§ Ms. Harmanasked the Secretary of State for the Environment why, as indicated in the letter accompanying the call-in letter, the London borough of Southwark was not notified of the conflict between the north Southwark plan and circulars 22/80, 15/84 and 22/84 during the statutory preparation stages of the north Southwark plan.
§ Mr. TraceyThe London borough of Southwark should be well aware of policies contained in Government circulars. The general issues of conflict were raised in objections to the plan and aired at the public inquiry without the need for intervention by the Department.
§ Ms. Harmanasked the Secretary of State for the Environment why his Department did not give evidence indicating its concern about the conflict between the north Southwark plan and circulars 22/80, 15/84 and 22/84 at the north Southwark plan public inquiry.
§ Mr. TraceyFor the reasons given in answer to the earlier question the Secretary of State decided not to make formal objection and give evidence at a public inquiry.
§ Ms. Harmanasked the Secretary of State for the Environment why he exercised his powers to call in the north Southwark plan under section 14(3) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1971 specifically on 28 January.
§ Mr. TraceyIt was believed that Southwark was to hold a meeting on 29 January when the position of the plan might be considered. To remove any uncertainty my right hon. Friend called in the plan prior to that meeting.
254W
§ Ms. Harmanasked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will allow the London borough of Southwark to adopt its statutory land use plan for north Southwark.
§ Mr. TraceyNo. My right hon. Friend is currently considering the plan following call-in on 29 January. It is hoped to issue a decision shortly.