HC Deb 10 June 1985 vol 80 cc304-5W
Mr. McNamara

asked the Secretary of State for Defence when he compared the Tucano and PC9 prices for the new RAF basic trainer, and what allowance was made in relation to the price of the Tucano to cover the costs associated with having the Jet Provost in service for longer than was originally planned.

Mr. Butler

The prices were compared and continuously reviewed throughout the period leading up to the announcement of our decision on 21 March 1985. As the Jet Provost is not required to remain in service for longer than originally planned as a result of the choice of the Tucano, no allowance was made in the price comparison.

Mr. McNamara

asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether Short's contract for the Tucano aircraft requires completion and delivery to full RAF specification standard of two aircraft in the autumn of 1986, 12 by mid-1987 and 24 by the end of 1987.

Mr. Butler

Yes.