Enfield 22.510 11.255
Greenwich 1.632 0.816
Hackney 0.854 0.427
Hammersmith and Fulham 0.130 0.065
Haringey 7.324 3.662
Harrow 7.156 3.578
Havering 0.640 0.320
Hillingdon 3.914 1.957
Hounslow 1.516 0.758
Islington 0.144 0.072
Kensington and Chelsea 0.138 0.069
Kingston upon Thames 0.662 0.331
Lambeth 0.494 0.247
Lewisham 1.940 0.970
Merton 5.058 2.529
Newham 0.686 0.343
Redbridge 0.806 0.403
Richmond upon Thames 0.372 0.186
Southwark 1.994 0.997
Sutton 1.556 0.778
Tower Hamlets 0.136 0.068
Waltham Forest 0.988 0.494
Wandsworth 1.108 0.554
Westminster 0.420 0.210
Total London 83.558 41.779
Total England 382.000 191.000