HC Deb 27 October 1986 vol 103 cc9-15W
Mr. Tony Banks

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department when it became practice to stamp the passports of visitors granted an extension of stay requiring them to register at once with the police.

Mr. Waddington

It is not possible to say precisely when it became the practice to endorse the passports with the requirement to register with the police but it certainly predates the Immigration Act 1971 by very many years.

Mr. Tony Banks

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many visitors from the five

United Kingdom
Nationality Number of passengers admitted in the year ending May 1986 Number of passengers refused leave to enter and removed in the year ending Number of passengers known to have absconded1
May 1986 June 1986 Between July and December 19852 Between January and June 1986
India 259,000 2,745 2,931 37 131
Pakistan 117,000 1,962 2,094 9 28
Bangladesh 29,000 1,459 1,491 79 129

countries for which visas have recently been required have been sent back to the country of origin since 6 October despite the intervention of an hon. Member.

Mr. Waddington

On 7 October, two passengers were incorrectly returned. On 19 October, five passengers were sent back when a right hon. or hon. Member had expressed an interest in the case prior to the decision to refuse entry, and on the same day a further passenger was sent back when his case was not identified from the details provided by the hon. Member.

Although I am sure the House will understand the special difficulties which have recently obtained at the airport terminals concerned, I naturally regret the discourtesy to hon. and right hon. Members.

Mr. Tony Banks

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if a record is kept of the stated reason for travelling to the United Kingdom of visitors who are refused entry.

Mr. Waddington

Yes, on individual case papers only.

Mr. Teddy Taylor

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make it his policy to seek to ensure that nationals of the countries covered by the visa requirements outlined in the statement of 21 October who have the right of permanent settlement in the United Kingdom stamped in their passports do not require to obtain a re-entry visa when visiting their country of origin.

Mr. Waddington

Citizens of Bangladesh, Ghana, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka do not need a visa if they are settled here and return after an absence abroad of less than two years. The visa requirement for citizens of Nigeria will have a similar exemption. Arrangements have been made to enable those who are exempt from the visa requirement to obtain an endorsement in their passport confirming their exemption.

Mr. Kaufman

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) if he will state, in respect of the year ended June 1986, the number of passengers from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigeria and Ghana who (a) were admitted to the United Kingdom, (b) were refused admission to the United Kingdom and (c) are believed by his Department to have absconded following temporary admission;

(2) if he will state, in respect of the year ended June 1986, the number of passengers from South Africa who (a) were admitted to the United Kingdom, (b) were refused admission to the United Kingdom and (c) are believed to have absconded following temporary admission.

Mr. Waddington

The available information is given in the following table. Figures by nationality of passengers admitted in June 1986 are not yet available. Figures by nationality of passengers who absconded which cover all ports are only available from 1 January 1986.

Nationality Number of passengers admitted in the year ending May 1986 Number of passengers refused leave to enter and removed in the year ending Number of passengers known to have absconded1
May 1986 June 1986 Between July and December 19852 Between January and June 1986
Nigeria 248,000 3,461 3,634 5 19
Ghana 39,000 1,540 1,596 15 25
South Africa 99,500 118 123 0 0
1 Includes any passengers who absconded from the control at their port of entry or who absconded from detention.
2 Passengers arriving at Heathrow Terminal 3 only.

Mr. Kaufman

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will publish in the Official Report a statement for the year ended June 1986 of the total number of passengers from each country (a) admitted and (b) refused admission to the United Kingdom.

Passengers given leave to enter and passengers refused leave to enter and removed from the United Kingdom by nationality, excluding European Community nationals
Nationality Total passengers admitted in the year ending Passengers refused leave to enter and removed in the year ending
May 1986 May 1986 June 1986
Commonwealth
Australia 375,000 67 77
Bangladesh 29,000 1,459 1,491
Barbados 9,050 6 6
Canada 495,000 63 71
Cyprus 38,300 82 83
Ghana 39,000 1,540 1,596
Guyana 6,500 13 12
Hong Kong BDTC 60,100 140 114
India 259,000 2,745 2,931
Jamaica 30,200 101 105
Kenya 28,600 67 68
Malaysia 74,000 159 153
Malta 39,600 24 24
Mauritius 17,700 109 114
New Zealand 97,000 26 27
Nigeria 248,000 3,461 3,634
Sierra Leone 8,000 68 62
Singapore 36,700 50 52
Sri Lanka 27,800 502 408
Tanzania 12,100 80 87
Trinidad and Tobago 23,900 5 5
Uganda 7,730 65 74
Zimbabwe 17,500 43 45
Zambia 11,700 28 31
British Overseas citizens 14,400 51 55
Other Commonwealth Countries 31,500 145 144
COMMONWEALTH TOTAL 2,040,000 11,099 11,469
Foreign nationals
Algeria 25,000 679 667
Egypt 51,900 69 66
Argentina 25,800 111 116
Austria 112,000 60 57
Brazil 62,900 136 149
Bulgaria 4,640 18 24
Chile 11,200 42 34
China 13,000 28 28
Colombia 22,100 276 266
Cuba 860 1 1
Czechoslovakia 13,700 12 9
Ethiopia 5,640 42 43
Finland 83,200 23 28
German Democratic Republic 5,650 11 12
Hungary 19,800 16 21
Indonesia 15,900 10 13
Iran 65,100 338 339

Mr. Waddington

The following table gives, by nationality, the numbers of passengers admitted to the United Kingdom in the year ending May 1986 and the numbers refused entry and removed from the United Kingdom in both the year ending May 1986 and the year ending June 1986. Figures by nationality of passengers admitted in June 1986 are not yet available.

Nationality Total passengers admitted in the year ending Passengers refused leave removed in the year ending
May 1986 May 1986 June 1986
Iraq 20,900 122 125
Israel 108,000 170 172
Japan 337,000 79 86
Jordan 26,900 25 25
Kuwait 33,500 5 6
Lebanon 38,900 83 81
Libya 3,890 91 96
Mexico 51,400 33 32
Morocco 18,000 800 792
Norway 274,000 36 35
Pakistan 117,000 1,962 2,094
Peru 9,400 41 41
Philippines 27,700 130 128
Poland 43,000 115 118
Romania 3,440 19 19
Saudi Arabia 51,400 87 85
Somalia 1,980 5 8
South Africa 99,500 118 123
Sudan 18,300 43 46
Sweden 380,000 88 95
Switzerland 258,000 59 50
Syria 15,200 23 40
Thailand 20,000 37 37
Tunisia 9,820 165 155
Turkey 56,800 852 834
United States of America 3,000,000 620 653
USSR 11,200 84 84
Uruguay 4,200 7 7
Venezuela 12,300 6 9
Yugoslavia 38,800 159 160
Other Foreign countries 161,000 495 515
Stateless 77,100 645 649
NON EC FOREIGN NATIONAL TOTAL 5,870,000 9,076 9,281
ALL NATIONALITIES EXCLUDING EC 7,910,000 20,175 20,750

Mr. Nellist

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if any compensation arrangements will be introduced by the Government for the families of visitors detained at Heathrow and other ports of entry to cover their accommodation, travel expenses and loss of earnings; and if he will make a statement.

Mr. Waddington

No.

Mr. Janner

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what is the estimated cost per annum of a visa immigration officer at Heathrow; how many there are at present in Heathrow; how many interpreters of Indian languages are stationed at present in Heathrow; and what is the estimated cost per annum of keeping them there.

Mr. Waddington

At 30 September 1986, 542 immigration officers and seven interpreters specialising in languages of the Indian sub-continent were based at Heathrow. The other information requested which is readily available is as follows.

The basic salary scale for immigration officers ranges from £5,605 to £10,188, and for interpreters from £6,681 to £9,452. In addition they receive London weighting, premium pay for weekend working, overtime and a shift disturbance allowance of 16.5 per cent. of basic pay for an immigration officer and 10.5 per cent. for an interpreter.

Mr. Janner

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what estimate he made of the cost of installing additional officers at Heathrow to cope with the increased work load of entry applications as opposed to sending additional officers abroad.

Mr. Waddington

On certain assumptions it was estimated that up to 300 additional immigration service staff might have been required at all ports to meet the extra workload imposed by the growth of difficult casework. Extra office, control and detention accommodation would also have been required. Not only is this not available in the existing buildings, but its provision could not have guaranteed a satisfactory solution or an end to congestion and delays in the long term. Complex or difficult cases simply cannot he quickly and effectively scrutinised at the ports.

Mr. Kaufman

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department on what basis his Department establishes the numbers and natural origins of visitors alleged to be absconders.

Mr. Waddington

The record of absconders is of people of whom all trace is lost either before a decision is made on whether they qualify for entry or after they haw been refused entry and are avoiding removal. The figure includes those who:

  1. (a) abscond from immigration control areas or detention accommodation;
  2. (b) have been allowed temporary admission to a private address or hotel to a specific date, but who fail to report on the due date and with whom contact is lost;
  3. (c) have been similarly allowed temporary admission but without a restriction as to reporting on a specific date, who cannot subsequently be traced when the immigration service seek to contact them;
  4. (d) are reported by their hosts as having absconded from private addresses.

Nationality is taken as that given in the passport produced.

This category is different from that of overstayers, who are admitted as visitors but then stay on.

Mr. Dubs

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many passengers in total have been granted temporary admission in each quarter of the current year;

(2) how many passengers refused entry to the United Kingdom were (a) detained, (b) given temporary admission and (c) given temporary admission to hotels in each quarter since January.

Period in 1986
1st quarter 2nd quarter July and August
Number of passengers taken into detention in approved accommodation either pending further examination or after refusal of leave to enter 3,598 3,808 2,668
Number of passengers granted temporary admission Pending further examination 1,656 1,582 2,074
After refusal of leave to enter1 1,948 2,756 2,281
1 The same person may be counted in both categories.